본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Composition,Dimensional Issue and Nature of Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) Construct

Rakesh Gupta|V. J. Sebastian
경영경제연구소 (management & economic research institute)|2014.06|아태비즈니스연구 ((APJB) Asia Pacific Journal of Business)|제5권 제1호|pp. 23-32

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Entrepreneurship is considered as an important driver ofeconomic growth, new firm creation, business rejuvenation&job creation. Over a period of time research withinentrepreneurship literature has shifted from entrepreneurandhis personality to his behavioral disposition. This has ledtoemergence of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) construct,which focuses on the process of entrepreneurship at firmleveland it has emerged as the most widely researched areawithin entrepreneurship field. Though research in this fieldhas been rigorous and exhaustive, still there have been concernsthat researchers might have prematurely agreed on thecomposition, dimensionality, andnature of EO Construct. There has been considerable debate about whether EO Constructcomprises three or five dimensions, about co-varianceor independence of these dimensions and nature of constructwhether formative or reflective. This article builds an argumentabout the multidimensional nature of EO constructcomprising five dimensions, which vary independentlyand thefact that EO is better explained through formative constructrather than reflective one.

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is considered as an important driver ofeconomic growth, new firm creation, business rejuvenation&job creation. Over a period of time research withinentrepreneurship literature has shifted from entrepreneurandhis personality to his behavioral disposition. This has ledtoemergence of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) construct,which focuses on the process of entrepreneurship at firmleveland it has emerged as the most widely researched areawithin entrepreneurship field. Though research in this fieldhas been rigorous and exhaustive, still there have been concernsthat researchers might have prematurely agreed on thecomposition, dimensionality, andnature of EO Construct. There has been considerable debate about whether EO Constructcomprises three or five dimensions, about co-varianceor independence of these dimensions and nature of constructwhether formative or reflective. This article builds an argumentabout the multidimensional nature of EO constructcomprising five dimensions, which vary independentlyand thefact that EO is better explained through formative constructrather than reflective one.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. BROCKHAUS, R., "Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs", Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp.509~520 (1980)
  2. BURGELMAN, R. A., "Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management : Insights from a Process Study", Management Science, 29(8), pp.1349~1364 (1983)
  3. COOPER, A. C., "Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership", Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), pp.53~68 (1986)
  4. COVIN, J. G., "International Entrepreneurial Orientation : Conceptual Considerations, Research Themes, Measurement Issues, and Future Research Directions", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), pp.11~44 (2014)
  5. COVIN, J. G., "The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), pp.677~702 (2012)
  6. COVIN, J. G., "Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research : Reflections on a needed construct", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), pp.855~872 (2011)
  7. COVIN, J., "Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation sales growth rate relationships", Entrepreneurship: Theory &Practice, 30(1), pp.57~81 (2006)
  8. COVIN, J. G., "A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour", Ent. Theory & Practice, 15(1), pp.7~25 (1991)
  9. COVIN, J. G., "Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments", Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp.75~87 (1989)
  10. DESS, G., "Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), pp.85~102 (1999)
  11. DIAMANTOPOULOS, A., "Advancing formative measurement models", Journal of Business Research, 61, pp.1203~1218 (2008)
  12. GARTNER, W. B., "A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of newventure creation", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), pp.696~706 (1985)
  13. GEORGE. B. A, "Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of the Consequences of Differing Construct Representations", Journal of Management Studies, 48, pp.1291~1313 (2011)
  14. GEORGE, B., "The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling and operationalization", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), pp.989~1024 (2011)
  15. HUGHES M., "Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth", Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp.651~661 (2007)
  16. KHANDWALLA, P. N., "The Design of Organizations" (1977), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  17. KNIGHT, G. A., "Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation", Journal of Business Venturing, 12, pp.213~225 (1997)
  18. KREISER, P. M., "Reassessing the environment-EO link: The impact of environmental hostility on the dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation", Academy of Management Proceedings (2002)
  19. KREISER, P. M., "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Unique Impact of Innovativeness, Proactiveness& Risk-taking", Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23(1), pp.39~51 (2010)
  20. LAW, K. S., "Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: an illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs", Journal of Management, 25, pp.143~160 (1999)
  21. LI, D., "Entrepreneurial Orientation and International Scope: The Differential role of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking", Journal of Business Venturing, 29, pp.511~524 (2014)
  22. LIEBERMAN, M., "Firstmover advantages", Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp.41~58 (1988)
  23. LUMPKIN, G. T., "Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance", Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135~172 (1996)
  24. LUMPKIN, G. T., "Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance:The moderating role of environment and industry lifecycle", Journal of Business Venturing, 16, pp.429~451 (2001)
  25. MACKENZIE, S. B., "The dangers of poor construct conceptualization", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, pp.323~326 (2003)
  26. MACKENZIE, S. B., "The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions", Journalof Applied Psychology, 90, pp.710~730 (2005)
  27. MCCLELLAND, D. C., "Achievement motivation can be developed", Harvard Business Review, 43, pp.6~25 (1965)
  28. MILLER, D., "The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms", Management Science, 29, pp.770~791 (1983)
  29. MILLER, D., "Miller (1983) Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions for the Future", Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(5), pp.873~894 (2011)
  30. MINTZBERG, H., "Strategy making in three modes", California Management Review, 16(2), pp.44~53 (1973)
  31. NELSON, R., "An evolutionary theory of economic theory and capabilities" (1982), Harvard University Press
  32. RAUCH, A., "Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research", pp.164~177 (2004), Babson College
  33. SCHOLLHAMMER, H., "Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship" (1982), Prentice Hall
  34. STETZ, P. E., "Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research" (2000), Babson College
  35. WALES, W. J., "Non-linear effects of EO on small firm performance:the moderating role of resource orchestrationcapabilities", Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), pp.93~121 (2013)
  36. William J. Wales, "Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research", International Small Business Journal, 31(4), pp.357~383 (2013), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  37. WEBSTER, F. A., "Entrepreneurs and ventures: An attempt at classification and clarification", Academy ofManagement Review, 2(1), pp.54~61 (1977)
  38. XIAO Z., "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Social Capital & Internationalization of SMEs: Evidence from China", Thunderbird Business Review, 54(2), pp.195~210 (2012)
  39. ZAHRA, S. A., "Environment,corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach", Journal of Business Venturing, 8, pp.319~340 (1993)
  40. ZAHRA, S. A., "The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), pp.45~65 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

