본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소년원 임시퇴원제도에 대한 정책적・입법적 개선방안

A Study on the Reorganization of Release on Parole from Juvenile Reformatory

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In the Juvenile Act, there is a protective disposition for resocialization from an educational point of view that helps juvenile offenders grow into healthy adults. The reason why we are preparing a juvenile criminal justice policy separately from the criminal justice policy for adults is that we believe that juvenile offenders have a higher potential for education and improvement than adult offenders. It is necessary to help juvenile grow into healthy adults rather than stigmatizing them as criminals and punishing them even if they commit crimes. The Juvenile Reformatory provides education such as subject education, vocational competency development training, and certification exam so that juvenile in protection can be nurtured so that they can return to society as healthy juveniles. Among juveniles detained in Juvenile Reformatory, if it is recognized that the purpose of correction has been achieved because of good correctional grades, they are subject to ‘Release on Parole’ or ‘Release’ pursuant to Article 44 of ‘Act on the Treatment of Protected Juveniles’. Protective juveniles imposed with disposition No. 9 will be ‘Release on Parole’ from the Juvenile Reformatory with about one month remaining. Upon release on parole, the juvenile will be charged with probation for six months. Because of the situation in which they will receive probation for a period that is about six times the remaining period, juvenile in probation often think that release on parole is rather unfavorable treatment. In principle, it is reasonable that the probation imposed along with Release on Parole should be for the remainder of the confinement period. For the judgment of Release on Parole, it is necessary to make a specific evaluation using various currently developed recidivism risk assessment tools. If necessary, it is also necessary to actively review the development of a tool to evaluate the recidivism risk of children in protection.

Abstract

In the Juvenile Act, there is a protective disposition for resocialization from an educational point of view that helps juvenile offenders grow into healthy adults. The reason why we are preparing a juvenile criminal justice policy separately from the criminal justice policy for adults is that we believe that juvenile offenders have a higher potential for education and improvement than adult offenders. It is necessary to help juvenile grow into healthy adults rather than stigmatizing them as criminals and punishing them even if they commit crimes. The Juvenile Reformatory provides education such as subject education, vocational competency development training, and certification exam so that juvenile in protection can be nurtured so that they can return to society as healthy juveniles. Among juveniles detained in Juvenile Reformatory, if it is recognized that the purpose of correction has been achieved because of good correctional grades, they are subject to ‘Release on Parole’ or ‘Release’ pursuant to Article 44 of ‘Act on the Treatment of Protected Juveniles’. Protective juveniles imposed with disposition No. 9 will be ‘Release on Parole’ from the Juvenile Reformatory with about one month remaining. Upon release on parole, the juvenile will be charged with probation for six months. Because of the situation in which they will receive probation for a period that is about six times the remaining period, juvenile in probation often think that release on parole is rather unfavorable treatment. In principle, it is reasonable that the probation imposed along with Release on Parole should be for the remainder of the confinement period. For the judgment of Release on Parole, it is necessary to make a specific evaluation using various currently developed recidivism risk assessment tools. If necessary, it is also necessary to actively review the development of a tool to evaluate the recidivism risk of children in protection.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 소년보호처분유형의 결정요인에 관한 연구, "김지선", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2000)
  2. 김지선, "소년원 퇴원자의 사회복귀프로그램 효율성 제고", 소년보호연구, (10) (2007)
  3. 김혜정, "소년원 임시퇴원자에 대한 보호관찰에관한 소고", 보호관찰, 12(1), pp.133~163 (2012), 한국보호관찰학회[DOI]
  4. 김혜정, "소년법상 보호처분의 성격과 전자장치부착명령 요건과의 관계", 형사판례연구, 21, pp.617~642 (2013), 한국형사판례연구회[DOI]
  5. 김혜정, "대체형벌론" (2017), 피앤씨미디어
  6. 박성훈, "소년원 출원생 사회정착업무에 대한 보호기관 종사자의 인식: 소년원 직원 및 임시퇴원담당 보호관찰관을 중심으로", 소년보호연구, 31(2), pp.57~93 (2018), 한국소년정책학회[DOI]
  7. 배종대, "형사정책" (2016), 홍문사
  8. 배종대, "형사정책" (2019), 홍문사
  9. 법무연수원, "2011 범죄백서" (2012)
  10. 법무연수원, "2020 범죄백서" (2021)
  11. 윤웅장, "「소년법」상 수용보호처분의 문제점과 개선방안", 한국공안행정학회보, 29(4), pp.303~334 (2020), 한국공안행정학회[DOI]
  12. 소년원 가퇴원자 보호관찰 실태 및 개선방안에 관한 연구, "이성칠", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 02-23 (2002)
  13. 이수현, "소년보호처분에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (35), pp.337~356 (2009), 한국법학회
  14. 林尙奎, "소년법상의 보호정신", 교정연구, 15, pp.31~63 (2002), 한국교정학회
  15. 정희철, "비례성원칙과 보호처분: 해석론과 적용가능성을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.189~212 (2007), 한국형사법무정책연구원
  16. 조윤오, "소년원 임시퇴원 기각결정과 재범발생 간의 관계", 형사정책, 32(3), pp.261~288 (2020), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
  17. 최종식, "소년법상 보호처분의 본질에 관한 고찰", 소년보호연구, (3) (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)