상호존중의 관계를 통한 창발적 상담수퍼비전: 목회신학적 관점에서
An Emergent Supervision Through The Relationship Of Mutual Respect: From a Pastoral Theological Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Pastoral supervision is a significant method through which a counselor-intraining grows as a person and professional. In the contemporary supervision practice in the field of counseling in Korea, however, a few common counter-productive learning experiences, such as chronic sense of deficiency, inferiority, and shame, of the supervisee are identified. A cause of counterproductivity is associated with one-sided relationship between supervisor and supervisee. To resolve this problem, this article focuses on examining the relationality in supervision from a pastoral theological perspective with a special attention to the relational humanness of Jesus Christ. The examination uncovers two pillars of assumption that upholds one-sided relational structure in supervision practice: The first one is ‘objectivism’ that is deeply embedded in the counseling theories; the other one is ‘authoritarianism’ that which value is culturally condoned in social relations in Korea. To challenge the myth of two pillars, this article proposes Kohutian theory of intersubjectivity as an alternative theoretical foundation for a transformed practice of supervision in that the supervisee can utilize it more safely and freely with dignity. The theory of intersubjectivity, supported by the concept of ‘emergence’ in the natural systems theory, implies that gaining of pastoral wisdom takes place more productively as the result of mutual exchange of intersubjective experience of each person in the relationship than unilateral imposition of one’s knowledge on the other person. The exchange of intersubjective experience of each person in the relationship system does not merely lead each one to the sum of each person’s knowledge but it gives a new space for wisdom to emerge from the mutual exchange, and all participants in this process can access to this source of wisdom. This finding attests that the supervision relationship that is characterized by mutual respect, intersubjectivity, and incarnational love functions better than the one that is characterized by objectivism and authoritarianism in order for the counselor-in-training to achieve goals of pastoral supervision.
Abstract
Pastoral supervision is a significant method through which a counselor-intraining grows as a person and professional. In the contemporary supervision practice in the field of counseling in Korea, however, a few common counter-productive learning experiences, such as chronic sense of deficiency, inferiority, and shame, of the supervisee are identified. A cause of counterproductivity is associated with one-sided relationship between supervisor and supervisee. To resolve this problem, this article focuses on examining the relationality in supervision from a pastoral theological perspective with a special attention to the relational humanness of Jesus Christ. The examination uncovers two pillars of assumption that upholds one-sided relational structure in supervision practice: The first one is ‘objectivism’ that is deeply embedded in the counseling theories; the other one is ‘authoritarianism’ that which value is culturally condoned in social relations in Korea. To challenge the myth of two pillars, this article proposes Kohutian theory of intersubjectivity as an alternative theoretical foundation for a transformed practice of supervision in that the supervisee can utilize it more safely and freely with dignity. The theory of intersubjectivity, supported by the concept of ‘emergence’ in the natural systems theory, implies that gaining of pastoral wisdom takes place more productively as the result of mutual exchange of intersubjective experience of each person in the relationship than unilateral imposition of one’s knowledge on the other person. The exchange of intersubjective experience of each person in the relationship system does not merely lead each one to the sum of each person’s knowledge but it gives a new space for wisdom to emerge from the mutual exchange, and all participants in this process can access to this source of wisdom. This finding attests that the supervision relationship that is characterized by mutual respect, intersubjectivity, and incarnational love functions better than the one that is characterized by objectivism and authoritarianism in order for the counselor-in-training to achieve goals of pastoral supervision.
