본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Exploratory Analysis on the Concept and Issue of 'Regulatory Void': Focusing on the Drone Sector

황희영|최종민
(사)위기관리이론과실천 (Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis)|2022.08|Journal of Safety and Crisis Management|제12권 제8호|pp. 9-15|DOI http://doi.org/10.14251/jscm.2022.8.9

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

droneregulatory reformnegative regulationregulatory void

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the current situation of regulatory void and related major issues. For this purpose, this study scrutinizes the actual situation of regulatory void in the drone industry by using legal analysis and literature research methods. The results are as follows: First, compared to the technology development of drones, the issue of regulatory void in the commercial use was found to be more prominent. Compared to the past, as the weight and control qualifications of drones were eased, the technology development of drones has been further promoted. On the other hand, in commercial use of drones such as drone taxis, leisure drones, and drone delivery services, there are many issues to be solved along with the various legal absence. Second, it was found that the regulatory void of drones requires revision of various laws. There was a gap in regulations related to actual commercial applications. The results of this study suggest that new standards need to be established to meet the growing demand in the drone industry.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the current situation of regulatory void and related major issues. For this purpose, this study scrutinizes the actual situation of regulatory void in the drone industry by using legal analysis and literature research methods. The results are as follows: First, compared to the technology development of drones, the issue of regulatory void in the commercial use was found to be more prominent. Compared to the past, as the weight and control qualifications of drones were eased, the technology development of drones has been further promoted. On the other hand, in commercial use of drones such as drone taxis, leisure drones, and drone delivery services, there are many issues to be solved along with the various legal absence. Second, it was found that the regulatory void of drones requires revision of various laws. There was a gap in regulations related to actual commercial applications. The results of this study suggest that new standards need to be established to meet the growing demand in the drone industry.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Baek, Jong Hyun, "Current Status and Future Challenges of Technology Regulation Response Activities in Korea: Focusing on Investigating and Improving Technology Regulation Difficulties in Korea", Korean Standards Association, 5(14), pp.1~30 (2015)
  2. 조상덕, "드론산업의 경제적 파급효과 분석- 산업연관분석을 중심으로 -", 한국항공경영학회지, 15(6), pp.17~31 (2017), 한국항공경영학회
  3. 최자성, "드론 택시의 법적 정의 및 법제화 방안 논의", 한국항행학회논문지, 24(6), pp.491~499 (2020), 한국항행학회
  4. 최진욱, "규제가 국가경쟁력에 미치는 영향: OECD 국가를 중심으로", 규제연구, 15(1), pp.3~25 (2006), 한국규제학회
  5. Analysis of the Policy Environment in the Field of Drone, Robot, and Artificial Intelligence in Daejeon, "Choi, Jong Min", Daejeon Institute of Science and Technology for Enterprise and People, 1~240 (2021)
  6. Choi, Jong Min, "The Role of Local Actors in Spatial Agglomeration of Innovative Activities: Evidence from 3D Printing", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(11), pp.1353~1365 (2020)
  7. Freeman, J., "Improving Interagency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space", Administrative & Regulatory Law News, 38, pp.11~14 (2012)
  8. Haidari, L. A., "The Economic and Operational Value of Using Drones to Transport Vaccines", Vaccine, 34(34), pp.4062~4067 (2016)
  9. 홍명수, "OTT 규제에 관한 검토", 명지법학, 18(1), pp.33~50 (2019), 법학연구소
  10. A Study on Consumer Protection Measures in the Drone Market, "Hwang, Mi Jin", Korea Consumer Agency, 1~227 (2016)
  11. 조준모, "드론택배 통신망시스템을 위한 효율적인 MANET 라우팅 프로토콜", 한국전자통신학회 논문지, 10(9), pp.973~978 (2015), 한국전자통신학회
  12. 김희경, "선택형 서비스로서의 양방향 방송광고에 대한 법적 규제의 타당성 고찰", 한국방송학보, 24(4), pp.47~86 (2010), 한국방송학회
  13. An Economic Analysis of the Sharing Economy: Benefits, Concerns and Policy Implications, "Kim, Min Jung", KDI, ~, pp.KDI Research Monograph Paper No. 2016-11 (2016)
  14. 김순자, "드론 택배 도입을 위한 각국의 정책과 발전방안에 대한 연구", 물류학회지, 26(1), pp.27~38 (2016), 한국물류학회[DOI]
  15. 김선아, "나노물질 안전관리 동향 및 제도 도입에 관한 고찰", 환경정책연구, 12(3), pp.49~71 (2013), 한국환경연구원[DOI]
  16. 김성미, "드론의 현행 법적 정의와 상업적 운용에 따른 문제점", 항공우주정책 ·법학회지, 33(1), pp.3~43 (2018), 한국항공우주정책⋅법학회[DOI]
  17. Kim, Tae Eun, "The Political Economy of Regulation" (2021), Dae-Young
  18. 김태오, "제4차 산업혁명의 견인을 위한 규제패러다임 모색 : 한국의 규제패러다임을 중심으로", 경제규제와 법, 10(2), pp.140~168 (2017), 법학연구소
  19. Korea Institute for Industrial, Economics & Trade, "Global Competitiveness of Major New Industries in Terms of Global Market Share", Future Strategic Industry Brief, 24, pp.1~75 (2022)
  20. Korea's Smart Regulation Strategies for Regional Development in the Era of 4th Industrial Revolution, "Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements", ~ (2018)
  21. Krey, M., "Usage and Acceptance of Drone Technology in Healthcare: Exploring Patients and Physicians Perspective", 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp.4135~4144 (2019), University of Hawaii at Manoa
  22. Lee, Im Geol, "A Debate about the Change of Drone Rules", Korea Drone Studies, 1(1), pp.3~38 (2018)
  23. 이광호, "기술규제, 사례와 정책적 시사점", 경제규제와 법, 9(2), pp.143~160 (2016), 법학연구소
  24. Lee, Kwang Ho, "Tasks for Public Sector Reform in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution", Public Economy, 8, pp.17~19 (2021)
  25. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Press Release:Announcing Plans to Strengthen the Competitiveness of the Drone Industry and Holding a Drone Fair", ~ (2021)
  26. Current Status and Implications of the Sharing Economy in the US, Europe, and China, "Na, Seung Kwon", KIEP, 1~161, pp.Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. 17(10) (2017)
  27. Pardhasaradhi, N., "Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security", pp.983~988 (2021), Springer
  28. Related Ministries Joint, "Preemptive Regulatory Reform Roadmap -Drone Area", ~ (2019)
  29. Related Ministries Joint, "A Plan to Strengthen the Competitiveness of the Drone Industry", ~ (2021)
  30. Sarewitz, D., "The Growing Gap between Emerging Technologies and Legal-ethical Oversight", pp.95~105 (2011), Springer
  31. Savolainen, K., "Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies―a Review", Toxicology, 269(2-3), pp.92~104 (2010)
  32. 손금주, "방송ㆍ통신 융합서비스에 대한 규제체계", 경제규제와 법, 6(2), pp.126~139 (2013), 법학연구소
  33. Thiels, C. A., "Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Medical Product Transport", Air Medical Journal, 34(2), pp.104~108 (2015)
  34. 원소연, "다(多)부처규제 협업강화를 위한 규제개혁제도 개선방안", 국가정책연구, 33(4), pp.1~28 (2019), 국가정책연구소[DOI]
  35. Yoon, Ja Young, "Current Status of Drones and Deregulation Policies : Focusing on Commercial Drones", Monthly KIET Industrial Economy, 10, pp.1~19 (2016)
  36. Zettler, P. J., "Closing the Regulatory Gap for Synthetic Nicotine", Boston College Law Review, 59(6), pp.1933~1982 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

