본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 장거리미사일 개발과 한국의 대응

Development of North Korea`s Long-range Ballistic Missiles and ROK`s Countermeasures

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류군사학

초록

-The aim of this paper is to analyze the development of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles and ROK``s countermeasures. To this end, the paper is composed of 5 chapters titled introduction, the concept of long-range ballistic missile and differences with space rocket, the current situation, intension, and capability of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles development, ROK``s countermeasures, and conclusion. North Korea has continuously developed nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles etc. North Korea continues to pose a serious threat to the ROK and the international community by developing WMD such as nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. North Korea test-launched a Taepodong-1 missile in 1998 and Taepodong-2 in 2006. It is estimated that North Korea has the ability to threaten the continental United States with its missiles as shown with six launches of long-range missiles, including the ones in 2009, in April and December 2012. and in February 2014. Despite chronic economic crisis and food shortage, North Korea is relentlessly pursuing nuclear and missile development while maintaining adversarial strategy towards the ROK. North Korea``s military have pursued national unification by use of armed forces as their top policy priority since North and South division. The Intension of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles development is not to go to nuclear war against the USA but eventually to pursue national unification under communism by use of armed forces. For over 60 years, the ROK-U.S. Alliance has been a firm foundation and driving force for the ROK to achieve a liberal democracy and economic prosperity in the face of persistent North Korean threats and provocations. The ROK military effectively should deter the use of nuclear weapons and missiles by North Korea based on the ROK-U.S. Tailored Deterrence Strategy (TDS), and prepare against North Korean nuclear and missile threats by developing the Kill Chain and Korea Air and Missile Defense (KAMD) system stage by stage. The our government``s countermeasures on North Korea``s nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles must include diplomatic and military means. The ROK and the United States should reinforce their collective defense endeavors and cope jointly with transnational security threats such as development of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles etc. based on the principles of the ROK -U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty, thereby contributing to world peace and stability

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the development of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles and ROK``s countermeasures. To this end, the paper is composed of 5 chapters titled introduction, the concept of long-range ballistic missile and differences with space rocket, the current situation, intension, and capability of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles development, ROK``s countermeasures, and conclusion. North Korea has continuously developed nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles etc. North Korea continues to pose a serious threat to the ROK and the international community by developing WMD such as nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. North Korea test-launched a Taepodong-1 missile in 1998 and Taepodong-2 in 2006. It is estimated that North Korea has the ability to threaten the continental United States with its missiles as shown with six launches of long-range missiles, including the ones in 2009, in April and December 2012. and in February 2014. Despite chronic economic crisis and food shortage, North Korea is relentlessly pursuing nuclear and missile development while maintaining adversarial strategy towards the ROK. North Korea``s military have pursued national unification by use of armed forces as their top policy priority since North and South division. The Intension of North Korea``s long-range ballistic missiles development is not to go to nuclear war against the USA but eventually to pursue national unification under communism by use of armed forces. For over 60 years, the ROK-U.S. Alliance has been a firm foundation and driving force for the ROK to achieve a liberal democracy and economic prosperity in the face of persistent North Korean threats and provocations. The ROK military effectively should deter the use of nuclear weapons and missiles by North Korea based on the ROK-U.S. Tailored Deterrence Strategy (TDS), and prepare against North Korean nuclear and missile threats by developing the Kill Chain and Korea Air and Missile Defense (KAMD) system stage by stage. The our government``s countermeasures on North Korea``s nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles must include diplomatic and military means. The ROK and the United States should reinforce their collective defense endeavors and cope jointly with transnational security threats such as development of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles etc. based on the principles of the ROK -U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty, thereby contributing to world peace and stability

