특허 강제실시제도에 관한 연구
A Legal study of Patent Compulsory License
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Historical Origins of Patent Compulsory Licensing and Its Implications In the 21st century, Patent compulsory licensing system has become important with the increase of interest in the patent abuse and public health. The position of the developed and developing countries surrounding the patent compulsory licensing issues has been in conflict sharply. Historical origins of the patent compulsory licensing helps us to diagnose the validity of the argument that is currently going on.1784 patent and copyright laws of South Carolina is known as the world's first the legislative practices of patent compulsory licensing system. US Senate proposed introduction of patent compulsory licensing scheme in 1790. The United States has played a leading role in the introduction of this system in the 18th century. In 1873, the Vienna patent congress decided introduction of patent compulsory licensing, actively supported by the German delegation. This decision had a significant impact on the national legislation in the world. Argentina introduced the patent compulsory licensing for improvement invention in 1864 and Luxembourg did in 1880 for non-working. The historical origins of the patent compulsory licensing system for non-working, improvement invention and government use, at the national level can be seen as a 1883 United Kingdom patent Act.Meanwhile, survey of System of Patent Compulsory Licensing by countries Historical fact tells us that today's developed countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany had a leading role in the birth of the patent compulsory licensing system for the economic development of their countries. Also, compulsory licensing gave a positive effect on survival of patent system as an alternative for assertion of abolition of patent. Technology advanced countries, especially the United States has opposed patent compulsory licensing system in the international negotiations. They argue that the system lowers the incentive for R&D and eventually has the negative impact on the development of industry. It's time for developed countries to remember the logic supporting the patent compulsory licensing system in the past and pay attention to the claims of the developing world.
Abstract
The Historical Origins of Patent Compulsory Licensing and Its Implications In the 21st century, Patent compulsory licensing system has become important with the increase of interest in the patent abuse and public health. The position of the developed and developing countries surrounding the patent compulsory licensing issues has been in conflict sharply. Historical origins of the patent compulsory licensing helps us to diagnose the validity of the argument that is currently going on.1784 patent and copyright laws of South Carolina is known as the world's first the legislative practices of patent compulsory licensing system. US Senate proposed introduction of patent compulsory licensing scheme in 1790. The United States has played a leading role in the introduction of this system in the 18th century. In 1873, the Vienna patent congress decided introduction of patent compulsory licensing, actively supported by the German delegation. This decision had a significant impact on the national legislation in the world. Argentina introduced the patent compulsory licensing for improvement invention in 1864 and Luxembourg did in 1880 for non-working. The historical origins of the patent compulsory licensing system for non-working, improvement invention and government use, at the national level can be seen as a 1883 United Kingdom patent Act.Meanwhile, survey of System of Patent Compulsory Licensing by countries Historical fact tells us that today's developed countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany had a leading role in the birth of the patent compulsory licensing system for the economic development of their countries. Also, compulsory licensing gave a positive effect on survival of patent system as an alternative for assertion of abolition of patent. Technology advanced countries, especially the United States has opposed patent compulsory licensing system in the international negotiations. They argue that the system lowers the incentive for R&D and eventually has the negative impact on the development of industry. It's time for developed countries to remember the logic supporting the patent compulsory licensing system in the past and pay attention to the claims of the developing world.