드론 정책 비교 연구이한영, 차성민한국비교정부학회 · 한국비교정부학보2016 · 제20권 제4호드론 규제입법 개선에 관한 연구박준혁, 이민형한국경찰연구학회 · 한국경찰연구2020 · 제19권 제4호드론 물류산업의 분쟁해결과 정책적 과제박종삼한국중재학회 · 중재연구2016 · 제26권 제4호A Study on Drone’s Liability on Flight in South Korea곽영암한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2016 · 제14권 제3호UAV 산업 경쟁력 강화를 위한 규제 정책 방향성 고찰 : 글로벌 사례와 SWOT 분석을 중심으로안홍환, 정예림, 황민호한국전문경영인학회 · 전문경영인연구2024 · 제27권 제4호레저 활동으로서 드론 운용과 관련된 쟁점에 관한 연구박찬민한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회 · 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법2016 · 제19권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

Analysis of High-risk Areas by Typology of Causes of Death정찬미, 전미선pp. 1-7A Study on the Differences between Indoor Job and Outside Job on the Factors of Health Disability in Fire Officials송용선, 임동균pp. 17-27The Critical Review of the Discourse of North Korean Human Rights and International Anti-corruption: Focused on the Paradox of Human Rights and Sovereignty류상일, 나혜영pp. 29-38The Development of an Instrument That Measures Seogeulpeum in Korean Middle-aged Adults은영, 구혜자pp. 39-49
원문 보기