본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초기 기독교의 성결 담론: 바울의 ‘성결론’을 중심으로

Early Christian Discourse on Holiness: A Theory of Pauline Holiness

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Early Christian Discourse on Holiness: A Theory of Pauline Holiness Jeongsoo Park (Sungkyul University) This research aims to study Paul’s discourse on holiness through his terminology a`giwsu,nh and its synonyms, primarily found in Romans and other Pauline epistles related to our subject. Is it possible from the perspective of Paul to describe a ‘theology of holiness’? Paul’s eschatological schema about the resurrection of Jesus can be described through a typological approach. This covers his christology and ecclesiology as well as his soteriology. A correlation between the resurrected Son of God and the sons of God is elucidated through the “Spirit of Holiness”(Rom 1:4). Paul has received this formulation “according to the spirit of holiness”(kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj) from the early Christian tradition. Paul explains the Gospel “about His Son”(Rom 1:2): God resurrected Jesus “evx avnas,tasewj nekrw/n”(1:4) which could be translated not as “because he was raised from death,” but as “by the resurrection from the dead.” The resurrection of Jesus was the first-fruit “according to the Spirit of Holiness”(kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj); this is the same for the second fruit, the resurrection of the people of God by the time of ‘eschaton.’ The homogeneity between the first and the second fruit guarantees an eschatological continuity in the history of salvation. Paul explains: “And not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies”(Rom. 8:23). “The Spirit of Holiness” is the Holy Spirit given by God as His guarantee(avrrabw,n, 2Cor. 1:22; 5:5) as well as “Spirit of adoption”(pneu/ma ui`oqesi,aj( Rom. 8:15). The eschatological redemption of the people of God gets underway by the Holy Spirit from their experience on the first-fruit; the same Spirit, the Spirit of Holiness completed the second-fruit. Therefore, the way of Jesus kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj gives the ‘tu,poj’ for the life as the sons of God: suffering, death, and resurrection. A journey for the second-fruit of resurrection is that very thing “according to the spirit of holiness.” They are called to this redemptive way described as ‘being holy’: “For God has not called us for impurity, in holiness”(evn a`giasmw|, Thess. 4:7). ‘Holiness’ by the Holy Spirit is the will of God(Thess. 4:3) who journeys with His people for their resurrection.

