Analysis of Relative Importance for Improvement of Cooperative System of Counter Terrorism Related Agencies
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the enactment of the “Act on the Prevention of Terrorism for Public Protection and Public Safety”, the relative importance analysis was conducted focusing on the opinions of experts on the existing improvement measures for improving the cooperation system between counter-terrorism agencies. In the results of the analysis, first of all, from the results of analyzing the relative importance of the experts on the policy factors for improving the cooperative system between counter-terrorism agencies, the operational factors were given the first priority at 45.8%, and the improvement of legislative and organizational factors was given the second priority at 44.7%. In addition, the environmental factors were presented as the 3rd priority at 9.5%. Next, the results of analyzing the relative importance of sub-policy factors targeting experts are as follows. First, in terms of legislative and organizational factors, 37.8% recognized that the establishment of an agency for cooperation was the top priority, the most urgently needed. Second, in terms of operational factors, the provision of inter-agency coordination measures, such as the integrated command system, was regarded as the first priority at 47.1%. Third, in terms of environmental factors, it was confirmed that the creation of an organizational climate for cooperation was the first priority at 57%.
Abstract
After the enactment of the “Act on the Prevention of Terrorism for Public Protection and Public Safety”, the relative importance analysis was conducted focusing on the opinions of experts on the existing improvement measures for improving the cooperation system between counter-terrorism agencies. In the results of the analysis, first of all, from the results of analyzing the relative importance of the experts on the policy factors for improving the cooperative system between counter-terrorism agencies, the operational factors were given the first priority at 45.8%, and the improvement of legislative and organizational factors was given the second priority at 44.7%. In addition, the environmental factors were presented as the 3rd priority at 9.5%. Next, the results of analyzing the relative importance of sub-policy factors targeting experts are as follows. First, in terms of legislative and organizational factors, 37.8% recognized that the establishment of an agency for cooperation was the top priority, the most urgently needed. Second, in terms of operational factors, the provision of inter-agency coordination measures, such as the integrated command system, was regarded as the first priority at 47.1%. Third, in terms of environmental factors, it was confirmed that the creation of an organizational climate for cooperation was the first priority at 57%.
참고문헌 (5)
- 이대성, "현행 「국가대테러활동지침」에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국테러학회보, 7(1), pp.133~146 (2014), 한국테러학회
- 이대성, "테러방지법안의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 토지공법연구, 43(3), pp.429~450 (2009), 한국토지공법학회
- 제성호, "독일의 테러방지법과 테러대응기구", 法學論文集, 41(1), pp.71~107 (2017), 법학연구원[DOI]
- Jennings, Edward T. Jr., "Building Bridges in the Intergovernmental Arena: Coordination Employment and Training Programs in the American States", Public Administration Review, 54(1), pp.52~60 (1994)
- 이재은, "재난관리에서의 민·관·군 협력체계 구축 방안: Jennings 접근법을 중심으로", Crisisonomy, 3(1), pp.62~74 (2007), (사)위기관리이론과실천