의료정보의 공유가능성에 대한 법적 검토 - 미국, 프랑스, 유럽연합을 중심으로 -
The Legal Analysis of Sharing Health Information
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Medical service is one of critical elements for human life. Many people in Korea still seek most health related information(a.k.a. health information. Health information may be the inclusive concept of medical information) on the internet. It is not clear whether the health information on the internet is provided by doctors or other medical personnel and whether such information is correct. With the sharing system, the society is more prosperous and economic inequality can be relieved. However, due to the some economic aspect of the sharing system, people are reluctant to use the sharing system for health information. Moreover, health information raises serious issues surrounding privacy protection. Accordingly, people hesitate to share health information or healthcare data even for the non-profit purpose. This article reviews whether sharing health information is feasible for the non-profit purpose and whether it is possible to use the sharing system for health information based on U.S., French and E.U. laws. In the United States, the Federal Health Insurance Information Transfer and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) are responsible for the protection of health information. HIPAA focuses on medical fraud, administrative simplification, and computerization of health information, and recognizes the need to maintain strict privacy protection for health information. In France, the Public Health Act imposes the duty to protect personal information on medical service providers, and the Data Act applies to the sharing of health information for research purposes. Personal data protection in the European Union is governed by the GDPR, which in principle prohibits processing personal health data, but exceptions are recognized. In accordance with the GDPR, the processing of personal information must satisfy the requirements of legality, fairness, transparency, data minimization, accuracy, the limitation of the storage period, integrity and confidentiality. HIPAA does not prohibit the cross-border transfer of protected health information if the requirements of HIPAA are met. However, because of the reporting obligation to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, it is common to include contractual restrictions or prohibitions on cross-border transfer in the U.S. In France, as a member of the EU, the EU's GDPR applies directly, and as a national law, Law No. 78-17 (French Data Protection Law) applies. In the European Union, cross-border transfer of private data is regulated in dividing into transfers to EU member states and transfers to non-EU countries. For transfers within the European Union, the GDPR imposes no additional requirements beyond the direct application of the GDPR. For transfers to non-EU countries, in addition to the compliance of GDPR, decision on the appropriateness by the Commission is required. If not, the contract must provide an additional guarantee.
Abstract
Medical service is one of critical elements for human life. Many people in Korea still seek most health related information(a.k.a. health information. Health information may be the inclusive concept of medical information) on the internet. It is not clear whether the health information on the internet is provided by doctors or other medical personnel and whether such information is correct. With the sharing system, the society is more prosperous and economic inequality can be relieved. However, due to the some economic aspect of the sharing system, people are reluctant to use the sharing system for health information. Moreover, health information raises serious issues surrounding privacy protection. Accordingly, people hesitate to share health information or healthcare data even for the non-profit purpose. This article reviews whether sharing health information is feasible for the non-profit purpose and whether it is possible to use the sharing system for health information based on U.S., French and E.U. laws. In the United States, the Federal Health Insurance Information Transfer and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) are responsible for the protection of health information. HIPAA focuses on medical fraud, administrative simplification, and computerization of health information, and recognizes the need to maintain strict privacy protection for health information. In France, the Public Health Act imposes the duty to protect personal information on medical service providers, and the Data Act applies to the sharing of health information for research purposes. Personal data protection in the European Union is governed by the GDPR, which in principle prohibits processing personal health data, but exceptions are recognized. In accordance with the GDPR, the processing of personal information must satisfy the requirements of legality, fairness, transparency, data minimization, accuracy, the limitation of the storage period, integrity and confidentiality. HIPAA does not prohibit the cross-border transfer of protected health information if the requirements of HIPAA are met. However, because of the reporting obligation to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, it is common to include contractual restrictions or prohibitions on cross-border transfer in the U.S. In France, as a member of the EU, the EU's GDPR applies directly, and as a national law, Law No. 78-17 (French Data Protection Law) applies. In the European Union, cross-border transfer of private data is regulated in dividing into transfers to EU member states and transfers to non-EU countries. For transfers within the European Union, the GDPR imposes no additional requirements beyond the direct application of the GDPR. For transfers to non-EU countries, in addition to the compliance of GDPR, decision on the appropriateness by the Commission is required. If not, the contract must provide an additional guarantee.
참고문헌 (16)
- 공재현, "공유경제의 개념과 동향", ie 매거진, 26(2)통권 : 84 (2019), 대한산업공학회
- 김진경, "의료정보 이용 및 공개에 관한 법적기준 -미국 프라이버시 규칙과 피험자보호 규칙의 검토-", 한양법학, (28), pp.209~222 (2009), 한양법학회
- 국제사회의 공유경제 추진현황과 시사점, "나승권", 대외경제정책연구원, ~, pp.연구자료 17-10 (2017)
- 박경태, "연구대상자 개인정보보호에 관한 고찰: 미국 의료정보보호법과 우리나라 개인정보보호법을 중심으로", 한국의료법학회지, 22(2), pp.167~184 (2014), 한국의료법학회[DOI]
- 이재민, "제4섹터 공유경제의 개념화와 정책적 활용", 지역사회연구, 27(3), pp.42~68 (2019), 한국지역사회학회[DOI]
- OECD, "OECD Health Statistics 2020, Ch. III", 10~ (2020)
- 정규원, "의료정보의 활용 및 보호", 정보법학, 6(1) (2002)
- 최계영, "의료 분야에서의 개인정보보호 - 유럽연합과 미국의 법제를 중심으로 -", 경제규제와 법, 9(2), pp.206~223 (2016), 법학연구소
- 홍완식, "유럽연합의 입법에 관한 연구", 법제논단 (2004)
- Dara Hallinan, "International transfers of personal data for health research following Schrems II : a problem in need of a solution", E. U. J. of Human Genetics, 29, pp.1502~ (2021)
- Deborah F. Buckman, "Validity, Construction, and Application of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and Regulations Promulgated Thereunder", ALR Fed, 194, pp.133~ (2004)
- Laura Bradford, "International transfers of health data between the EU and USA: a sector-specific approach for the USA to ensure an ‘adequate’ level of protection", J. of L. & the Biosciences, 1(33), pp.6~ (2020)[DOI]
- Robin Miller, "Constitutionality of State Laws Regulating Use or Sale of Physician-Identifying Prescription Information for Commercial Purposes", A.L.R. 6th, 67, pp.629~ (2011)
- Roger E. Harris, "The Need to Know Versus the Right to Know : Privacy of Patent Medical Data in an Information-Based Society", Suffolk U. L. Rev, 30, pp.1183~ (1997)
- "How the Sharing Economy Screws American Workers" (2016)[URL]
- Susan Prince, "FLSA Employee Exemption Handbook" (2006)