Abstract

Early Christian Discourse on Holiness: A Theory of Pauline Holiness Jeongsoo Park (Sungkyul University) This research aims to study Paul’s discourse on holiness through his terminology a`giwsu,nh and its synonyms, primarily found in Romans and other Pauline epistles related to our subject. Is it possible from the perspective of Paul to describe a ‘theology of holiness’? Paul’s eschatological schema about the resurrection of Jesus can be described through a typological approach. This covers his christology and ecclesiology as well as his soteriology. A correlation between the resurrected Son of God and the sons of God is elucidated through the “Spirit of Holiness”(Rom 1:4). Paul has received this formulation “according to the spirit of holiness”(kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj) from the early Christian tradition. Paul explains the Gospel “about His Son”(Rom 1:2): God resurrected Jesus “evx avnas,tasewj nekrw/n”(1:4) which could be translated not as “because he was raised from death,” but as “by the resurrection from the dead.” The resurrection of Jesus was the first-fruit “according to the Spirit of Holiness”(kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj); this is the same for the second fruit, the resurrection of the people of God by the time of ‘eschaton.’ The homogeneity between the first and the second fruit guarantees an eschatological continuity in the history of salvation. Paul explains: “And not only so, but we ourselves, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies”(Rom. 8:23). “The Spirit of Holiness” is the Holy Spirit given by God as His guarantee(avrrabw,n, 2Cor. 1:22; 5:5) as well as “Spirit of adoption”(pneu/ma ui`oqesi,aj( Rom. 8:15). The eschatological redemption of the people of God gets underway by the Holy Spirit from their experience on the first-fruit; the same Spirit, the Spirit of Holiness completed the second-fruit. Therefore, the way of Jesus kata. pneu/ma a`giwsu,nhj gives the ‘tu,poj’ for the life as the sons of God: suffering, death, and resurrection. A journey for the second-fruit of resurrection is that very thing “according to the spirit of holiness.” They are called to this redemptive way described as ‘being holy’: “For God has not called us for impurity, in holiness”(evn a`giasmw|, Thess. 4:7). ‘Holiness’ by the Holy Spirit is the will of God(Thess. 4:3) who journeys with His people for their resurrection.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. H. Procksch, "ThWNT I", pp.87~116
  2. N. T. Wright, "신약성서와 하나님의 백성" (2003), 크리스챤 다이제스트
  3. 박정수, "기독교신학의 뿌리" (2008), 대한기독교서회
  4. 박정수, "성서로 본 통일신학", pp.66~72 (2010), 서울(한국성서학연구소)
  5. James M. Scott, "Adoption as Sons of God" (1992), Mohr Siebeck
  6. W. Trilling, "Das Wahre Israel: Studien zur Theologie des Matthäusevangeliums" (1959), St. Benno
  7. J. Jervell, "Die Apostelsgeschichte" (1998), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  8. J. Jervell, "사도행전 신학" (2000), 한들
  9. D. Wenham, "바울: 예수의 추종자인가 기독교의 창시자인가?" (2002), 크리스챤 다이제스트
  10. I. Howard Marshall, "사도행전·로마서", pp.297~300 (2012), CLC
  11. Strong, "New Testament Dictionary"
  12. Kaesemann, "로마서" (1982), 한국신학연구소
  13. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, "Romans" (1993), Double Day
  14. James D. G. Dunn, "로마서 1-8" (2003)
  15. Gordon D. Fee, "성령: 하나님이 주시는 임재(상)" (2013), 새물결플러스
  16. N. T Wright, "로마서" (2014), 에클레시아북스
  17. R. Jewett, "Romans(Hermeneia)", pp.98~ (2007), Portress Press
  18. 박익수, "로마서주석 I" (2008), 대한기독교서회
  19. Ulich Wilkens, "Der Brief an die Römer" (1987), Neukirchener Verlag
  20. G. D. Fee, "God's Empowering presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul", pp.483~ (1984), Hendrickson
  21. R. H. Charles, "The Greek Versions of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs", pp.64~ (1960), Oxford University Press
  22. Wuest, "Romans, 21", ~
  23. Ben Witherrington III, "New Testament Rhetoric: An Introductory Guide to the Art of Persuasion", pp.132~145 (2009), Cascade
  24. H. D. Betz, "2Cor. 6:14-7:1: An Anti-Pauline Fragment", JBL, 92, pp.88~108 (1973)
  25. Raymond E. Brown, "신약개론", pp.763~764 (2003), CLC
  26. Ben Witherington III, "Conflict & Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1. and 2. Corinthians" (1995), Erdmans
  27. Murphy-O’Connor, "Relating 2 Corinthians 6:14-7:1 to Its Context", NTS, 33, pp.272~275 (1987)
  28. Gordon D. Fee, "2.Corinthians 6:14-7:1 and Food Offered to Idols", NTS, 23, pp.140~161 (1976)
  29. M. E. Thrall, "The Problem od 2Cor. 6:14-7:1. in Some Recent Discussions", NTS, 24, pp.132~148 (1977)
  30. James M. Scott, "The Use of Scripture in 2 Corinthians 6.16c-18 and Paul's Restoration Theology", JSNT, 17(56), pp.73~99
  31. Gordon D. Fee, "바울의 기독론", pp.391~392 (2009), CLC
  32. F. F. Bruce, "데살로니가전후서" (1999), 솔로몬
  33. W. Marxen, "데살로니카전후서", pp.92~94 (1986), 한국신학연구소
  34. Yan Thomas, "가족의 역사" (2001), 이학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)