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 국가안보실, "희망의 시대 국가안보전략" (2014)
  2. 국방기술품질원, "국방과학기술용어사전" (2011)
  3. 길병옥, "군사학개론" (2009), 충남대학교출판부
  4. 김강녕, "국제정치와 한반도 평화" (2007), 신지서원
  5. 대한민국 국방부, "2014 국방백서" (2014)
  6. 대한민국 국방부, "국방백서" (2000)
  7. 세종연구소, , 정세와 정책, 통권 : 157 (2009)
  8. 정치학대사전편찬위원회, "21세기 정치학대사전" (2010), 한국사전연구사
  9. PMG 지식엔진연구소, "시사상식사전" (2010), 박문각
  10. 손무(孫武), "손자병법" (2004), 범우사
  11. 황진환, "협력안보시대에 한국의 안보와 군비통제" (1998), 봉명
  12. 국방부 국방교육정책관실, "제7주차 시사안보: 북한의 장거리미사일 발사와 우리의 대응자세", 국방일보, ~ (2016)
  13. 길병옥, "북한 핵위협의 실질증대와 우리의 대응방안", 동북아 안보와 평화협력 모색 (2014), 한국동북아학회·원광대 군사학연구소
  14. 길병옥, "미래전 대비 국방개혁 및 국방력 발전방향", 공군평론, (116) (2005)
  15. 김성만, "북(北) 장거리미사일 발사에 대한 분석과 대응", 블루 투데이, ~ (2016)
  16. 김정안, "북(北0, SLBM 쏘고 남(南)에 ‘진정성 갖자’", 동아일보, ~ (2015)
  17. 김준래, "북한 장거리 미사일의 기술수준은?: 대기권 재진입과 탑재중량이 관건", The Science Times, ~ (2016)
  18. 김진아, "북한의 핵 미사일 실험이후 한국의 대비방향", 제주평화연구원. JPI PeaceNet, ~ (2016)
  19. 김태우, "북한의 장거리미사일 발사와 한국안보", 한국해양전략연구소 발제논문, ~ (2012)
  20. 김호준, "북(北)장거리미사일: 북(北) 기술수준은…미(美)전역 사정권 되나", 연합뉴스, ~ (2016)
  21. 문형철, "한미 양국 사드 한반드 배치 공식 발표", 파이낸셜뉴스, ~ (2016)
  22. 박수찬, "북한 장거리미사일기술 수준은", 세계일보, ~ (2016)
  23. 박창권, "북한의 핵미사일 도발과 사드 배치의 중요성", KIMS Pericsope, (30) (2016)
  24. 박휘락, "한반도 안전, 사드 배치보다 더 시급한 것", 한국경제, ~ (2016)
  25. 박휘락, "북(北) 미사일 발사, 실질 방어능력을 높이자", 매일경제, ~ (2016)
  26. 서춘식, "국가안보론" (2007), 박영사
  27. 성동규, "북한의 장거리미사일 발사일지", Money Week 뉴스, ~ (2016)
  28. 신현식, "유엔 안보리, ‘초강력’ 대북제재 결의안 채택…주요 내용은", ~ (2016)
  29. 오영환, "한민구 ‘북 핵 대한민국 겨누고 있다", 중앙일보, ~ (2016)
  30. 이석종, "그것이 알고 싶디: 유엔안보리 결의 2270호 주요내용", 국방일보, ~ (2016)
  31. 이승렬, "유엔 안보리 대북제재 결의안 채택과 대응방안", 이슈와 논점, (1133) (2016), 국회입법조사처
  32. 이승우, "북(北) 로켓 발사 ‘성공여부 확인 중’", 연합뉴스, ~ (2012)
  33. 장민성, "사드착수일지: 사드도입 거론부터 한미공동실무단 착수까지", 뉴시스(Newsis), ~ (2016)
  34. 전수진, "북 노동당 규약에 핵·경제 병진 첫 명시", 중앙일보, ~ (2016)
  35. 정용수, "중국(쑨젠궈 부총참모장), 사드 한반도 배치 반대…지역안정 잠식", 중앙일보, ~ (2016)
  36. 정용수, "한민구 국방장관 CNN과 인터뷰", 중앙일보, ~ (2016)
  37. 정윤섭, "북(北) 장거리미사일 발사…북(北) ‘완전성공’·한미 ‘사드 공론화’", 연합뉴스, ~ (2016)
  38. 제성호, "한미동맹의 법적∙제도적 고찰", 국가정보연구, 7(2), pp.153~214 (2014), 한국국가정보학회
  39. 청와대, "북한 장거리미사일 발사에 대한 대한민국 정부성명(전문)", 정책 브리핑: 정책뉴스, ~ (2016)
  40. 최병효, "북한 핵을 어떻게 볼 것인가?-(上)", 전주매일신문, ~ (2016)
  41. 한반도 선진화재단, "북한의 4차 핵실험이후 대북정책의 방향과 전략", Hansun Brief, 통권 : 35 (2016)
  42. 홍현익, "북한의 장거리미사일도발과 한국의 원인요법 대응", 서울신문, ~ (2016)
  43. 홍희범, "재래식 폭격수단에 활용되는 탄도미사일", 월간 자유, 통권 : 508 (2015)
  44. "북(北) 장거리미사일도발, 사드 이상의 강력 대응 필요하다(사설)", 동아일보, ~ (2016)
  45. "북한의 장거리 로켓(미사일) 발사 일지", 경향신문, ~ (2016)
  46. "1998년 대포동 1호부터…북한 장거리미사일 발사 역사는?", KBS NEWS, ~ (2016)
  47. "한국형 미사일방어체계 첫 요격시험 성공", 중앙일보, ~ (2016)
  48. "제2차 세계대전 시크릿 100선<66> V-병기" (1915)[URL]
  49. "대륙간탄도유도탄"[URL]
  50. "로켓"[URL]
  51. "미사일"[URL]
  52. "유도탄"[URL]
  53. "유도탄"[URL]
  54. "북한 장거리미사일 발사에 대한 대한민국 정부성명"[URL]
  55. "탄도유도탄"[URL]
  56. "키워드로 보는 북한핵: 대포동 1호(백두산 1호) 시험발사"[URL]
  57. "매일경제", ~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)