본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 국선보조인제도의 현황 및 그 시사점

Current Status and Implications of the Court-Appointed Assistant System in Japan

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Protection procedures, which were based only on the Juvenile Act in the past, have been extended to family protection cases, child protection cases, and child victim protection order cases. In addition, in these cases, the court-appointed assistant system for legal assistance of actors or children affected has also been expanded. However, despite the purpose of the court-appointed assistant system to guarantee actors’ rights or protect the fundamental rights of victims, it is difficult to assert that the system is operating for its original purpose due to questions about the nature and function of the court-appointed assistant and budget problems. In this situation, reviewing the contents and operation status of foreign systems can be an important reference for improving our system, and the Japanese system, which has a similar system to ours, is of great value. In Japan, only lawyers can become public assistants in juvenile protection cases, and the problem of blind spots in legal support for the vulnerable is solved by utilizing the duty assistant system. In addition, the Japan Legal Support Center not only manages public assistance-related projects but also manages court-appointed defense counsels and attorneys at law for victims. In addition, in consideration of the difficulty of the trial, the standards for payment of attorney fees suitable for each characteristic are stipulated in detail. In particular, it is impressive that it is designed to enable practical legal assistance by establishing a performance-based pay system.

Abstract

Protection procedures, which were based only on the Juvenile Act in the past, have been extended to family protection cases, child protection cases, and child victim protection order cases. In addition, in these cases, the court-appointed assistant system for legal assistance of actors or children affected has also been expanded. However, despite the purpose of the court-appointed assistant system to guarantee actors’ rights or protect the fundamental rights of victims, it is difficult to assert that the system is operating for its original purpose due to questions about the nature and function of the court-appointed assistant and budget problems. In this situation, reviewing the contents and operation status of foreign systems can be an important reference for improving our system, and the Japanese system, which has a similar system to ours, is of great value. In Japan, only lawyers can become public assistants in juvenile protection cases, and the problem of blind spots in legal support for the vulnerable is solved by utilizing the duty assistant system. In addition, the Japan Legal Support Center not only manages public assistance-related projects but also manages court-appointed defense counsels and attorneys at law for victims. In addition, in consideration of the difficulty of the trial, the standards for payment of attorney fees suitable for each characteristic are stipulated in detail. In particular, it is impressive that it is designed to enable practical legal assistance by establishing a performance-based pay system.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 김혁, "소년의 법률조력을 받을 권리와 보조인 제도의 재조명", 형사법연구, 32(1), pp.139~165 (2020), 한국형사법학회
  2. 소년 국선보조인제도의 운영현황과 개선방안에 관한 연구, "황지태", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2016)
  3. 카와이데 토시히로, "소년법" (2016), 박영사
  4. 少年法等の一部を改正する法律及び少年審判規則等の一部を改正する規則の解説, "甲斐行夫", 法曹会, ~ (2002)
  5. 高井吉夫, "付添人制度と適正手続について", 判例タイムズ, (287) (1973)
  6. 廣瀬健二, "付添人の役割と課題 : 国選付添人制度拡充にあたって", 総合法律支援論叢, (3) (2013)
  7. 廣瀬健二, "少年法" (2021), 成文堂
  8. 多田元, "加藤幸雄ほか, 司法福祉の焦点" (1994), ミネルヴァ書房
  9. 団藤重光, "新版少年法" (1984), 有斐閣
  10. 福岡県弁護士会子どもの権利委員会, "少年事件付添人マニュアル" (2013), 日本評論社
  11. 少年審判制度が変わるー全件付添人制度の実証的研究, "福岡県弁護士会子どもの権利委員会", 商事法務, ~ (2006)
  12. 少年事件の処理に関する実務上の諸問題ー否認事件を中心としてー, "浜井一夫", 法曹会, ~ (1997)
  13. 三浦透, "付添人の役割について", 家庭裁判所月報, 59(4) (2007)
  14. 西岡清一郎, "少年警察に臨むこと", 警察学論集, 45(2) (1992)
  15. 須納瀬学, "全面的国選付添人制度の実現にむけて", 自由と正義, 64(10) (2013)
  16. 阿部俊二, "少年事件と弁護人", 家庭裁判所月報, 29(8) (1977)
  17. 日本弁護士連合会, "弁護士白書" (2021)
  18. 日本司法支援センター(法テラス), "国選弁護関連業務の解説", ~ (2022)
  19. 日本司法支援センター(法テラス), "国選付添人関連事業の解説", ~ (2021)
  20. 国選被害者参加弁護士契約約款 報酬基準について, "日本司法支援センター(法テラス)", ~ (2019)
  21. 日本司法支援センター(法テラス), "法テラス白書" (2021)
  22. 田宮裕, "注釈少年法" (2017), 有斐閣
  23. 第二東京弁護士会子どもの権利に関する委員会, "新 少年事件実務ガイド" (2015), 現大人文社
  24. 佐伯仁志, "少年保護手続きにおける適正手続保障と弁護人の援助を受ける権利", 法曹時報, 48(12) (1996)
  25. 中村功一, "少年法の一部を改正する法律について", 法曹時報, 66(8) (2014)
  26. 川村百合, "弁護人 付添人のための少年事件実務の手引き" (2011), ぎょうせい
  27. 平場安治, "少年法" (1987), 有斐閣
  28. 河原俊, "ケースから読み解く少年事件 実務の技" (2017), 青林書院
  29. 南山法学, "少年事件における弁護士付添人の関わり", 南山法学, 41(3) (2018)
  30. "일본사법지원센터 홈페이지"[URL]
  31. "후쿠오카 변호사회 홈페이지"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)