‘한국양명학의 시원’으로서 소재 노수신 평가에 대한 기초적 논의 -한국양명학사 記述에서 노수신의 위상을 중심으로-

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is basic discussion on the evaluation of Roh susin, as a source of Korean Yangmingxue, Focusing on the Status of Rohsusin's position in the narrative of Korean Yangmingxue. There are ten major books and papers that are discussed in this paper, in Korean Yangmingxue history. The contents of this paper are as follows: First, the first Yangmyong scholars were Nam Eun Kyung and Iyo, or Jang Yoo an Choe Myung Kil in the Korean Yangming Studies, which was formed during the latter era of the Choson Dynasty to the Japanese colonial period. In other words, Roh susin is not mentioned. Second, There are three points of view describing Yangming. First, it was natural, in Joseon society from the viewpoint of ruling by Zhuzixue as an orthodox, rejected Yangmingxue. At that time, Toegyehak was a place of orthodox thought such as Zhuzixue. From this point of view, it is estimated that there was no Yangmingxue in Joseon society. So, it is concluded that the miracle of the Japanese Meijiyusin by the Yangmingxue did not happened. As a result of this logic, comes out, so called. the Seonglihakmangguklonja, who claim that the country is ruined because of xinglixue. Third, Roh Susin was alienated from three sides, that is, from the Zhuzixue, Toegye scholars, korean Yangming scholars and Seonglihakmangguklonja. Finally, it is a problem of whether Roh susin is a Yangmingxue or not. Because of Roh susin accepts the idea of Luo qinshun, Zhuzixue scholar. Luo opposed ideologically with Wang Yang-ming. Therefore, there are many points to discuss in order to define him as a Yangming scholar. Any consequences should be discussed with specific grounds, so the results of these discussions will affect future research.