미국의 성인 및 소년 대상 전자감독제도 - 준수사항 위반과 제재조치 중심으로 -
Electronic Monitoring of Adult and Juvenile Offenders in the United States — A Focus on Supervision Compliance and Violation Sanctions —
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 2008, South Korea introduced an electronic monitoring system to prevent sex offenders from reoffending, and since then, it has gradually expanded its use to include offenders on post-release and parole supervision. As a result, the number of people under electronic monitoring supervision in South Korea has significantly increased, including those on pre-trial release. This study aims to provide an overview of electronic monitoring supervision in the United States, which has a longer history of using electronic supervision for both adult and juvenile offenders than South Korea. In the United States, electronic supervision is used as a means of reducing recidivism and closely monitoring the behavior of juvenile offenders. South Korea, on the other hand, does not currently use electronic monitoring for juveniles, despite facing issues such as correctional overcrowding and staff shortages in community corrections. Given the potential effectiveness of electronic supervision in addressing these issues, introducing electronic monitoring for juveniles in South Korea could be a valuable option to consider. However, it is important to carefully plan and individualize supervision conditions in order to effectively meet the needs and circumstances of each juvenile before implementing this approach. It is also essential to increase public awareness of the importance of these measures for the rehabilitation and successful reintegration of juveniles into society.
Abstract
In 2008, South Korea introduced an electronic monitoring system to prevent sex offenders from reoffending, and since then, it has gradually expanded its use to include offenders on post-release and parole supervision. As a result, the number of people under electronic monitoring supervision in South Korea has significantly increased, including those on pre-trial release. This study aims to provide an overview of electronic monitoring supervision in the United States, which has a longer history of using electronic supervision for both adult and juvenile offenders than South Korea. In the United States, electronic supervision is used as a means of reducing recidivism and closely monitoring the behavior of juvenile offenders. South Korea, on the other hand, does not currently use electronic monitoring for juveniles, despite facing issues such as correctional overcrowding and staff shortages in community corrections. Given the potential effectiveness of electronic supervision in addressing these issues, introducing electronic monitoring for juveniles in South Korea could be a valuable option to consider. However, it is important to carefully plan and individualize supervision conditions in order to effectively meet the needs and circumstances of each juvenile before implementing this approach. It is also essential to increase public awareness of the importance of these measures for the rehabilitation and successful reintegration of juveniles into society.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김정환, "전자감독제도를 통한 소년범죄자의 단기자유형과 벌금형의 대체", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.219~246 (2011), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 중형주의 형사제재의 실효성에 관한 평가연구( ) - 전자감독제도의 실효성 평가연구-, "김지선", 한국형사법무정책연구원, ~ (2021)
- 김태명, "다이버전의 발상.전개와 경찰다이버전의 도입", 경찰학연구, 11(2), pp.73~100 (2011), 경찰대학[DOI]
- 재범방지를 위한 범죄자처우의 과학화에 관한 연구( ) : 전자감독에 관한 연구, "박선영", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 박정일, "사회 내 보안처분으로서 보호관찰의실효성 제고방안- 보호관찰 특별준수사항을 중심으로 -", 고려법학, (96), pp.213~255 (2020), 법학연구원
- 배상균, "소년범의 재범방지대책으로서 전자감독제도 검토", 보호관찰, 22(1), pp.1~24 (2022), 한국보호관찰학회[DOI]
- 정신교, "소년범 사회내처우의 실효성 확보방안", 치안정책연구, 31(2), pp.141~170 (2017), 치안정책연구소[DOI]
- 조윤오, "영국 경찰의 소년 다이버전 정책에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 12(3), pp.145~176 (2012), 경찰대학[DOI]
- 조윤오, "소년보호관찰대상자에 대한 전자감시 도입 논의 고찰: 영국 사례를 중심으로", 한국공안행정학회보, 22(2), pp.253~280 (2013), 한국공안행정학회
