본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조어대(센카쿠열도)의 영유권 분쟁과 당사국간 법리에 관한 연구

Study on the Dispute for the Dominium of Diàoyútái(Senkaku Islands) and Legal Principles between the Countries Concerned

양희철|김진욱
한국해양과학기술원 (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)|2014.09|Ocean and Polar Research|제36권 제3호|pp. 255-276|DOI dx.doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2014.36.3.255

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

DokdoSan Francisco Peace TreatyEast China SeaDiaoyutai(Senkaku)Maritime Boundary Delimitation
주제분류해양학

초록

The dispute between China and Japan regarding Diaoyutai is believed to be quite similar to the controversy surrounding Dokdo in terms of historical and post-war processes except for the point that the phenomena of occupation is different with regard to Dokdo. China's claim to Diaoyutai is based on historical title and continuous use while the basis of Japan's claim is summarized as preoccupancy of ownerless land. Even though Japan acknowledges that China discovered Diaoyutai, Japan claims that the act to establish sovereignty over the island from the standpoint of International Law was not taken by China. However, at that time, effective occupation was not an essential prerequisite for the acquisition of a territory. That is to say, from a legal perspective, the legal right for an area could be established based on the discovery of the land, and so it is thought that Japan is applying the current criteria of International Law in a manner that is inappropriate. When we review the post-war process, the San Francisco Peace Treaty does not directly mention Diaoyutai. But based on the said treaty, we can note that Japan gave up all rights for the southern area that is north of the boundary line that equates to latitude 29o and that includes the Ryuku Islands and Diaoyutai. Of course, the provisions for the territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and its disposal are not the final factor for the judgment regarding dominium of Diaoyutai. However, it seems clear that Japan's attitude and interpretation regarding the issues of Diaoyutai, the Kuril Islands and Dokdo is problematic.

Abstract

The dispute between China and Japan regarding Diaoyutai is believed to be quite similar to the controversy surrounding Dokdo in terms of historical and post-war processes except for the point that the phenomena of occupation is different with regard to Dokdo. China's claim to Diaoyutai is based on historical title and continuous use while the basis of Japan's claim is summarized as preoccupancy of ownerless land. Even though Japan acknowledges that China discovered Diaoyutai, Japan claims that the act to establish sovereignty over the island from the standpoint of International Law was not taken by China. However, at that time, effective occupation was not an essential prerequisite for the acquisition of a territory. That is to say, from a legal perspective, the legal right for an area could be established based on the discovery of the land, and so it is thought that Japan is applying the current criteria of International Law in a manner that is inappropriate. When we review the post-war process, the San Francisco Peace Treaty does not directly mention Diaoyutai. But based on the said treaty, we can note that Japan gave up all rights for the southern area that is north of the boundary line that equates to latitude 29o and that includes the Ryuku Islands and Diaoyutai. Of course, the provisions for the territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and its disposal are not the final factor for the judgment regarding dominium of Diaoyutai. However, it seems clear that Japan's attitude and interpretation regarding the issues of Diaoyutai, the Kuril Islands and Dokdo is problematic.

참고문헌 (78)

