골로새서의 명령을 위한 동사의 시제 연구
Usage of the Verb for Commandment and Prohibition in Colossians
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Most New Testament scholars consent that the use of tense in the imperative mood delivers aspect rather than time or Aktionsart. In spite of such agreement, contradictory arguments appear concerning the precise function of its tense. Some scholars claim that the present imperative is more emphasized than the aorist imperative. In contrast, others argue for the opposite view that the aorist in the imperative mood indicates the urgency or solemnity: the action of the aorist tense is accentuated. By the investigation of the imperative in some Pauline letters such as Ephesians and 2 Timothy, it has become evident that the latter represents an appropriate explanation. Is this conclusion applied to Colossians, too? Colossians contains much more present imperatives than aorist imperatives as most of other Pauline letters. The ratio between present and aorist is 23:7 in the epistle. Besides, the aorist subjunctive occurs three times with mh, for prohibition. Does the aorist tense for commandment and prohibition indicate the urgency or solemnity in Colossians?This study scrutinizes the usage of the aorist tense for commandment and prohibition in Colossians in order to determine if the previous conclusion is also valid for the epistle. It demonstrates that the Apostle Paul employed the present imperative when he had no special reason or intention; only when he intended to make some points prominent or emphasized, he made use of the aorist form of the imperative or the subjunctive mood for prohibition.
Abstract
Most New Testament scholars consent that the use of tense in the imperative mood delivers aspect rather than time or Aktionsart. In spite of such agreement, contradictory arguments appear concerning the precise function of its tense. Some scholars claim that the present imperative is more emphasized than the aorist imperative. In contrast, others argue for the opposite view that the aorist in the imperative mood indicates the urgency or solemnity: the action of the aorist tense is accentuated. By the investigation of the imperative in some Pauline letters such as Ephesians and 2 Timothy, it has become evident that the latter represents an appropriate explanation. Is this conclusion applied to Colossians, too? Colossians contains much more present imperatives than aorist imperatives as most of other Pauline letters. The ratio between present and aorist is 23:7 in the epistle. Besides, the aorist subjunctive occurs three times with mh, for prohibition. Does the aorist tense for commandment and prohibition indicate the urgency or solemnity in Colossians?This study scrutinizes the usage of the aorist tense for commandment and prohibition in Colossians in order to determine if the previous conclusion is also valid for the epistle. It demonstrates that the Apostle Paul employed the present imperative when he had no special reason or intention; only when he intended to make some points prominent or emphasized, he made use of the aorist form of the imperative or the subjunctive mood for prohibition.
참고문헌 (22)
- 정창욱, "디모데후서에 사용된 명령법 시제의 이해", 신약연구, 11(2), pp.1~29 (2012), 한국복음주의신약학회[DOI]
- S.E. Porter, "Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament: With Reference to Tense and Mood" (1989), Peter Lang
- B. Fanning, "Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek" (1990), Clarendon
- 정창욱, "성경 헬라어와 신약성경의 이해" (2012), 그리심
- D.J. Moo, "The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon" (2008), Eerdmans
- J.D.G. Dunn, "The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon: A Commentary on the Greek Text" (1996), Eerdmans
- R. Mcl. Wilson, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Colossians and Philemon" (2005), T.&T. Clark International
- "BDAG", ~
- H.G. Liddell, "A Greek-English Lexicon", pp.1166~ (1869), The Oxford Universtiy Press
- M.J. Harris, "Colossians & Philemon", pp.145~ (1991), Eerdmans
- L.B. Radford, "The Epistle to the Colossians and the Epistle to Philemon", pp.260~ (1931), Methuen & Co. LTD
- D.B. Wallce, "Greek Grammar: Beyond the Basics" (1996), Zondervan
- D.L. Matthewson, "Verbal Aspect in the Book of Revelation: The Function of Greek Tenses in John’s Apocalypse", pp.30~34 (2010)
- C.R. Campbell, "Verbal Aspect: The Indicative Mood and Narrative Verbal Aspect", pp.198~202 (2007), Peter Lang
- S.E. Porter, "Idioms of the Greek New Testament", pp.21~22 (1992), Sheffield Academic Press
- Peter T. O’Brien, "Colossians & Philemon" (1982), Word Books
- M. Barth, "Colossians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary" (1994), Doubleday
- R.R. Melick, "Philippians, Colossians, Philemon", pp.287~ (1991), Broadman
- N.K. Gupta, "Colossians", pp.132~ (2013), Smyth & Helways
- E.D. Martin, "Colossians and Philemon", pp.215~216 (1993), Herald Press
- B.J. Nicholls, "Colossians & Philemon", pp.194~ (2005), Asian Theological Association
- W. Hendriksen, "A Commentary on Colossians and Philemon", pp.131~132 (1964), The Banner of Truth Trust