- 전자감독 특별사법경찰제도 시행 및 개선방안에 관한 연구, "최지선", 한국형사법무정책연구원, ~ (2021)
- Alternatives to the secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders, "Austin, J.", US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, ~ (2005)
- "Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 202(b)", ~ (2015)
- "Cal. Welf. and Inst. Code § 871(d)", ~ (2008)
- Crump, C., "Tracking the trackers: An examination of electronic monitoring of youth in practice", UC Davis L. Rev., 53, pp.795~ (2019)
- Dowden, C., "Ameta-analysis of the effectiveness of electronic monitoring", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(5), pp.566~591 (2001)
- Drake, G. B., "Offender tracking in the United States", CEP conference on Electronic Monitoring held from the 7th to the 9th of May, pp.1~11 (2009)
- Use of electronic offender-tracking devices expands sharply, "Fahy, S.", The Pew Charitable Trusts, 1~6 (2016)
- Gaffney, H., "The relationship between electronic monitoring and family functioningamong juvenile offenders", Children and Youth Services Review, 101, pp.267~274 (2019)
- Geoghegan, R., "Future of corrections" (2012), Policy Exchange
- "Incarcerated at home: The rise of ankle monitors and house arrest during the pandemic" (2021)[URL]
- Gottfredson, D. C., "Graduated sanctions and parole revocation : A test of general deterrence theory", Criminology, 44(3), pp.595~634 (2006)
- Gowen, D., "Overview of the federal home confinement program 1988-1996", Fed. Probation, 64, pp.11~ (2000)
- "Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1", ~ (2010)
- Hemmens, C., "Electronic monitoring and recidivisms among juvenile offenders : An analysis of state and local programs", Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28(2), pp.225~244 (2012)
- Horowitz, J., "Probation and parole systems marked by high stakes, missed opportunities: 1 in 55 U.S. adults is under community supervision", The Pew Charitable Trusts, 1~22 (2018)
- Hucklesby, A., "Vehicles of desistance? The impact of electronically monitored curfew orders", Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(1), pp.51~71 (2008)
- Electronic monitoring in England and Wales, "Hucklesby, A.", University of Leeds, ~ (2016)
- Leach, M. M., "Electronic monitoring and recidivism among high-risk juvenile offenders : A quasi-experimental study", Journal of Researchin Crime and Delinquency, 54(2), pp.237~257 (2017)
- LeBel, T., "The effectiveness of electronic monitoring for high-risk offenders : A meta-analysis", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(4), pp.353~371 (2010)
- LeBel, T., "Does the intensity of parole supervision affect recidivism? A multilevel analysis", Criminology, 48(2), pp.511~540 (2010)
- Lilly, J. R., "A brief history of house arrest and electronic monitoring", N. Ky. L. Rev., 13, pp.343~374 (1986)
- Lowry, J., "Responding to the challenges of violent extremism", terrorism cases for United States Probation and Pretrial Services, 2018, pp.17, 78~
- Mohan, J. F., "A community's response to a shocking crime : The Jessica Lunsford Act and the Florida Sexual Offender Registry", Suffolk UL Rev, 40, pp.703~ (2006)
- Myers, R., "Monitoring sex offenders by GPS : When technology outruns the law", Journal of Offender Monitoring, 23(2), pp.23~26 (2011)
- "State crime legislation 2006" (2007)[URL]
- "COVID-19: The pandemic’s impact on prisons and jails" (2021)[URL]
- Delinquency cases in juvenile court, 2010, "Puzzanchera, C.", 1~4 (2014)
- Trends in youth arrests for violent crimes, "Ryan, L.", ~ (2022)
- "Research briefing: State use of electronic monitoring" (2019)[URL]
- "Mass incarceration: The wholepie 2022" (2022)[URL]
- "Covid-19 created a bigger market for electronic ankle monitors" (2020)[URL]
- "Policy and operating procedure: Super-intensive supervision program" (2021)[URL]
- Thompson, W. E., "Juvenile delinquency: A sociological approach" (2016), Rowman & Littlefield
- Weisburd, K., "Monitoring youth: The collision of rights and rehabilitation", Iowa L. Rev., 101, pp.297~341 (2015)
- Electronic prisons: The operation of ankle monitoring in the criminal legal system, "Weisburd, D.", GWU Legal Studies, ~ (2021)