본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

청소년참여법정제도에 관한 고찰 - 소년 다이버전을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Juvenile Participatory Trial System

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Together with the people participatory trial implemented from January 2008, the juvenile participatory trial system has been implemented from June 2010. The juvenile participatory trial system is different from the people participatory trial conducted by the general public as jurors to the extent that it can be seen as a participatory system limited to the juvenile protection cases with the juvenile delinquents being jurors. This juvenile participatory trial system is one that has divergent characteristics for insignificant cases and has started to promote decisions of no-trial by the juvenile department of family court. Although the system is unfamiliar to us, it is a generalized system in the U.S. as a teen court program. Under the juvenile participatory trial system, with respect to the protection disposition cases of the juvenile department of family court,juvenile delinquents conduct a peer trial with the consent of the person in question or the guardian, and through the results of the trial, an implement task is imposed upon the juvenile and a decision of no-trial is rendered considering the results of implementing the imposed task. In order to take root the juvenile participatory trial system as divergence for juveniles, prior to the active implementation, it should be necessary to secure human and material resources and conduct scientific verifications for the effects of the system.

Abstract

Together with the people participatory trial implemented from January 2008, the juvenile participatory trial system has been implemented from June 2010. The juvenile participatory trial system is different from the people participatory trial conducted by the general public as jurors to the extent that it can be seen as a participatory system limited to the juvenile protection cases with the juvenile delinquents being jurors. This juvenile participatory trial system is one that has divergent characteristics for insignificant cases and has started to promote decisions of no-trial by the juvenile department of family court. Although the system is unfamiliar to us, it is a generalized system in the U.S. as a teen court program. Under the juvenile participatory trial system, with respect to the protection disposition cases of the juvenile department of family court,juvenile delinquents conduct a peer trial with the consent of the person in question or the guardian, and through the results of the trial, an implement task is imposed upon the juvenile and a decision of no-trial is rendered considering the results of implementing the imposed task. In order to take root the juvenile participatory trial system as divergence for juveniles, prior to the active implementation, it should be necessary to secure human and material resources and conduct scientific verifications for the effects of the system.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006), 세창출판사
  2. 2006년 학생자치법정 시범학교 운영보고서, "박성혁", 법무부, ~ (2007)
  3. 영·미의 소년사법제도, "법무부", 법무부 보호국, ~ (2007)
  4. 서울소년원, "소년원학교 내 학생자치법정 운영모형 개발연구", 소년보호논집, 10 (2010)
  5. 이광수, "국민참여재판제도의 도입과 문제점", 인권과 정의, (379), pp.59~73 (2008), 대한변호사협회
  6. 이은모, "현행 국민참여재판제도의 내용과 문제점 -일본의 재판원제도와의 비교를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 26(1), pp.405~426 (2009), 법학연구소
  7. 정진연, "국민참여재판에서 한국형 배심제의 도입", 숭실대학교 법학논총, 15 (2006)
  8. 최종식, "소년형사사건과 국민참여재판", 형사법연구, 20(4), pp.377~400 (2008), 한국형사법학회
  9. 佐藤博史, "少年司法と市民參加", 少年法の課題と展望, 2 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)