중국에서의 상표권과 상호권의 권리충돌에 관한 연구 – 상표법과 부정경쟁방지법상의 권리보호를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Conflicts of Rights between trademarks and trade names in China - Focusing on the Protection of Rights under Trade Law and Unfair Competition Prevention Law
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently the cases of Korean company’s trademarks and trade names stolen are increasing due to the influence of the Korean wave. Therefore, for Korean companies, drawing up guidelines on a collision of trademarks and trade names is urgently needed in china. However, earlier domestic studies have been focusing on major provisions of china Trademark law; the study on a collision of trademarks and trade names is insufficient. On a collision of trademarks and trade names in china, we have examined both theories and practices through analysis of cases and related regulation research. Service mark of the Trademark law was misidentified by having similarities with company’s trademarks and trade names. Those are each different rights of protection object, protection law, the scope of effectiveness and component parts. So then, the collision of trademarks and trade names is occasionally happening. In addition, the collision of trademarks and trade names makes consumers not to differentiate the origin of service. Trademark law and prevention of Unfair Competition Prevention Law would regulate not to make a loss for party’s interests and for the public interests. Trademark law and prevention of Unfair Competition Prevention Law in China have been not only protecting a trademark and a trade name as one of civil rights, but also having clear regulations of how to judge rights violation in case of the collision of both rights. In the past, a Chinese court had taken a negative attitude on the collision of a trademark and a trade name, but through several times revision of Trademark law we can acknowledge the changing its attitude to be more positive by a judicial precedent.
Abstract
Recently the cases of Korean company’s trademarks and trade names stolen are increasing due to the influence of the Korean wave. Therefore, for Korean companies, drawing up guidelines on a collision of trademarks and trade names is urgently needed in china. However, earlier domestic studies have been focusing on major provisions of china Trademark law; the study on a collision of trademarks and trade names is insufficient. On a collision of trademarks and trade names in china, we have examined both theories and practices through analysis of cases and related regulation research. Service mark of the Trademark law was misidentified by having similarities with company’s trademarks and trade names. Those are each different rights of protection object, protection law, the scope of effectiveness and component parts. So then, the collision of trademarks and trade names is occasionally happening. In addition, the collision of trademarks and trade names makes consumers not to differentiate the origin of service. Trademark law and prevention of Unfair Competition Prevention Law would regulate not to make a loss for party’s interests and for the public interests. Trademark law and prevention of Unfair Competition Prevention Law in China have been not only protecting a trademark and a trade name as one of civil rights, but also having clear regulations of how to judge rights violation in case of the collision of both rights. In the past, a Chinese court had taken a negative attitude on the collision of a trademark and a trade name, but through several times revision of Trademark law we can acknowledge the changing its attitude to be more positive by a judicial precedent.
참고문헌 (26)
- 孔祥俊, "商标法适用的基本问题" (2014), 中国法制出版社
- 刘春田, "知识产权法" (2009), 中国人民大学出版社
- 徐孟洲, "竞争法" (2014), 中国人民大学出版社
- 王连峰, "商标法学" (2014), 北京大学出版社
- 王先林, "竞争法学" (2013), 中国人民大学出版社
- 周云川, "商标授权确权诉讼规则与判例" (2014), 法律出版社
- 김현경, "상법상 상호권 보호의 재조명", 안암법학, (37), pp.689~718 (2012), 안암법학회
- 박홍진, "영업상의 표지로서 상호와 상표에 관한 소고", 원광법학, 22(2), pp.381~400 (2006), 법학연구소
- 서계원, "중국법에서 상표권과 상호권의 충돌 및 해결방법", 지식재산연구, 4(1) (2009)
- 정태호, "중국에서의 지식재산권의 권리충돌문제의 본질적인 해석에 관한 고찰", 정보법학, 16(1), pp.197~236 (2012), 한국정보법학회[DOI]
- 顾建亚, "特别法优于一般法规则适用难题探析", 学术论坛, (12) (2007)
- "商标与商号的权利冲突问题研究"[URL]
- 李永明, "商标权与商号权的权利冲突及解决途径", 法学家, (4) (2002)
- 杨玉熹, "商号与商标:权利冲突与解决", 现代法学, (4) (1999)
- 王太平, "论商标注册申请及其拒绝—兼评“微信”商标纠纷案", 知识产权, (4) (2015)
- 钱玉文, "论商标法与反不正当竞争法的适用选择", 知识产权, (9) (2015)
- 郑友德, "论商标法和反不正当竞争法对商标权益的平行保护", 法商研究, (5) (2009)
- 周详, "知识产权权利冲突若千问题研究", 电子知识产权 (2004)
- 祝建军, "后注册商标与在先商号的权利冲突与解决—以“正凌”商标与商号的权利冲突纠纷案为例", 电子知识产权 (2009)
- "江苏省高级人民法院(2009)苏民三终字第0168号民事判决书", ~ (2009)
- "江苏省南通市中级人民法院(2008)通中知民初字第0122号民事判决", ~ (2008)
- "北京市高级人民法院(1998)高知终字第71号民事判决书", ~ (1998)
- "北京市第二终极人民法院(1997)二中初字第43号民事判决书", ~ (1997)
- "北京市第一中级人民法院(2010)一中知行初字第1466号民事判决书", ~ (2010)
- "山东省高级人民法院(2014)鲁民三终字第43号民事判决书", ~ (2014)
- "上海市高级人民法院(2006)滤高民叁(知)终字第32号民事判决书", ~ (2006)