  1. 배진수, "세계의 도서분쟁과 독도 시나리오", pp.55~ (1997), 한국군사문제연구소
  2. 양희철, "해양정책 I2", pp.14~15 (2012), 한국해양과학기술원
  3. 오윤경, "現代 國際法", pp.844~ (2001), 박영사
  4. 이용희, "국제판례상 실효적 지배의 개념과 독도에 관한 고찰", Ocean and Polar Research, 35(4), pp.313~322 (2013), 한국해양과학기술원[DOI]
  5. 丘宏達, "關於中國領土的國際法問題論文集", pp.74~ (1975), 臺灣商務印書館
  6. 丘宏達, "釣魚台主權爭執問題及其解決方法的硏究", pp.21~23 (1996), 臺灣商務印書館發行
  7. 梁熙喆, "從國際海洋法劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ與大陸架劃界問題", 박사, pp.2006
  8. 杜之, "中外條約關係之變遷", pp.95~ (1981), 中央文物供應社
  9. 凌黔遵, "從國防觀點論釣魚台之主權與戰略價値", pp.22~ (1997), 東吳大學軍訓室
  10. 馬英九, "從新海洋法論釣魚台與東海劃界問題", pp.80~ (1986), 中正書局
  11. 朴春浩, "釣魚台之法律地位", pp.71~ (1998), 東吳大學法學院
  12. 盛承楠, "釣魚台採藥記", 學粹, 14(2), pp.58~ (1972)
  13. 梁敏錞, "開羅會議與中國", pp.43~ (1962), 亞洲出版社有限公司
  14. 楊仲揆, "釣魚台之法律地位", pp.6~7 (1998), 東吳大學法學院
  15. 吳靄華, "琉球歷史上的久米村", pp.107~ (1985), 國立臺灣師範大學歷史學報
  16. 吳天潁, "甲午戰前釣魚列嶼歸屬考-兼質日本奧原敏雄諸敎授 初版", pp.93~94 (1994), 中國社會科學文獻出版社
  17. 王曉波, "尙未完成的歷史-保釣二十五年 初版", pp.303~ (1996), 海峽學術出版社
  18. 宇佐美滋(日本每日新聞外信部), "釣魚台之法律地位", pp.337~ (1998), 東吳大學法學院
  19. 兪寬賜, "中國國際法學會與國際事務年報 第5卷" (1991), 臺灣商務印書館發行
  20. 劉本炎, "釣魚台究竟是什麻樣子", 臺灣中央日報, ~ (1970)
  21. 劉錫江, "臺灣行政院硏究發展考核委員會", pp.160~ (1992)
  22. 劉蕙孫, "浦添市 - 泉州市友好都市締結紀念學術文化討論會報告書", pp.85~99 (1987), 琉球 - 中國交流史をさぐる
  23. 林金莖, "戰後中日關係與國際法", pp.231~232 (1987), 中日關係硏究會
  24. 林田富, "釣魚台主權歸屬之硏究", pp.11~30 (1999), 五南圖書出版公司
  25. 張士, "我國對臺澎主權的法理依據", pp.23~ (1977), 中央文物供應社
  26. 蔣廷, "最近中國外交史資料輯要 中卷", pp.536~537 (1959), 臺灣商務印書館
  27. 傳啓學, "中國外交史", pp.571~ (1957)
  28. 陳汝勤, "釣魚台之法律地位", pp.87~ (1998), 東吳大學法學院
  29. 戚桐欣, "釣魚台群島", 中央日報, ~ (1970)
  30. 井上淸, "釣魚諸島(尖閣列島)的歷史和領有權(再論)", 中國硏究月報, ~ (1972)
  31. 井上淸, "尖閣列島-釣魚諸島の史的解明 初版", pp.82~ (1996), 第三書館
  32. 奧原敏雄, "動かめ尖閣列島の日本領有權 - 井上淸論文の「歷史虛構」をあばく", 朝日, 春季, 13(1), pp.92~ (1973)
  33. 三浦藤作, "歷代詔勅全集 第六卷", pp.269~ (1941), 河出書房
  34. 伊波普猷, "琉球史料叢書 第四冊", pp.11~ (1941), 名取書店
  35. 日本外務省, "日本外交文書 第十八卷", pp.575~ (1950), 日本國際連合協會發行
  36. 外務省, "日本外交表竝主要文書 1840-1945 上冊", pp.83~ (1965)
  37. 日本外務省, "尖閣諸島 について", pp.19~ (1972)
  38. 尾崎重義, "尖閣諸島の歸屬について. (下の二)", レファレンス, (263), pp.169~170 (1972)
  39. 尾崎重義, "尖閣諸島の歸屬について. (中)", レファレンス, (261), pp.47~56 (1972)
  40. 立 作太郞, "平時國際法論", pp.356~ (1934), 日本評論社
  41. 尖閣列島硏究會, "沖繩季刊 第56號", pp.9~10 (1971), 尖閣列島特集
  42. 喜舍場一隆, "尖閣諸島と冊封使錄. 南方同胞援護會", 沖繩季刊, (63), pp.60~ (1972), 南方同胞援護會
  43. Bishops WW, "Judicial Decisions", AJIL, 48, pp.316~326 (1954)
  44. Bosum W, "On the current geological knowledge of East China Sea and its petroleum potential", J Oil and Gas Geology, 9, pp.100~108 (1990)
  45. Cheng T, "The Sino-Japanese Dispute Over the Tiaoyu-tai(Senkaku) Islands and the Law of Territorial Acquisition", Va J Int Law, 14, pp.254~ (1974)
  46. Continental shelf issues in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea, "Park CH", Law of the Sea Institute University of Rhode Island, ~, pp.Occasional Paper No. 15 (1972)
  47. Park CH, "East Asia and the Law of the Sea", pp.33~ (1983), Seoul National University Press
  48. Choy KY, "Overview of Taiwan's Legal and Jurisdictional considerations in the Diaoyu", Senkaku Dispute, Senkaku Islands between Taiwan and Japan, Taiwan Yilan City, pp.1997[DOI]
  49. CCOP Technical Bulletin Vol. 2, "UNECAFE", pp.CCOP Technical Bulletin, Emery KO
  50. Foreign Relations of the United States, "Diplomatic Papers : The Conferences of Berlin (The Potsdam Conference)1945, Vol. 2", pp.1471~1476 (1960), US Government Printing Office
  51. Foreign Relations of the United States, "Diplomatic Papers : The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran 1943", pp.324~ (1961), US Government Printing Office
  52. Glahn G, "Law Among Nations", pp.316~ (1986), MacMillan
  53. Hornsby M, "Japan Asserts Rights to Isles Claimed by China", London Times, ~ (1972)
  54. ICJ, "ICJ Reports", pp.56~ (1953)
  55. Inoue K, "The Tiaoyu Islands (Senkaku Island) are China's Territory", Peking Review, 15(19), pp.18~22 (1972)
  56. Jennings RY, "The Aquisition of Territory in International Law", pp.130~ (1961), Manchester University Press
  57. Supreme Court of the United States, "Johnson and Graham's Lessee v. M'Intosh Case 21 US 8 Wheaton 543", ~ (1823)
  58. Linebarger P, "Far Eastern Governments and Politics", pp.630~ (1954), D Van Nostrand Co
  59. Matsui Y, "Legal Bases and Anaysis of Japan's Claims to Diaoyu Islands", International Law Conference on the Dispute over the Diaoyu, 1997, 12~13
  60. "The Basic View on the Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands" (1972)[URL]
  61. Okuhara T, "The Problem of Senkaku Islands and the Article by Inoue", Kiyoshi Asahi Asia Review, 13 (1973)
  62. Okuhara T, "The Process of Incorporation of the Senkaku Islands. Seikeigakkaishi", Kokushikan University 4, ~ (1975)
  63. Ozaki S, "International Legal Status of the Senkaku Islands : Mainly on its Historical Aspects", Tsukuba Hosei 18, ~ (1995)
  64. Prescott C, "The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World", pp.217~218 (2005), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  65. Jennings RY, "The Acquisition of Territory in International Law", pp.130~ (1963), Manchester University Press
  66. PCIJ, "Reports of international arbitral awards, Vol. 2", pp.831~871 (1928)
  67. PCIJ, "The Legal Status of Eastern Greenland Case", ~ (1933)
  68. Rebert M, "Cases and Materials on International Law" (2003), Oxford University Press
  69. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, "Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China", Peking Review, 15(1), pp.12~ (1972)
  70. Clipperton Islands Case, "France. v. Mexico, 1931", Am J Int Law, 26, pp.394~ (1932)
  71. U.S. Government Printing Office, "United States Treaties and Other International Agreements 23(I)", 449~458 (1972)
  72. United States Department of State Historical Office, "American Foreign Policy 1950-1955. Basic Documents 1", Government Printing Office, 453~ (1955)
  73. Mark J. Valencia, "The East China Sea DisputeContext, Claims, Issues, and Possible Solutions", Asian Perspective, 31(1), pp.126~167 (2007), 극동문제연구소
  74. Van Dyke JM, "Disputes Over Islands and Maritime Boundaries in East Asia", pp.39~76 (2009), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  75. Wageman JM, "Structural framework of East China Sea and Yellow Sea", AAPG Bull, 54(9), pp.1611~1643 (1970)
  76. Zhou C, "Oil-gas exploration in the East China Sea and the main achievements", Mar Geol Quaternary Geo, 9, pp.51~61 (1989)
  77. "Declarations Recognizing the Jurisdiction of the Court as Compulsory" (2007)[URL]
  78. "Declarations and statements" (2013)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

