컴퓨터 프로그램 보호와 저작권남용 - 미국판례의 전개를 중심으로 -
Computer Program & Copyright Misuse - Focusing on the US Judical Precedents -
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Regarding the protection of computer software industry, legal framework in Korea and US resemble each other very closely. From this point on, US judicial precedents can be referenced without having not much modification for Korean context. Software itself, even though protected by copyright same as poems, songs and lyrics, works slightly different in the process of being innovated and diffused for the benefit of the other members of the society. Both of them are innovated in a cumulative way, but in the case of software, that is Computer Program, the cumulative feature looks more clear. Computer Program, different from the traditional copyright subject matters, bears lock-in effect and network effect which can be used as a tool for market foreclosure preventing any entrants coming into the marketplace. Due to this reason, copyright misuse doctrine in dealing with the computer program has to be caliberated with the cases connected with the traditional copyright subject matters. Thinking of the first US appellate court's case adopting copyright misuse doctrine, Lasercomb case, was actually computer program related one which is not a unexpected and curious happening. In Korea, re computer program more vigilant monitoring has to be made remembering the nature of computer program. In applying copyright misuse doctrine to computer program related cases, antitrust rules and judicial precedents will be utilized for regulating them.
Abstract
Regarding the protection of computer software industry, legal framework in Korea and US resemble each other very closely. From this point on, US judicial precedents can be referenced without having not much modification for Korean context. Software itself, even though protected by copyright same as poems, songs and lyrics, works slightly different in the process of being innovated and diffused for the benefit of the other members of the society. Both of them are innovated in a cumulative way, but in the case of software, that is Computer Program, the cumulative feature looks more clear. Computer Program, different from the traditional copyright subject matters, bears lock-in effect and network effect which can be used as a tool for market foreclosure preventing any entrants coming into the marketplace. Due to this reason, copyright misuse doctrine in dealing with the computer program has to be caliberated with the cases connected with the traditional copyright subject matters. Thinking of the first US appellate court's case adopting copyright misuse doctrine, Lasercomb case, was actually computer program related one which is not a unexpected and curious happening. In Korea, re computer program more vigilant monitoring has to be made remembering the nature of computer program. In applying copyright misuse doctrine to computer program related cases, antitrust rules and judicial precedents will be utilized for regulating them.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권오승, "경제법 제8판" (2010), 법문사
- 권오승, "공정거래법 강의Ⅱ" (2000), 법문사
- 이규호, "저작권법-사례 해설-" (2010), 진원사
- 김일중, "프로그램 저작권보호와 경쟁정책", 산업조직연구, 7(2) (1999)
- 오승한, "특허ㆍ저작권자의 시장선점 행위에 대한 독점규제법상 규제", 산업재산권, (29), pp.288~340 (2009), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 박준우, "저작권 남용에 관한 미국 연방항소법원의 ‘Lasercomb 사건’의 의미와 한계", 지식재산연구, 5(2), pp.111~129 (2010), 한국지식재산연구원
- Arthur W. Brian, "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events", The Economic Journal, 99(394) (1989)
- Brett Frischmann, "The Evolving Common Law Doctrine of Copyright Misuse: A Unified Theory and Its Application to Software", Berk. Tech. L.J, 15, pp.865~ (2000)
- David, PA, "New technology diffusion, public policy and industrial competitiveness", paper presented at the Symposium on Economics and Technology (1985)
- DENNIS S. KARJALA, "Distinguishing Patent and Copyright Subject Matter", Conn. L. Rev, 35, pp.439~ (2003)
- Glynn S. Lunney Jr., "Copyright and Computer Programs", Tul. L. Rev, 70, pp.2397~ (1996)
- Mark A. Lemley, "Encouraging Software Reuse", Stanford Law Review, 255, pp.264~268 (1997)
- Peter S. Menell, "An Epitaph for Traditional Copyright Protection of Network Features of Computer Software", Antitrust Bull, 43, pp.651~ (1998)
- Peter S. Menell, "Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software", Stanford Law Review, 39(6) (1987)
- Philip Abromats, "Comment: Copyright Misuse and Anticompetitive Software Licensing Restrictions: Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Reynolds", U. Pitt. L. Rev, 52, pp.629~ (1991)
- Robert P. Merges, "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope", COLUM. L. REV, 90, pp.839~ (1990)
- Scott Abrahamson, "Seen One, Seen Them All? Making Sense of the Copyright Merger Doctrine", UCLA L. Rev, 45, pp.1125~ (1998)
- Baker v. Selden, "101 U.S. 99 (1879)", ~ (1879)
- Computer Assoc. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., "982 F.2d 693 (2d Cir.1992)", ~
- Lotus Development Corp. v. Paperback Software Intern., "740 F.Supp. 37 (1990)", ~ (1990)
- Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International., Inc., "799 F.Supp. 203 (1992)", ~ (1992)
- Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., "49 F.3d 807 (1995)", ~ (1995)
- Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc., "516 U.S. 233 (1996)", ~ (1996)
- Williams Elec., Inc., v. Artic Int'l, Inc., "685 F.2d 870 (1982)", ~ (1982)
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., "714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983)", ~ (1983)
- Data General Corp. v. Digidyne Corp., "734 F.2d 1336 (9th Cir. 1984)", ~ (1984)
- NEC Corp. v. Intel Corp., "645 F.Supp. 590 (N.D. Cal. 1986)", ~ (1986)
- Whelan Associates Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory Inc., "797 F.2d 1222 (1986)", ~ (1986)
- Red Baron-Franklin Park v. Taito Corp., "883 F.2d 275 (4th Cir. 1989)", ~ (1989)
- Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America Inc., "975 F.2d 832 (Fed. Cir. 1992)", ~ (1992)
- Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade Inc., "977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992)", ~ (1992)