본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Why Does Socialization Matter? : Analyzing the Impact of Socialization and Risk Perception on Energy Saving Behavior

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of energy saving behavior. This study aims to analyse the factors that influence energy saving behavior with a focus on socialization factors. Social factors are fundamental determinants of energy behavior, but there has been a lack of systematic research on them. According to the results of the survey data, first, the influence of socialization factors is in the order of peer group > parent > experience. In order to strengthen learning in energy conservation in social relationships, it is necessary to use educational communities in the community where peers can exchange experiences. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen parental education to reinforce education at home and to expand the number of experience facilities where people can experience energy conservation. Second, in the risk perception paradigm, perceived benefits > subjective knowledge > trust > perceived risk affect energy conservation in the order of perceived benefits > subjective knowledge > trust > perceived risk. Although these variables have a great influence on energy conservation, these factors are closely related to socialization factors, so strategies to improve perceived risk, benefits, knowledge, and trust using socialization factors are necessary.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of energy saving behavior. This study aims to analyse the factors that influence energy saving behavior with a focus on socialization factors. Social factors are fundamental determinants of energy behavior, but there has been a lack of systematic research on them. According to the results of the survey data, first, the influence of socialization factors is in the order of peer group > parent > experience. In order to strengthen learning in energy conservation in social relationships, it is necessary to use educational communities in the community where peers can exchange experiences. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen parental education to reinforce education at home and to expand the number of experience facilities where people can experience energy conservation. Second, in the risk perception paradigm, perceived benefits > subjective knowledge > trust > perceived risk affect energy conservation in the order of perceived benefits > subjective knowledge > trust > perceived risk. Although these variables have a great influence on energy conservation, these factors are closely related to socialization factors, so strategies to improve perceived risk, benefits, knowledge, and trust using socialization factors are necessary.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Adepoju, Adeyemi, "Household Energy Conservation Behavior: A Socioeconomic Perspective", Journal of Digital Food, Energy & Water Systems, 4(1), pp.1~24 (2023)[DOI]
  2. Aguirre-Bielschowsky, I., "Kids and Kilowatts: Socialization, Energy Efficiency, and Electricity Consumption in New Zealand", Energy Research & Social Science, 44, pp.178~186 (2018)
  3. Amador, F. J., "Supplier Choice and WTP for Electricity Attributes in an Emerging Market : The Role of Perceived Past Experience, Environmental Concern and Energy Saving Behavior", Energy Economics, 40, pp.953~966 (2013)
  4. Bae, Jin-Ho, "Effects of Pre-service Elementary Teachers'Energy Conservation-related Attitudes and Behaviors on Their Major Enrichment Course", ~ (2016)
  5. Baker, C. W., "Predicting Adolescent Eating and Activity Behaviors: The Role of Social Norms and Personal Agency", Health Psychology, 22, pp.189~198 (2003)
  6. Bandura, A, "Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective", Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), pp.1~26 (2001)
  7. Carrico, A. R., "Motivating Energy Conservation in the Workplace : An Evaluation of the Use of Group-level Feedback and Peer Education", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), pp.1~13 (2011)
  8. Carrus, G., "Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior : A Meta-analytic Approach", Frontiers in Psychology, 12, pp.648221~ (2021)
  9. Cialdini, R. B., "A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct : Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp.1015~1026 (1990)
  10. "Statistical Review of World Energy" (2024)[URL]
  11. Fell, M. J., "Children, Parents and Home Energy Use : Exploring Motivations and Limits to Energy Demand Reduction", Energy Policy, 65, pp.351~358 (2014)
  12. Gill, C., "Learn to Conserve : The Effects of In-School Energy Education on At-Home Electricity Consumption", Energy Policy, 118, pp.88~96 (2018)
  13. Guagnano, G. A., "Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships : A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling", Environment and Behavior, 27(5), pp.699~718 (1995)
  14. Huang, J., "What’s the Difference between Factors Influencing Household Waste Management and Energy-saving Behavior? A Meta-analysis", Management of Environmental Quality : An International Journal, 35(8), pp.1953~1976 (2024)
  15. Jain, R. K., "Can Social Influence Drive Energy Savings? Detecting the Impact of Social Influence on the Energy Consumption Behavior of Networked Users Exposed to Normative Eco-feedback", Energy and Buildings, 66, pp.119~127 (2013)
  16. Kang, Young-Sik, "Effects of Parents'Energy Conservation Awareness and Behavior on Children's Eco-attitudes and Environmental Conservation Knowledge", Journal of the Korean Society of Industrial Economics and Technology, 14(10), pp.4819~4829 (2013)
  17. Kim, Seo-Yong, "Antecedents of Public Service Motivation(PSM) : A Comparative Analysis of Socialization Factors", Korean Journal of Public Administration, 44(1), pp.147~177 (2010)
  18. Landis, J, "Sociology: Concepts and Charateristics" (1989), Wadsorth
  19. Macey, S. M., "Residential Energy Conservation : The Role of Past Experience in Repetitive Household Behavior", Environment and Behavior, 15(2), pp.123~141 (1983)
  20. Olsen, M. E, "Consumers' Attitudes toward Energy Conservation", Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), pp.108~131 (1981)
  21. Pals, H., "Residential Energy Conservation : the Effects of Education and Perceived Behavioral Control", Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5, pp.29~41 (2015)
  22. "CO₂ emissions" (2020)[URL]
  23. Slovic, P., "Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm", ~ (1992)
  24. Starr, P., "Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk", Science, 165, pp.1232~1238 (1969)
  25. Suryawanshi, P., "Relationship of Socio Economic Factors(SEF)and Energy Conservation Behav ior in India : Empirical Study", IRA International Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 4(1), pp.15~21 (2016)[DOI]
  26. "Annual Global Emissions of Carbon Dioxide 1940-2023" (2024)[URL]
  27. Urban, J., "Exploring Domestic Energy-saving : The Role of Environmental Concern and Background Variables", Energy Policy, 47, pp.69~80 (2012)
  28. Wallis, H., "The Transmission of Energy-saving Behaviors in the Family : A Multilevel Approach to the Assessment of Aggregated and Single Energy-saving Actions of Parents and Adolescents", Environment and Behavior, 52(3), pp.275~304 (2020)
  29. "Total Energy Consumption" (2024)[URL]
  30. Yun, G. Y., "Behavioral, Physical and Socio-economic Factors in Household Cooling Energy Consumption", Applied Energy, 88(6), pp.2191~2200 (2011)
  31. Zhu, J., "The Influence of Group-level Factors on Individual Energy-saving Behaviors in a Shared Space : The Case of Shared Residences", Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, pp.127560~ (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)