본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

목회상담 관점에서 본 폴 틸리히(Paul Tillich)의 ‘중심된 자기’(the Centered Self)와 칼 융(Carl Jung)의 ‘하나님의 원형적 형상’(the Archetypal Image of God)에 관한 담론

A Discussion on Paul Tillich's Concept of 'the Centered Self' and Carl Jung's 'the Archetypal Image of God in pastoral psychological perspectives.

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

This article has begun with curiosity to define ‘the image of God’ in theological and psychological perspectives. In defining the image of God in theological views, we have encountered various opinions. But most of definitions can be deducted to two types: immanence and transcendence. In the history of Christianity most churches have interested in God’s transcendence rather than immanence in humans. Not considering about the immanence of God in human mind has brought the loss of balanced Christian perspectives on theology and psychology. Not only this, but also the loss and uninteresting of this perspective has appeared the confused identity and definition of what is pastoral counseling. Theologian Paul Tillich and psychologist Carl Jung were interested in defining the image of God. Tillich’s theological methodology is called ‘correlational methodology’ which is focused on human contexts. Thus, in order to understand well regarding humans, he deeply concerns about psychology. And his concern regarding psychology brings the definition of ‘the centered self.’ Carl Jung dialogues with theological themes, especially the image of God in psychological perspectives. His perspective on this issue is based on ‘the archetypal image of God.’ He insists that we cannot understand the image of God without knowing the archetypal image of God. Both scholars’ perspectives are strange to Christian counseling in our contexts, but these will provide us with dynamic interpretations and theological challenges to define the identity of pastoral counseling.

Abstract

This article has begun with curiosity to define ‘the image of God’ in theological and psychological perspectives. In defining the image of God in theological views, we have encountered various opinions. But most of definitions can be deducted to two types: immanence and transcendence. In the history of Christianity most churches have interested in God’s transcendence rather than immanence in humans. Not considering about the immanence of God in human mind has brought the loss of balanced Christian perspectives on theology and psychology. Not only this, but also the loss and uninteresting of this perspective has appeared the confused identity and definition of what is pastoral counseling. Theologian Paul Tillich and psychologist Carl Jung were interested in defining the image of God. Tillich’s theological methodology is called ‘correlational methodology’ which is focused on human contexts. Thus, in order to understand well regarding humans, he deeply concerns about psychology. And his concern regarding psychology brings the definition of ‘the centered self.’ Carl Jung dialogues with theological themes, especially the image of God in psychological perspectives. His perspective on this issue is based on ‘the archetypal image of God.’ He insists that we cannot understand the image of God without knowing the archetypal image of God. Both scholars’ perspectives are strange to Christian counseling in our contexts, but these will provide us with dynamic interpretations and theological challenges to define the identity of pastoral counseling.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 임경수, "인생의 봄과 가을: 중년심리이해와 분석" (2005), 학지사
  2. Braaten, Carl, "The Future of God" (1969), Harper and Row
  3. Clift, Wallace, "Tillich and Jung: A New Mythology of Salvation", Illiff Review, 32, pp.3~15 (1975)
  4. Cooper, Terry, "Paul Tillich and Psychology" (2006), Mercer University Press
  5. Dourley, John, "Carl Jung, and the Recovery of Religion" (2008), Routledge
  6. Dourley, John, "The Psyche as Sacrament: A Comparative Study of C.G. Jung and Paul Tillich" (1981), Inner City
  7. Forsyth, James, "C. G. Jung and the Ontological Argument", Encounter, 43, pp.309~317 (1982)
  8. Jaffé, Aniela, "The Myth of Meaning" (1975), Penguin Books
  9. Jung, Carl, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections" (1989), Vintage Books
  10. Jung, Carl, "Letters II" (1976), Princeton University Press
  11. Jung, Carl, "C.W. 11" (1975), Princeton University Press
  12. Jung, Carl., "C.W. 2" (1973), Princeton University Press
  13. Jung, Carl., "C.W.9(2)" (1968), Princeton University Press
  14. Lim, Justin, "Male Midlife Crisis: Psychological Analysis, Theological Interpretations, Pastoral Interventions" (2000), University Press of America
  15. McKelway, Alexander, "The Systematic Theology of Paul Tillich" (1964), Delta Book
  16. Sartre, Jean-Paul, "Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology" (1956), Philosophical Library
  17. Tillich, Paul, "The Meaning of Health" (1984), Exploration Press of Chicago Theological Seminary
  18. Tillich, Paul, "Psychoanalysis, Existentialism and Theology", Pastoral Psychology, 87, pp.16~17 (1958)
  19. Tillich, Paul, "Systematic Theology 3" (1963), University Press of America
  20. Tillich, Paul, "Systematic Theology 2" (1957), University Press of America
  21. Tillich, Paul, "Systematic Theology 1" (1951), University Press of America
  22. Yalom, Irvin, "Existential Psychotherapy" (2009), Basic Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)