참고문헌 (43)
- 송영식, "지적재산권법" (1994), 육법사
- 윤선희, "특허법" (2004), 법문사
- 특허청, "조문별 특허법해설", ~ (2002)
- 특허청, "특허법·실용신안법 조문별 연혁집", ~ (2002)
- 강제실시권 제도 변화에 따른 정부의 실질적 대응방안, "윤권순", 한국발명진흥회 지식재산권연구센터, ~ (2005)
- 김원준, "의약품 특허의 강제실시권 비교법적 고찰", 법학연구, 43, pp.733~767 (2014), 부설법학연구소
- 남희섭, "공공의 이익을 위한 특허발명의 강제실시", 창작과 권리, (봄) (2003), 세창출판사
- 남희섭, "특허권과 인권,그 단절과 연결의 고리를 찾아서", 지식과 권리, (창간) (2003), 대한변리사회
- 박성호, "지적재산권과 인권, 과학기술과인권" (2001), 당대
- 지식재산분야의 경쟁법적 쟁점과 과제, "심미랑", 한국지식재산연구원, ~ (2015)
- 육소영, "특허법상 강제실시권의 연구", 법학연구, 16(1), pp.117~140 (2005), 법학연구소
- 윤권순, "‘특허강제실시’는 미국헌법에 반하는가?", 미국헌법연구, 26(1), pp.263~296 (2015), 미국헌법학회
- 윤권순, "미국 ‘특허강제실시’ 제도의 진화와 그 함의", 지식재산연구, 10(1), pp.1~29 (2015), 한국지식재산연구원
- 이윤주, "특허권과 개발도상국에서의 의약품에 대한 접근과의 조화를 위한 모색", 산업재산권, (24), pp.189~234 (2007), 한국지식재산학회
- 임호, "의약품 특허와 강제실시제도의 국제 규범적 체계", 지식재산연구, 1(2) (2006)
- 정상조, "특허발명의 강제실시", 서울대법학, (110) (1999), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 홍혜종, "의약품 특허의 강제실시권 설정에 관한 고찰 : 글리벡 사건을 중심으로", 석사, 산업재산권법, pp.2003
- 정민수, "의약품 접근권과 특허권의 충돌 문제에서 나타나는 건강권의 비용과 법적 고찰", 한국의료법학회지, 23(1), pp.69~91 (2015), 한국의료법학회[DOI]
- 정연덕, "신기술분야에서의 강제실시제도의 적용에 관한 연구", ~ (2009)
- 정연덕, "의약품 특허 강제실시의 법적 문제", 외법논집, 33(4), pp.271~298 (2009), 법학연구소
- 정차호, "신종플루 등 대유행 전염병에 대비하기 위한 강제실시 제도의 개선방안", 법학논총, 29(2), pp.7~46 (2009), 법학연구소
- 주요국 IP 이슈 및 판례정보 분석보고서, "특허청", 한국지식재산보호협회, ~ (2010)
- 기술의 발전에 따른 특허제도의 변화 - 생명공학·의료·의약 발명관련 판례를 중심으로, "최재식", 지식재산연구원, ~ (2015)
- 小原喜雄, "개괄적 보고 - 파리조약 5조A 개정교섭의 난점은 TRIPs협정에 의해 어느 정도 해결되었는가", 일본공업소유권법학회 연보, (24) (2000)
- 土肥一史, "강제실시허락제도와 공공의 복지", 일본공업소유권법학연보, (24) (2000)
- Carol M. Nielsen, "COMPULSORY PATENTLICENSING: IS IT A VIABLE SOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES?", Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 13 (2007)
- Fritz Machlup, "An Economic Review of Patent System" (1958), UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
- Recent examples of the use of compulsory licenses on patents, "James Packard Love", Knowledge Ecology International, ~, pp.KEI Research Notes 2 (2007)
- John D. Pinzone, "The Affordable Prescription Drugs Act: A Solution for Today’s High Prescription Drug Prices", Journal of Law and Health, 16 (2001)
- Frank D. Prager, "Historic Background and Foundations of American Patent Law", The American Journal of Legal History, 5 (1961)
- Machlup, "The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century", The Journal of Economic History, 10(1) (1950)
- Kristopher Lancial, "Compulsory Patent Licensing: The Next Step in Adapting Patents to the Technological Age", Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, 18 (2013)
- Neil S. Tyler, "Patent Non use and Technology Suppression: The Use of Compulsory Licensing to Promote Progress", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 162 (2014)
- Oliver Brand, "The dawn of compulsory patent licensing", Intellectual Property Quarterly, (2) (2007)
- William G. Pagan, "Compulsory Licensing of Gene Patents in the Public Interest", Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Law Review, 93 (2014)
- Oren Bracha, "The Adventures of the Statute of Anne in the Land of Unlimited Possibilities: the Life of a Legal Transplant", Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25 (2010)