An Exploration of the Organizational and Environmental Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Orientation김은미, 조효은한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2023 · 제24권 제2호Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Performance : The Mediating Role of Knowledge CapabilitiesShruti Batra경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2015 · 제6권 제1호Assessing Public Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Applicability of the Three-Factor Model김윤희성균관대학교 국정전문대학원 · 국정관리연구2011 · 제6권 제1호기업가 지향성: 국내 선행연구 분석 및 향후 연구방향에 대한 제언박태경, 이재강한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2016 · 제38권 제4호How Entrepreneurial Orientation Impacts a Firm’s Non-financial Performance : The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability차형석한국전문경영인학회 · 전문경영인연구2024 · 제27권 제3호The Linkages between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Market Orientation toward MSMEs PerformancesAriyani Wahyu Wijayanti, Budi Wahyono, Muhammad Kholid Arif Rozaq사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2016 · 제21권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

Efficiency and Returns to Scale in the Bangladesh Banking Sector: Empirical Evidence from the Slack-Based DEA MethodFadzlan Sufian, Fakarudin Kamarudinpp. 1-12Determinants of Shopping Experience for Mall Shoppers: Empirical Investigation in an Emerging City of Raipur (India)Sanjeev Prashar, Harvinder Singh, Rashmi Agarwal, Tarun Kumar Sharmapp. 13-22The Effect of Conventional Bank’s Interest Rate & Islamic Bank’s Profit Rate on Investment & Return: An Empirical Investigation in BangladeshSyed Mohammad Khaled Rahman, Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous Chowdhurypp. 33-42A New Higher Education Policy In Russia : Enhancing Meaning-Centered Education via its RealizationNatalia P. Ivashchenko, Tatyana V. Malovichkopp. 43-53
원문 보기