소년법원에서 시민참가형 재판제도에 관한 일고찰 - 프랑스와 영국의 소년재판을 중심으로 하여 -
A Study on the Civic Participation Trials in Juvenile Courts -Focusing on the Juvenile Trials in France and England-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are certainly some merits in obtaining reasonable judgements as well as in getting appropriate treatments for the young offenders when civil and community people directly take part in the juvenile court trials. Likewise, the French and British juvenile courts are also practicing the Civic Participation System by Continental Mixed System and the Magistrates(Lay Judges)' Court System respectively, and their judgements show that the major purpose of youth trials is providing better education and rehabilitation for young offenders rather than just punishing them. The brief summary of the research paper is as follows. First, there is a major thing in common in the French Juvenile Courts and British youth courts: They have the closed-door and confrontation trials in the form of Civic Participation System. Second, the French Civic Participation System by Continental Mixed Jury System is composed of two civic judges and one professional judge. And the civic judges' experiences and the legal judge's professional knowledge seem to be harmoniously combined and pass careful and fair judgements for young offenders. In the same manner, the British Youth Courts also manage the traditional Magistrates-centered trials, and it shows that they conduct the juvenile justice deeply related to community and civil participation. Third, an Éducateur plays a very important role in the sense of examining and supporting youth offenders in the French Juvenile Courts. Just like the French Éducateur, the British Youth Courts also have the similar system called Youth Offending Team. Both systems can be highly appraised because they are actively supporting for the youth offenders'social environment and practical rehabilitation. Finally, it is definitely worthwhile for the better Korean juvenile justice to review some points of French and British juvenile justice systems based on civic participation trials, such as civic judges and prosecutors attendance and Éducateur and Youth Offending Team's participation in the juvenile trials.
Abstract
There are certainly some merits in obtaining reasonable judgements as well as in getting appropriate treatments for the young offenders when civil and community people directly take part in the juvenile court trials. Likewise, the French and British juvenile courts are also practicing the Civic Participation System by Continental Mixed System and the Magistrates(Lay Judges)' Court System respectively, and their judgements show that the major purpose of youth trials is providing better education and rehabilitation for young offenders rather than just punishing them. The brief summary of the research paper is as follows. First, there is a major thing in common in the French Juvenile Courts and British youth courts: They have the closed-door and confrontation trials in the form of Civic Participation System. Second, the French Civic Participation System by Continental Mixed Jury System is composed of two civic judges and one professional judge. And the civic judges' experiences and the legal judge's professional knowledge seem to be harmoniously combined and pass careful and fair judgements for young offenders. In the same manner, the British Youth Courts also manage the traditional Magistrates-centered trials, and it shows that they conduct the juvenile justice deeply related to community and civil participation. Third, an Éducateur plays a very important role in the sense of examining and supporting youth offenders in the French Juvenile Courts. Just like the French Éducateur, the British Youth Courts also have the similar system called Youth Offending Team. Both systems can be highly appraised because they are actively supporting for the youth offenders'social environment and practical rehabilitation. Finally, it is definitely worthwhile for the better Korean juvenile justice to review some points of French and British juvenile justice systems based on civic participation trials, such as civic judges and prosecutors attendance and Éducateur and Youth Offending Team's participation in the juvenile trials.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김용우, "소년법개론" (2007), 도서출판 상린
- 최종식, "소년형사사건과 국민참여재판", 형사법연구, 20(4), pp.377~400 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006), 세창출판사
- 소년사범의 적정한 처리절차에 관한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- Ashworth, A., "The Youth Court" (1992), Waterside Press
- Bottoms, A., "The Relationship between Youth Justice and Child Welfare in England and Wales. in: Youth Justice and Child Protection" (2007), Jessica Kingsley
- Gendrot, S., "France: The Politicization of Youth Justice. in: Comparative Youth Justice:Critical Issuess" (2008), SAGE
- Grahm, J., "Beyond Welfare Versus Justice:Juvenile Justice in England and Wales. in: International Handbook of Juvenile Justice" (2006), Springer
- Muncie, J., "England and Wales: The New Correctionalism. in: Comparative Youth Justice: Critical Issues" (2008), SAGE
- Wyvekens, A., "The French Juvenile Justice System. in: International Handbook of Juvenile Justice" (2006), Springer
- 滝沢, "フランス法. 第2版" (2002), 三省堂
- イギリス、ドイツ及びフランスにおける司法制度の現状, "司法研修所", 司法研修所, ~, pp.司法研究報告書、No.53 (1999)
- 少年審判に参審制をフランスㆍオーストリアの少年司法調査報告, "日本弁護士連合会司法改革推進センタ", 現代人文社, ~ (2000)
- 宇田川公輔, "イギリス少年司法の動向と少年司法手続の運用状況について", 家庭裁判月報, 61(10), pp.1~70 (2009), 最高裁判所事務総局
- 岡健太郎, "フランス共和国における少年事件処理の実情(下)", 家庭裁判月報, 51(9), pp.1~52 (1999), 最高裁判所事務総局
- 河原俊也, "2002年、2004年及び2007年法改正後のフランス共和国における少年事件処理の実情", 家庭裁判月報, 60(10), pp.2~57 (2008), 最高裁判所事務総局
- 中村義孝, "フランス司法権の特徴と重罪陪審裁判", 立命館法学, 300, pp.387~416 (2005)
- 吉中信人, "フランスの少年司法制度", 広島法学, 20(1), pp.55~90 (1992)
