본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Assessing Public Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Applicability of the Three-Factor Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

There has been no consistent conceptualization of the entrepreneurial characteristics that are applicable to the public sector, while extensive studies from other disciplines have reached a consensus on the operationalization of three aspects of entrepreneurship such as risk-taking, innovativeness, and proactiveness. These operational concepts have been characterized by either a unistructured or a multistructured framework. This study primarily examines whether the three dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation can also be applied to test a sustainable notion of public entrepreneurship and the independence of its dimensionalities using structural equation model. The results indicate that the three operational dimensions can indeed be implemented for better understanding in practices of public entrepreneurship. The findings suggest that institutionalization of the public entrepreneurial approach with three components should enhance its practical roles in different organizational structures and process cycles through incorporating the core values of public services.

Abstract

There has been no consistent conceptualization of the entrepreneurial characteristics that are applicable to the public sector, while extensive studies from other disciplines have reached a consensus on the operationalization of three aspects of entrepreneurship such as risk-taking, innovativeness, and proactiveness. These operational concepts have been characterized by either a unistructured or a multistructured framework. This study primarily examines whether the three dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation can also be applied to test a sustainable notion of public entrepreneurship and the independence of its dimensionalities using structural equation model. The results indicate that the three operational dimensions can indeed be implemented for better understanding in practices of public entrepreneurship. The findings suggest that institutionalization of the public entrepreneurial approach with three components should enhance its practical roles in different organizational structures and process cycles through incorporating the core values of public services.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Bellone, Carl J., "Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy", Public Administration Review, 52(2), pp.130~134 (1992)
  2. Berman, E.M., "Responsible Risk-taking", Public Administration Review, 58(4), pp.346~352 (1998)
  3. Bernier, Luc, "The Changing Nature of Public Entrepreneurship", Public Administration Review, 67(3), pp.488~503 (2007)
  4. Borins,Sandford., "Innovating with Integrity: How Local Heroes are Transforming American Government" (1998), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  5. Borins, Sandford., "What Border? Public Management Innovation in the United States and Canada", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9(1), pp.46~74 (2000)
  6. Boyett,I., "The Public Sector Entrepreneur - A Definition", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(2), pp.36~51 (1996)
  7. Bozeman,Barry., "Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism" (2007), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  8. Bozeman, Barry, "Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations", Public Administration Review, 5(2), pp.109~117 (1998)
  9. Browne, Michael W., "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit", Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), pp.230~258 (1992)
  10. Caruana, Albert, "Effects of Some Environmental Challenges and Centralization on the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Public Sector Entities", The Service Industries Journal, 22(2), pp.43~58 (2002)
  11. Converse, Jean M., "Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire" (1986), Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
  12. Covin, Jeffrey G., "The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management Style", Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), pp.217~234 (1988)
  13. Covin, Jeffrey G., "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), pp.7~25 (1991)
  14. Damanpour, Fariborz, "Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization, and Top Managers", British Journal of Management, 17(3), pp.215~236 (2006)
  15. Davidsson, Per, "Editor’s Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years on: Achievements and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), pp.5~15 (2001)
  16. Davis, Duane, "Perceived Environmental Turbulence and its Effect on Selected Entrepreneurship, Marketing, and Organizational Characteristics in Industrial Firms", Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 19(1), pp.43~51 (1991)
  17. Dess, Gregory G., "Linking Corporate Entrepreneurial Entrepreneurship to Strategy, Structure, and Process: Suggested Research Directions", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), pp.85~102 (1999)
  18. Eggers, William D., "Revolution at the Roots: Making Our Government Smaller, Better, and Closer to Home" (1995), NY: Free Press
  19. Fan, Xitao, "Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.56~83 (1999)
  20. Forster, John, "The New Public Entrepreneurialism in Beverly Hills: Sage Publications" (1996), Australia: Center for Australian Public Sector Management
  21. Gore,Al., "From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less" (1993), Washington, DC: Report of the National Performance Review
