A Study on Improvement of Information Sharing on TERROR CRIME
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The terrorist attacks in France and Belgium in November 2015 and March 2016 give us clear and important implications. That is, the importance of information sharing between intelligence agencies and investigation agencies. This is because both the terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and the terror attacks in Belgium in 2016 are information failures due to information sharing and failure to analyze shared information. Although the Republic of Korea continued to submit the Anti-Terrorism Act to the National Assembly, it failed to pass the voices of various toxic clauses and concerns about the strengthening of the powers of state institutions. After the intense discussions in early 2016, Korea has enacted and enforced the Anti-Terrorism Act in 2016, but it remains vague with regard to information sharing, especially between information agencies and information agencies. In other words, the Korea Anti-Terrorism Act focuses on strengthening the authority of the intelligence agencies to prevent terrorism from the point of view that prevention of terrorism is important. However, in order to prevent the identification of the substantive truth after the terrorist crime and the anticipated second attack, the investigation right of the investigation agency needs to be guaranteed. However, the Anti-Terrorism Act does not pay any attention to strengthening the investigation capabilities of these investigative institutions, and it inevitably stipulates superficially sharing information to the investigative institutions. In order to systematically assure the information sharing system of the investigation agencies based on foreign experience, 1)Domestic terrorism information should be based on the basic information of KICS, which can be handled by the Crime Information Office of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office, And 2)the International Terrorist Information Office proposed an amendment that systematically guarantees the delivery of terrorist information to the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office by the counter - terrorism center under the Office of the Prime Minister's Office.
Abstract
The terrorist attacks in France and Belgium in November 2015 and March 2016 give us clear and important implications. That is, the importance of information sharing between intelligence agencies and investigation agencies. This is because both the terrorist attacks in France in 2015 and the terror attacks in Belgium in 2016 are information failures due to information sharing and failure to analyze shared information. Although the Republic of Korea continued to submit the Anti-Terrorism Act to the National Assembly, it failed to pass the voices of various toxic clauses and concerns about the strengthening of the powers of state institutions. After the intense discussions in early 2016, Korea has enacted and enforced the Anti-Terrorism Act in 2016, but it remains vague with regard to information sharing, especially between information agencies and information agencies. In other words, the Korea Anti-Terrorism Act focuses on strengthening the authority of the intelligence agencies to prevent terrorism from the point of view that prevention of terrorism is important. However, in order to prevent the identification of the substantive truth after the terrorist crime and the anticipated second attack, the investigation right of the investigation agency needs to be guaranteed. However, the Anti-Terrorism Act does not pay any attention to strengthening the investigation capabilities of these investigative institutions, and it inevitably stipulates superficially sharing information to the investigative institutions. In order to systematically assure the information sharing system of the investigation agencies based on foreign experience, 1)Domestic terrorism information should be based on the basic information of KICS, which can be handled by the Crime Information Office of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office, And 2)the International Terrorist Information Office proposed an amendment that systematically guarantees the delivery of terrorist information to the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office by the counter - terrorism center under the Office of the Prime Minister's Office.
참고문헌 (9)
- Liam S, "How Belgium Became Home to Recent Terror Plots", The NY Times, ~ (2016)
- Kang DC, "A Study on the Anti-terrorism in Korea", Master's
- Youm DJ, "A Comparative Study on the Parliamentary Control System over Intelligence Organizations and Its Practices", Korea Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), pp.163~191 (2003)
- 나영민, "형사사법절차 전자화의 쟁점과 그 해결방안", 성균관법학, 26(2), pp.123~144 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 김택수, "프랑스 정보경찰의 개혁과 갈등조정 역할에 관한 연구", 경찰법연구, 12(1), pp.237~260 (2014), 한국경찰법학회[DOI]
- Kent R, "Comparative Counter-terrorism Law" (2015), Cambridge