중ㆍ일간 조어도의 영유권 분쟁에 대한 고찰김선화한국해사법학회 · 해사법연구2007 · 제19권 제2호Dispute over Diaoyudao (Senkakuretto) and Its Implications for Dokdo ― Conflicts over History, Relevant Names and Boundaries ―이창위서울시립대학교 법학연구소 · 서울법학2019 · 제27권 제3호띠아오위따오/센카쿠렛토 분쟁의 쟁점과 독도에의 함의이창위고려대학교 법학연구원 · 고려법학2011 · 제62호중·일간 센카쿠열도 영유권 분쟁 연구박향기육군군사연구소 · 군사연구2015 · 제139호일본의 도서 분쟁과 관련 지명 및 범위에 대한 갈등 - 국제분쟁의 평화적 해결을 위한 법사학적 접근을 중심으로 -이창위사단법인 법조협회 · 법조2012 · 제61권 제1호독도・센카쿠제도・북방영토에 대한 일본정부의 차별적 영유권 인식최장근한국일본문화학회 · 日本文化學報2014 · 제61호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

새만금 외해역 조하대 퇴적물에 서식하는 중형저서동물 군집에 관한 연구김광수, 박은옥, 이원철, 홍정호, 이승한pp. 209-223Transoceanic Propagation of 2011 East Japan Earthquake TsunamiEfim Pelinovsky, 최병호, 김경옥, 민병일pp. 225-234First Finding of the Mud Shrimp Upogebia yokoyai Makarov, 1938(Crustacea: Decapoda: Upogebiidae) in Korean Waters이채린, 홍재상pp. 235-246극지 홍조류 Polysiphonia stricta에서 분리된 methyl trans-aconitate 유도체들과 항산화 활성서영완, 백승오, 공창숙, 이정임pp. 247-254선택실험법을 이용한 심해 유인잠수정 개발사업의 과학기술적 경제적 편익추정진세준, 유승훈, 박세헌, 임슬예pp. 277-288
원문 보기