본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외주제작 방송프로그램의 저작권 귀속에 관한 연구

A Study on Copyright Ownership of Outsourcing Broadcast Program

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine a little further the ideal copyright ownership of outsourcing broadcast program, including the issue of equity and transparency in the copyright contract between broadcasting organizations and production companies. Korean Copyright Act(hereinafter, 'Act'), in Article 2 (xiii), defines cinematographic works as "creative works, with or without sound, consisting of sequences of moving images which are intended to be shown by the use of machines or electronic equipment, in which the works are embodied". The essential characteristic of all the material objects, such as films or TV broadcast programs(ex TV dramas), falling within the cinematographic works is the existence of 'a sequence of moving images'. Unlike other works, fixation is expressly required for cinematographic works as defined by Article 2 (xiii). A cinematographic work is a collaborative medium with many creative people contributing to the final products. The question of ownership of rights in cinematographic works has long posed problems in the national and international regulation of rights in this area. In order to cover the question of ownership of the copyright in the resulting cinematographic works, the Act have introduced a legal presumption in favor of the maker of cinematographic works, in Article 99~101. The Act also stipulates that a legal entity is an employer who is deemed to be the author of a work made by his employee in the course of performing his duties, in Article 9. Then, the development of film industry in Korea poses a question as to the authorship of a cinematographic work produced in the course of performing their duty by modern authors(ex, director, etc.) of a film production company. The position as regards authorship of a cinematographic work is somewhat more complicated, this complexity proceeds from ambiguities between Article 9 and Article 100 (1). According to Article 2 (ii), since film-making requires the co-operation of many persons, there may be either a joint copyright in a cinematographic work for all of the co-authors or a separate copyright in it for each of the principal collaborators in his own creative contribution. Article 100 (1) stipulates that the right of commercial exploitation of a cinematographic work can only be assigned to maker of cinematographic works by presumption of law. The legal issues and business practices which this paper deals with are as follows : Firstly, I addressed definition, types and features of outsourcing broadcast programs, and dealt with the basic aspects of copyright issues involving the concept of cinematographic work, the requirement for some particular kind of fixation for cinematographic work. Secondly, I reviewed the analysis of the structure of cinematographic works manufacturing process, especially relating to the definition and meaning of product placement. Thirdly, I reviewed the intial ownership of cinematographic works in relation to Article 100 (1), 2 (ii), or Article 9. Finally, based on the review stated above, I addressed briefly the areas of the laws on broadcast copyright which need to be improved.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine a little further the ideal copyright ownership of outsourcing broadcast program, including the issue of equity and transparency in the copyright contract between broadcasting organizations and production companies. Korean Copyright Act(hereinafter, 'Act'), in Article 2 (xiii), defines cinematographic works as "creative works, with or without sound, consisting of sequences of moving images which are intended to be shown by the use of machines or electronic equipment, in which the works are embodied". The essential characteristic of all the material objects, such as films or TV broadcast programs(ex TV dramas), falling within the cinematographic works is the existence of 'a sequence of moving images'. Unlike other works, fixation is expressly required for cinematographic works as defined by Article 2 (xiii). A cinematographic work is a collaborative medium with many creative people contributing to the final products. The question of ownership of rights in cinematographic works has long posed problems in the national and international regulation of rights in this area. In order to cover the question of ownership of the copyright in the resulting cinematographic works, the Act have introduced a legal presumption in favor of the maker of cinematographic works, in Article 99~101. The Act also stipulates that a legal entity is an employer who is deemed to be the author of a work made by his employee in the course of performing his duties, in Article 9. Then, the development of film industry in Korea poses a question as to the authorship of a cinematographic work produced in the course of performing their duty by modern authors(ex, director, etc.) of a film production company. The position as regards authorship of a cinematographic work is somewhat more complicated, this complexity proceeds from ambiguities between Article 9 and Article 100 (1). According to Article 2 (ii), since film-making requires the co-operation of many persons, there may be either a joint copyright in a cinematographic work for all of the co-authors or a separate copyright in it for each of the principal collaborators in his own creative contribution. Article 100 (1) stipulates that the right of commercial exploitation of a cinematographic work can only be assigned to maker of cinematographic works by presumption of law. The legal issues and business practices which this paper deals with are as follows : Firstly, I addressed definition, types and features of outsourcing broadcast programs, and dealt with the basic aspects of copyright issues involving the concept of cinematographic work, the requirement for some particular kind of fixation for cinematographic work. Secondly, I reviewed the analysis of the structure of cinematographic works manufacturing process, especially relating to the definition and meaning of product placement. Thirdly, I reviewed the intial ownership of cinematographic works in relation to Article 100 (1), 2 (ii), or Article 9. Finally, based on the review stated above, I addressed briefly the areas of the laws on broadcast copyright which need to be improved.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강현두, "현대 대중문화의 형성" (1998), 서울대출판부
  2. 김우룡, "방송과 독립프로덕션" (1992), 나남
  3. 나낙균, "방송영상 저작권" (2010), 인제대출판부
  4. 박성호, "문화산업법" (2012), 한양대학교출판부
  5. 박성호, "저작권법" (2014), 박영사
  6. 방석호, "디지털시대의 미디어와 저작권" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
  7. 서달주, "한국저작권법" (2007), 박문각
  8. 이재희, "예술과 경제" (1998), 경성대출판부
  9. 이해완, "저작권법" (2007), 박영사
  10. 장인숙, "저작권법원론" (1996), 보진재
  11. 정상조, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
  12. 정상조, "Entertainment Law" (2007), 박영사
  13. 정윤경, "저작권과 방송콘텐츠 유통" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
  14. TV제작산업 분석과 독립제작사 육성방안, "최양수", 한국방송개발원, ~ (1994)
  15. 한승헌, "정보화시대의 저작권" (1992), 나남
  16. 허희성, "2007 신저작권법 축조개설 하" (2007), 명문프리컴
  17. 황적인, "저작권법" (1988), 법문사
  18. 황적인, "저작물과 출판권" (1990), 한국문예학술저작권협회
  19. Daniel Royot, "할리우드" (2000), 한길사
  20. J.A.L. Sterling, "World Copyright Law" (2003), Sweet&Maxwell
  21. 金井重彦, "エンターテインメント法" (2011), 學陽書房
  22. 內藤篤, "エンタテインメント契約法" (2004), 商事法務
  23. 道垣內正人, "エンタテインメント法への招待" (2011), ミネルヴァ書房
  24. 淸水幸雄, "著作權實務百科" (1992), 學陽書房
  25. 김경제, "TV 방송프로그램의 저작권", 법학연구, 38(1) (1997), 부산대
  26. 김병희, "간접광고, 약(藥)으로 쓰는 해독(解毒)처치법", 방송작가 (2011), 한국방송작가협회
  27. 방석호, "영상저작물과 방송", 계간 저작권, (겨울) (2004), 저작권심의조정위원회
  28. 홍승기, "독립제작사의 저작권", 법률신문, ~ (2004)
  29. 竹內冬郞, "放送番組の流通著作權をめぐる疑問を解く", 放送硏究と調査 (2005)
  30. 권경성, "드라마 외주사, ‘저작권 없는 하청 신세’", 미디어오늘, ~ (2008)
  31. 백승권, "독립을 세일합니다―독립프로덕션 정체성 위기", 미디어오늘, ~ (1997)
  32. 유재혁, "지상파 간접광고 독식 논란", 한국경제, ~ (2010)
  33. 최성민, "역할커진 방송프로덕션 미국압력으로 위축우려―방송사와 불리한 계약관계도 한몫", 한겨레신문, ~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)