하나님의 진노는 현재적인가
God’s Wrath Now? - An Exegetical Reconsideration
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Paul’s reference to the revelation of God’s wrath in Romans 1:18 is typically interpreted as denoting a present manifestation of God’s wrath,with the verb taken to be present progressive rather than futuristic. For this,scholars normally appeal to the present tense of the verb avpokalu,ptetai and the close parallelism between v. 17 and v. 18. Together with this, the following description of moral depravity is also taken to be the evidence for the reality of God’s wrath. This paper attempts to expose various exegetical problems this ‘present’interpretation creates and thereby demonstrate that the futuristic construal of the verse is the best way to go. The major problems discussed in this study are 1) the spuriousness of appealing to the present tense of the verb; 2) the problem of interpreting v. 18 in the light of an already biased understanding of v. 17, especially in relation to the tense of the righteousness language in Romans; 3) the problems of taking God’s action of “handing over”and the necessary “reward/punishment”as concrete manifestations of God’s wrath. The paper then offers a critique of various attempts to relating the present and future aspects of God’s wrath, showing the exegetical and logical problems those construals create within the immediate context and in Paul’s theology as a whole. All these problems, so concludes the paper, simply disappear when one takes the revelation of God’s wrath as referring to God’s final judgment, thereby confirming the conclusion reached by H. J. Eckstein some twenty five years ago.
Abstract
Paul’s reference to the revelation of God’s wrath in Romans 1:18 is typically interpreted as denoting a present manifestation of God’s wrath,with the verb taken to be present progressive rather than futuristic. For this,scholars normally appeal to the present tense of the verb avpokalu,ptetai and the close parallelism between v. 17 and v. 18. Together with this, the following description of moral depravity is also taken to be the evidence for the reality of God’s wrath. This paper attempts to expose various exegetical problems this ‘present’interpretation creates and thereby demonstrate that the futuristic construal of the verse is the best way to go. The major problems discussed in this study are 1) the spuriousness of appealing to the present tense of the verb; 2) the problem of interpreting v. 18 in the light of an already biased understanding of v. 17, especially in relation to the tense of the righteousness language in Romans; 3) the problems of taking God’s action of “handing over”and the necessary “reward/punishment”as concrete manifestations of God’s wrath. The paper then offers a critique of various attempts to relating the present and future aspects of God’s wrath, showing the exegetical and logical problems those construals create within the immediate context and in Paul’s theology as a whole. All these problems, so concludes the paper, simply disappear when one takes the revelation of God’s wrath as referring to God’s final judgment, thereby confirming the conclusion reached by H. J. Eckstein some twenty five years ago.
참고문헌 (27)
- 권연경, "로마서 산책", pp.47~60 (2010), 복 있는 사람
- 김현광, "“복음 전하기를 원하노라”: 로마서 1장 14-17절의 논리적 구조와 의미", 신약연구, 10(3), pp.545~570 (2011), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 로마서 5:1-21의 수사학적 기능을 고려한 로마서 1:1-5:21의 수사학적 분석 (A Rhetorical Analysis of Romans 1:1-5:21 with Attention Given to the Rhetorical Function of 5:1-21), "신약연구", 2009, 155~178, pp.한국복음주의신약학회
- Robert Jewett, "Romans–A Commentary", pp.151~ (2007), Fortress
- J. D. G. Dunn, "Romans I", pp.54~ (1988), Word
- Keck, "Romans", pp.57~58 (2005), Abingdon Press
- Schreiner, "Romans", pp.84~85 (1998), Baker
- John Murray, "The Epistle to the Romans", pp.35~36 (1968), Eerdmans
- Markus Bockmuehl, "Revelation and Mystery in Ancient Judaism and Pauline Christianity", pp.141~ (1997), Eerdmans
- H.-J. Eckstein, "Denn Gottes Zorn wird vom Himmel her offenbar werden’: Exegetische Erwägungen zu Röm 1,18", ZNW, 78, pp.74~89 (1987)
- Jonathan A. Linebaugh, "Announcing the Human: Rethinking the Relationship Between Wisdom of Solomon 13-15 and Romans 1.18-2.11", New Testament Studies, 57, pp.214~234 (2011)
- Brendan Byrne, "Romans", pp.66~ (1996), Liturgical Press
- Ernst Käsemann, "Commentary on Romans", pp.47~ (1994), Eerdmans
- C. E. B. Cranfield, "Romans I", pp.127~ (1975), T&T Clark
- J. R. Edwards, "Romans", pp.56~ (1992), Hendrickson
- Osborne, "Romans", pp.54~ (2004), IVP
- Douglas Moo, "The Epistle to the Romans", pp.116~117 (1996), Eerdmans
- Eckstein, "Gottes Zorn", ZNW, 78, pp.74~89 (1987)
- Daniel B. Wallace, "Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics : An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament", pp.513~539 (1996), Zondervan
- F. A. Philippi, "Kommentar über den Brief Pauli and die Römer", pp.22~ (1896), Gütersloh
- Ulrich Wilckens, "Der Brief an die Römer", pp.101~ (1978), Neukirchener
- N. T. Wright, "Romans, In New Interpreter’s Bible", pp.434~ (2002), Abingdon
- W. Sanday, "A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans", pp.41~ (1902), T&T Clark
- E. Kühl, "Der Brief an die Römer", pp.46~ (1913), Quell & Meyer
- Paul Hammer, "The Revelation of God’s Wrath: Romans 1-3, In Early Christian Experience", pp.47~70 (1969), SCM
- P. Stuhlmcher, "The Epistle to the Romans : A Commentary", pp.39~40 (1994), Westminster
- Ben Witherington III, "Paul’s Letter to the Romans : A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary", pp.64~65 (2004), Eerdmans