본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부정경쟁방지법상 데이터 부정사용행위의 법적 쟁점

Legal Issues of Illegal Use of Data under the Korean Unfair Competition Prevention Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

It has been over two years since the introduction and implementation of clause (k) in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as UCPA). The year 2022, marking the enforcement of Clause (k), witnessed a heightened interest in data, leading to a surge in related legislative activities. Recognizing that protecting data through exclusive property rights could impede its smooth and fair distribution, the UCPA introduced Clause (k) as a behavioral regulation form of unfair competition, rather than creating a new right. This clause specifically governs data that is limited in its provision. Prior to the introduction of Clause (k), various laws such as the trade secret protection provisions under the UCPA, the database producer protection provisions under the Copyright Act, and the content protection provisions under the Content Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter referred to as the Content Industry Act) aimed to balance the protection and utilization of data. Therefore, the necessity and effectiveness of Clause (k) were subjects of considerable debate. However, societal changes highlighted the need for protection of data that serves as a transaction object rather than as trade secrets. Furthermore, the regulation of unstructured data or data not systematically arranged, which is difficult to protect under existing legal frameworks, necessitated the inclusion of Clause (k) in its present form. The introduction of Clause (k) in the UCPA has thus opened a new avenue for regulating the misappropriation of data under intellectual property law. Nonetheless, numerous debates regarding the legislative necessity, the scope, and the applicability of this provision emerged during its inception. The complex factual requirements have led to interpretative challenges and disagreements. Given that more than two years have elapsed since its implementation, it is imperative to review these requirements and legal issues and to consider potential improvements if necessary. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Clause (k) and sequentially examine the major legal issues based on this foundation.

Abstract

It has been over two years since the introduction and implementation of clause (k) in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as UCPA). The year 2022, marking the enforcement of Clause (k), witnessed a heightened interest in data, leading to a surge in related legislative activities. Recognizing that protecting data through exclusive property rights could impede its smooth and fair distribution, the UCPA introduced Clause (k) as a behavioral regulation form of unfair competition, rather than creating a new right. This clause specifically governs data that is limited in its provision. Prior to the introduction of Clause (k), various laws such as the trade secret protection provisions under the UCPA, the database producer protection provisions under the Copyright Act, and the content protection provisions under the Content Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter referred to as the Content Industry Act) aimed to balance the protection and utilization of data. Therefore, the necessity and effectiveness of Clause (k) were subjects of considerable debate. However, societal changes highlighted the need for protection of data that serves as a transaction object rather than as trade secrets. Furthermore, the regulation of unstructured data or data not systematically arranged, which is difficult to protect under existing legal frameworks, necessitated the inclusion of Clause (k) in its present form. The introduction of Clause (k) in the UCPA has thus opened a new avenue for regulating the misappropriation of data under intellectual property law. Nonetheless, numerous debates regarding the legislative necessity, the scope, and the applicability of this provision emerged during its inception. The complex factual requirements have led to interpretative challenges and disagreements. Given that more than two years have elapsed since its implementation, it is imperative to review these requirements and legal issues and to consider potential improvements if necessary. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Clause (k) and sequentially examine the major legal issues based on this foundation.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 박성호, "저작권법" (2023), 박영사
  2. 윤선희, "지적재산권법" (2018), 세창출판사
  3. 이해완, "신저작권법입문" (2024), 박영사
  4. 문선영, "특허법상 간접침해 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2016
  5. 박정훈, "데이터 관련 법률 규정의 해석 및 입법론에 관한 고찰―저작권법과의 관계를 중심으로", 지식재산연구, 17(2) (2022), 한국지식재산연구원
  6. 이규호, "2021년 개정 부정경쟁방지법상 데이터의 부정사용행위의 판단기준에 대한 연구", 중앙법학, 24(2) (2022), 중앙법학회
  7. 임원선, "데이터의 법적 보호와 저작권법 우선적용의 원칙", 경영법률, 31(3) (2021), 한국경영법률학회
  8. 차상육, "2021년 개정 부정경쟁방지법상 데이터 보호와 부정사용행위의 규제", 정보법학, 26(2) (2022), 한국정보법학회
  9. 최기성, "개정 부정경쟁방지법상 데이터 보호에 관한 소고", 법학연구, 63(1)통권 : 111 (2022), 부산대학교 법학연구소
  10. 한지영, "저작권법상 데이터베이스관련 규정의 해석에 관한 고찰", 인권과 정의, 355 (2006), 대한변호사협회
  11. 특허청, "데이터 보호를 위한 부정경쟁방지법 개정사항 안내서", ~ (2022)
  12. 小野 昌延, "新・注解不正競争防止法 (下巻)" (2012), 青林書院
  13. 経済産業省 知的財産政策室, "逐条解説 不正競争防止法(令和6年24月01日施行版)", ~ (2024)
  14. 奥邨 弘司, "人工知能に特有の知的成果物の営業秘密・限定提供データ該当性", 法律時報, 91(8) (2019), 日本評論社
  15. 田村善之, "年報知的財産法 2018-2019" (2018), 日本評論社
  16. 重冨貴光, "限定提供データ保護について", パテント, 73(8 (別冊 No.23)) (2020), 日本弁理士会
  17. 経済産業省, "限定提供データに関する指針(最終改正)", ~ (2024)
  18. "不正競争防止法平成30年改正の概要, 15頁"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)