본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Protecting and Utilizing Health and Medical Big Data: Policy Perspectives from Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

We analyzed Korea’s data privacy regime in the context of protecting and utilizing health and medical big data and tried to draw policy implications from the analyses. Methods: We conducted comparative analyses of the legal and regulatory environments governing health and medical big data with a view to drawing policy implications for Korea. The legal and regulatory regimes considered include the following: the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, the United States, and Japan. We reviewed relevant statutory materials as well as various non-statutory materials and guidelines issued by public authorities. Where available, we also examined policy measures implemented by government agencies. Results: In this study, we investigated how various jurisdictions deal with legal and regulatory issues that may arise from the use of health and medical information with regard to the protection of data subjects’ rights and the protection of personal information. We compared and analyzed various forms of legislation in various jurisdictions and also considered technical methods, such as de-identification. The main findings include the following: there is a need to streamline the relationship between the general data privacy regime and the regulatory regime governing health and medical big data; the regulatory and institutional structure for data governance should be more clearly delineated; and regulation should encourage the development of suitable methodologies for the de-identification of data and, in doing so, a principle-based and risk-based approach should be taken. Conclusions: Following our comparative legal analyses, implications were drawn. The main conclusion is that the relationship between the legal requirements imposed for purposes of personal information protection and the regulatory requirements governing the use of health and medical data is complicated and multi-faceted and, as such, their relationship should be more clearly streamlined and delineated.

Abstract

We analyzed Korea’s data privacy regime in the context of protecting and utilizing health and medical big data and tried to draw policy implications from the analyses. Methods: We conducted comparative analyses of the legal and regulatory environments governing health and medical big data with a view to drawing policy implications for Korea. The legal and regulatory regimes considered include the following: the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, the United States, and Japan. We reviewed relevant statutory materials as well as various non-statutory materials and guidelines issued by public authorities. Where available, we also examined policy measures implemented by government agencies. Results: In this study, we investigated how various jurisdictions deal with legal and regulatory issues that may arise from the use of health and medical information with regard to the protection of data subjects’ rights and the protection of personal information. We compared and analyzed various forms of legislation in various jurisdictions and also considered technical methods, such as de-identification. The main findings include the following: there is a need to streamline the relationship between the general data privacy regime and the regulatory regime governing health and medical big data; the regulatory and institutional structure for data governance should be more clearly delineated; and regulation should encourage the development of suitable methodologies for the de-identification of data and, in doing so, a principle-based and risk-based approach should be taken. Conclusions: Following our comparative legal analyses, implications were drawn. The main conclusion is that the relationship between the legal requirements imposed for purposes of personal information protection and the regulatory requirements governing the use of health and medical data is complicated and multi-faceted and, as such, their relationship should be more clearly streamlined and delineated.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Raghupathi W, "Big data analytics in healthcare : promise and potential", Health Inf Sci Syst, 2, pp.3~ (2014)
  2. "Framework Act on Health and Medical Services" (2008)[URL]
  3. "Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: recommendations for businesses and policymakers" (2012)[URL]
  4. "OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (Paragraph 3:Different degrees of sensitivity)" (2019)[URL]
  5. "Recommendation CM/Rec(2019)2of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of health-related data" (2019)[URL]
  6. "Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information" (2003)[URL]
  7. "Caldicott review: information governance in the health and care system" (2013)[URL]
  8. "Consent form" (2006)[URL]
  9. "Genomics England" (2019)[URL]
  10. "Law No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 relating to data, files and freedoms" (1978)[URL]
  11. "The HIPAA Privacy Rule" (2019)[URL]
  12. Hoffman S., "Electronic health records and medical big data: law and policy" (2016), Cambridge University Press
  13. "Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No. 57 of 2003)" (2003)[URL]
  14. "Guidelines for genetic tests and diagnoses in medical practice" (2011)[URL]
  15. "What is Horizon 2020?" (2019)[URL]
  16. "The AEGLE Project" (2019)[URL]
  17. "Making NHS data work for everyone" (2018)[URL]
  18. "Data sets" (2019)[URL]
  19. "About the Portal Epidemiology – France" (2019)[URL]
  20. "Un nouveau guide de la sécurité des données personnelles" (2018)[URL]
  21. "Open Government Plan" (2016)[URL]
  22. "Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)Privacy Rule" (2012)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)