참고문헌 (41)
- 권진숙, "여성주의 목회신학에서 바라본 상호관계", 목회와상담, 18, pp.7~36 (2012), 한국목회상담학회[DOI]
- 권진숙, "캐리 도어링(Carrie Doehring)의 여성주의 목회 신학: 트라우마, 관계, 힘, 그리고 영성", 목회와상담, 21, pp.35~68 (2013), 한국목회상담학회
- 김경, "대중의 정신건강을 위한 목회상담: - 공공신학으로서의 목회신학적 관점에서 -", 신학과 실천, (36), pp.355~387 (2013), 한국실천신학회
- 김경, "현대 한국사회의 권위주의에 대한 사회구성주의 치료적 접근: 공공신학으로서의 목회상담의 관점에서", 목회와상담, 19, pp.39~72 (2012), 한국목회상담학회
- 김경, "성폭력 피해자 치유를 위한 '관계적' 신학의 고찰: 제임스 폴링의 목회신학을 중심으로", 목회와상담, 16, pp.160~188 (2011), 한국목회상담학회
- 김경, "재인간화 모델을 통한 한국인 상담 -힘의 역동과 치료적 관계를 중심으로", 한국기독교신학논총, (73), pp.341~365 (2011), 한국기독교학회
- 나우웬, 헨리, "영적발돋움" (2012), 두란노
- 니버, 리차드, "그리스도와 문화" (2007), 한국기독학생회출판부IVP
- 니콜스, 마이클P, "가족치료: 핵심개념과 실제적용" (2009), 시그마프레스
- 김계현, "상담 수퍼비전의 이론과 실제" (2013), 학지사
- 오규훈, "한국 교회의 권위주의 문화에 관한 목회상담적 고찰 - 자기(Self) 변화와 회심의 심리적 역동 -", 목회와상담, 17, pp.41~94 (2011), 한국목회상담학회
- 존슨, 스티븐, "이머전스" (2010), 김영사
- 현상규, "경청에 대한 기독심리학적 고찰", 목회와상담, 18, pp.211~237 (2012), 한국목회상담학회[DOI]
- Buber, Martin, "I and Thou" (1996), Touchstone
- Burr, Vivien, "Social Constructionism" (2003), Routledge
- Brandchaft, Bernard, "The Annual of Psychoanalysis 18" (1990), The Analytic Press
- Cooper-White, Pamela, "Shared Wisdom: Use of the Self in Pastoral Care and Counseling" (2004), Fortress Press
- DeLong, William R, "From Object to Subject: Pastoral Supervision as an Intersubjective Activity", The Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 56, pp.51~61 (2002)
- Gergen, Kenneth, "Toward a Transformation in Social Knowledge" (1982), Springer-Verlag
- Graham, Larry Kent, "Pastoral Theology as Public Theology In Relation To The Clinic", Journal of Pastoral Theology, 9, pp.1~17 (2000)
- Heimann, Paula, "On Counter-transference", The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, pp.81~84 (1950)
- Hill, Wayne, "Collaborative Pastoral Care and Counseling Supervisory Model", The Journal of Pastoral Care, 55, pp.69~73 (2001)
- Kohut, Heinz, "How Does Analysis Cure?" (1984), University of Chicago Press
- Kohut, Heinz, "The Search for the Self" (1978), International Universities Press
- Leach, Jane, "Pastoral Supervision: A Handbook" (2010), SCM Press
- Lee, Ronald, "Psychotherapy after Kohut" (1991), The Analytic Press
- McCluskey, Patricia A., "Weaving the Threads: A Theory of Pastoral Supervision", Reflective Practice: Formation and Supervision in Ministry, 28, pp.221~235 (2008)
- Moltmann, Jürgen, "Experiences in Theology" (1993), Fortress Press
- Moltmann, Jürgen, "The Way of Jesus Christ; Christology in Messianic Dimensions" (1993), Fortress Press
- Orange, Donna, "Emotional Understanding: Studies in Psychoanalytic Epistemology" (1995), The Guilford Press
- Palmer, Parker, "To Know as We are Known" (1983), Harper & Row
- Patton, John, "Pastoral Care: An Essential Guide" (2005), Abingdon Press
- Patton, John, "Pastoral Care In Context: An Introduction to Pastoral Care" (2005), Westminster John Knox Press
- Patton, John, "Pastoral Counseling: A Ministry of the Church" (1983), Abingdon Press
- Pembroke, Neil, "Renewing Pastoral Practice: Trinitarian Perspective on Pastoral Care and Counseling" (2006), Ashgate
- Rader, Blaine B., "Supervision of Pastoral Psychotherapy", The Journal of Pastoral Care, 31, pp.178~185 (1977)
- Solnit, A. J, "Learning from Psychoanalytic Supervision", International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51, pp.359~362 (1970)
- Steere, David, A., "The Supervision of Pastoral Care", pp.1989, Westminster
- Stolorow, Robert, "Deconstructing the Myth of the Neutral Analyst: An Alternative from Intersubjective Systems Theory", Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 66, pp.431~449 (1997)
- Stolorow, Robert, "Bradchaft, Bernard, and Atwood, George. Psychoanalytic Treatment:An Intersubjective Approach" (1987), The Analytic Press
- Winnicott, Donal W., "Hate in the Counter-Transference", Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 3, pp.350~356 (1984)