  22. Helfrich, Christian D., "Assessing an Organizational Culture Instrument Based on the Competing Values Framework: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses", Implement Science, 2(13), pp.1~14 (2007)
  23. Hu, Li-tze, "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999)
  24. Ingram, Paul, "The Choice-within-constraints New Institutionalism and Implications for Sociology", Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp.525~546 (2000)
  25. Jennings, Daniel F., "Functionally Modeling Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Integrative Analysis", Journal of Management, 15(3), pp.485~502 (1989)
  26. Jaccard, James, "Lisrel Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression" (1996), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  27. Johnston, "A Question of Place: Exploring the Practice of Human Geography" (1991), Oxford: Blackwell
  28. Keys, Paul R, "Administrative Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector", Administration in Social Work, 12(2), pp.59~68 (1988)
  29. Kim, Younhee, "Improving Performance in U.S. State Governments: Risk-taking, Innovativeness and Proactiveness Practices", Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), pp.107~132 (2010)
  30. Kline,Rex B., "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling" (1998), NY: The Guilford Press
  31. Kreiser, Patrick M., "Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale: A Multi-country Analysis", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), pp.71~94 (2002)
  32. Llewellyn, Nick, "Controversies and Conceptual Development: Examining Public Entrepreneurship", Public Management Review, 16(3), pp.183~197 (2003)
  33. Lumpkin, G.T., "Linking Two Dimensions ofEntrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle", Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), pp.429~451 (2001)
  34. Lyon, Douglas W., "Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process", Journal of Management, 26(5), pp.1055~1085 (2000)
  35. Martin, Roscoe, "The Cities and the Federal System" (1965), New York: Atherton
  36. Miller, Danny, "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms", Management Science, 29(7), pp.770~791 (1983)
  37. Miller, Danny, "Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum", Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), pp.544~569 (1982)
  38. Mintzberg,Henry, "Managing Government: Governing Management", Harvard Business Review, 74(3), pp.75~83 (1996)
  39. Moon,Myung Jae, "The Pursuit of Managerial Entrepreneurship: Does Organization Matter", Public Administration Review, 59(1), pp.31~43 (1999)
  40. Moon, M. Jae, "Does the Perception of Red Tape Constraint IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications", Journal Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), pp.273~291 (2002)
  41. Morris, Michael H., "Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: The Case of the Public Sector", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), pp.71~91 (1999)
  42. Morris, Michael H., "Corporate Entrepreneurship" (2002), Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers
  43. Nicholson, Nigel, "Personality and Domain-Specific Risk Taking", Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), pp.157~176 (2005)
  44. Nunnally, Jum C., "Psychometric Theory" (1994), New York: McGraw Hill
  45. Osborne, David, "Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector" (1992), Reading: Addison-Wesley
  46. O’Sullivan, Elizabethann, "Research Methods for Public Administrators (4th ed.)" (2003), New York: Longman
  47. Perlmutter, Felice D., "Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: The Horns of a Dilemma", Public Administration Review, 55(1), pp.29~36 (1995)
  48. Ramamurti, Ravi, "Public Entrepreneurs: Who They Are and How They Operate", California Management Review, 28(3), pp.142~158 (1986)
  49. Roberts, Nancy C., "Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), pp.147~175 (1991)
  50. Schildt, Henri A., "Scholarly Communities in Entrepreneurship Research: A Co-citation Analysis", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), pp.399~415 (2006)
  51. Schneider, "Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton" (1995), Princeton University Press
  52. Shane, Scott, "The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research", The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp.217~226 (2000)
  53. Slevin, Dennis P., "Juggling Entrepreneurial Style and Organizational Structure-How to Get Your Act Together", Sloan Management Review, 31, pp.43~53 (1990)
  54. Steiger, J. H., "EzPATH: A Supplementary Module for SYSTAT and SYSGRAPH" (1989), Evanston, IL. SYSTAT
  55. Stone, Jeffrey B., "Public Entrepreneurship in Florida Local Government Administration", 박사, pp.1992
  56. Tabachnick, Barbara G., "Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.)" (2001), Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon
  57. Vigoda-Gadot, E., "Public Sector Innovation for the Managerial and the Post-managerial Era: Promises and Realities in a Globalizing Public Administration", International Public Management Journal, 8(1), pp.57~81 (2005)
  58. 리차드 워커, "An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework", JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 18(4), pp.591~615, OXFORD UNIV PRESS
  59. Yang-Wallentin, "Testing interactions with three different methods in the theory of planned behavir: Analysis of traffic behavior data in Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future", pp.405~423 (2001), IL: Scientific Software International, Inc
  60. Zerbinati, Stefania, "Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: A Framework of Analysis in European Local Government", Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(1), pp.43~64 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)