Coh-Metrix를 활용한 한국과 핀란드의 대학입학시험읽기 지문 난이도 비교 연구
A Coh-Metrix analysis of reading passages in the university entrance examination of Korea and Finland
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the relative difficulty for learners of reading passages in the university entrance examinations of Korea and Finland. For this project, the English reading texts of Korean and Finnish entrance exams conducted in the past five years were assembled as corpora, and analyzed using Coh-Metrix. The findings reveal the following. First, the Finnish entrance exam consists of longer passages with a greater total number of words and sentences than the Korean exam, and focuses on extensive reading while the Korean exam emphasizes intensive reading. Second, the Korean entrance exam has a lower Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) but a higher Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) value than the Finnish exam. This means that although the Korean exam consists of short sentences, they are syntactically complex sentences, which may make it difficult for students to read and understand the passages. Third, there was a significant difference between the Basic and Advanced levels of the Finnish entrance exam, regarding frequency of content words, word length, word count, sentence length, sentence count, FRE, and FKGL. This implies that on Finnish exam, the level of difficulty is adjusted properly by type. Based on the results of this study, the investigators believe it is necessary to include both short and long passages on the Korean CSAT so that it can test a balanced reading comprehension skills of students.
Abstract
This study investigates the relative difficulty for learners of reading passages in the university entrance examinations of Korea and Finland. For this project, the English reading texts of Korean and Finnish entrance exams conducted in the past five years were assembled as corpora, and analyzed using Coh-Metrix. The findings reveal the following. First, the Finnish entrance exam consists of longer passages with a greater total number of words and sentences than the Korean exam, and focuses on extensive reading while the Korean exam emphasizes intensive reading. Second, the Korean entrance exam has a lower Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) but a higher Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) value than the Finnish exam. This means that although the Korean exam consists of short sentences, they are syntactically complex sentences, which may make it difficult for students to read and understand the passages. Third, there was a significant difference between the Basic and Advanced levels of the Finnish entrance exam, regarding frequency of content words, word length, word count, sentence length, sentence count, FRE, and FKGL. This implies that on Finnish exam, the level of difficulty is adjusted properly by type. Based on the results of this study, the investigators believe it is necessary to include both short and long passages on the Korean CSAT so that it can test a balanced reading comprehension skills of students.
참고문헌 (34)
- 고나은, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 수능 영어 읽기 영역 지문 난이도 비교: EBS-수능 연계 정책 전후", 중등영어교육, 10(4), pp.3~24 (2017), 한국중등영어교육학회
- "2022학년도 대학수학능력시험 시행기본계획(보도자료)" (2021), 교육부[URL]
- 김정렬, "수능영어 읽기 지문에 대한 통시적 Coh-Metrix 분석", 초등교과교육연구, 27(1), pp.63~78 (2017)
- 김하현, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 중학교 2학년 영어 교과서 읽기 지문의 난이도 분석", 석사, pp.2015
- 박정곤, "Coh-Metrix를 활용한 고등학교 영어 교과서와 대학수학능력시험 읽기 지문 난이도 비교 연구", 영어영문학연구, 47(3), pp.147~170 (2021), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 박주영, "국가 수준 교육과정에 나타난 한국과 핀란드의 평가 개념 분석", 석사, pp.2020
- 변지현, "중등 영어교사들의 다독 체험이 읽기 동기 부여 및 자신감 형성에 미치는 영향", 영어교과교육, 10(1), pp.119~144 (2011), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 성일호, "실제적 자료(Authentic Materials)를 활용한 영어학습 동기 향상 방안", 영어영문학연구, 29(1), pp.221~240 (2003), 대한영어영문학회
- 유미란, "고등학교 수행평가로서의 영어독서 프로그램 운영 사례 연구", 영어교과교육, 13(4), pp.171~196 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 이동주, "Coh-Metrix를 활용한 새로운 이독 지수 개발을 위한 기초 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(12), pp.1005~1027 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 이동주, "교실 수행평가의 올바른 방향" (2019), 한국문화사
- 이승환, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 고등학교 영어1과 영어2 교과서 문어 텍스트의 코퍼스 언어학적 난이도 분석", 외국어교육연구, 27(2), pp.131~148 (2013), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 이혜진, "한・중・일 대학 입학시험 영어 지문의 이독성 비교 분석", 인문사회 21, 9(5), pp.441~454 (2018), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- 장희교, "확장형 읽기 수업이 고등학생의 영어 읽기 동기와 독해전략에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2019
- 전문기, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 중학교 1학년 개정 영어 교과서의 코퍼스 언어학적 비교 분석", 영어교육연구, 21(4), pp.265~292 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- 최민주, "수능 영어 문항 유형간 응집력과 어휘정보 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(12), pp.378~385 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- "2022학년도 대학수학능력시험 출제방향(보도자료)" (2021), 한국교육과정평가원[URL]
- Brown, H. D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (2014), Pearson Education
- Brown, H. D., "Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices" (2019), Pearson Education
- Day, R. R., "Extensive reading activities for language teaching" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- "Applicants and those who accepted a place" (2021)[URL]
- "EF English Proficiency Index" (2021)[URL]
- Graesser, A. C., "Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension", Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), pp.371~398 (2011)[DOI]
- 김지선, "Effects of a spoken diary practice on EFL Learner’s speaking proficiency, attitudes and anxiety", 영어어문교육, 21(3), pp.89~114 (2015), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김미숙, "A Corpus-based Error Analysis of Spoken English Produced by University Students", 교원교육, 35(3), pp.147~164 (2019), 교육연구원[DOI]
- Yac Hao Liu, "A Study of Korean EFL Learners` WTC and Motivation", Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), pp.35~58 (2012), 범태평양 응용언어학회
- "Combining intensive and extensive reading strategies with cooperative and communicative learning activities" (2003)[URL]
- McNamara, D. S., "Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Paran, A., "English teaching essentials : Intensive reading", English Teaching Professional, 28(1), pp.40~51 (2003)
- Perfetti, C. A., "Reading ability : Lexical quality to comprehension", Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), pp.357~383 (2007)[DOI]
- Swain, M., "Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985), Newbury House
- "Digital matriculation examination" (2021)[URL]
- "Improving the comparability of grades" (2021)[URL]
- "Structure of the examination" (2022)[URL]
