본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일의 소년범죄 대응 현황 및 그 시사점

The Response to Juvenile Delinquency in Germany and its Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

We have been contemplating the appropriate response to juvenile crime for a long time. Despite various attempts, we are still struggling to adequately address juvenile crimes and fostering the healthy growth of juveniles remains challenging. To achieve this, it is important to enhance the effectiveness of education when protective measures against juvenile delinquency. The Ministry of Justice has announced plans to strengthen education in detention centers and to establish juvenile delinquency prevention centers in the private sector, focusing on educational principles to properly educate morally and mentally immature juveniles. To successfully implement this plan, this paper analyzes Germany's juvenile justice system and draw insights from it. In Germany, when disciplining juvenile offenders, care is taken to ensure that the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are observed. Informal measures, such as diversion and offender-victim mediation, are prioritized, followed by community-based measures, and then measures in facilities. Among the community-based measures, supportive disciplines are prioritized over repressive sanctions. By structuring sanctions in this way, the most appropriate and least burdensome measures are imposed on the juvenile offender. In Germany, the “Jugendamt” is comprehensively responsible for child and juvenile welfare from a socio-educational perspective. It forms a tripartite relationship with parents and private welfare organizations to support appropriate childcare and actively assists children and juveniles at risk. Employees of the “Jugendamt” function as juvenile justice officers under the Juvenile Court Act. They do not merely investigate and supervise juvenile offenders but also support and guide juveniles throughout the entire judicial process, providing educational assistance. Establishing a comprehensive child and juvenile welfare organization like the “Jugendamt” would help promote their welfare consistently and systematically while also maintaining and enhancing the professionalism of the relevant tasks.

Abstract

We have been contemplating the appropriate response to juvenile crime for a long time. Despite various attempts, we are still struggling to adequately address juvenile crimes and fostering the healthy growth of juveniles remains challenging. To achieve this, it is important to enhance the effectiveness of education when protective measures against juvenile delinquency. The Ministry of Justice has announced plans to strengthen education in detention centers and to establish juvenile delinquency prevention centers in the private sector, focusing on educational principles to properly educate morally and mentally immature juveniles. To successfully implement this plan, this paper analyzes Germany's juvenile justice system and draw insights from it. In Germany, when disciplining juvenile offenders, care is taken to ensure that the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are observed. Informal measures, such as diversion and offender-victim mediation, are prioritized, followed by community-based measures, and then measures in facilities. Among the community-based measures, supportive disciplines are prioritized over repressive sanctions. By structuring sanctions in this way, the most appropriate and least burdensome measures are imposed on the juvenile offender. In Germany, the “Jugendamt” is comprehensively responsible for child and juvenile welfare from a socio-educational perspective. It forms a tripartite relationship with parents and private welfare organizations to support appropriate childcare and actively assists children and juveniles at risk. Employees of the “Jugendamt” function as juvenile justice officers under the Juvenile Court Act. They do not merely investigate and supervise juvenile offenders but also support and guide juveniles throughout the entire judicial process, providing educational assistance. Establishing a comprehensive child and juvenile welfare organization like the “Jugendamt” would help promote their welfare consistently and systematically while also maintaining and enhancing the professionalism of the relevant tasks.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 김성은, "소년의 책임능력과 형사책임 : 책임능력의 평가문제를 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 27(3) (2016)
  2. 김영미, "독일의 아동⋅청소년복지법제와 시사점", 사회복지법제연구, 9(1) (2018)
  3. 김웅수, "독일의 소년보호정책과 법적 지원에 관한 연구", 사회복지법제연구, 9(2) (2018)
  4. 박성훈, "형사미성년자 연령을 둘러싼 증거기반(evidence-based)연구의 검토와 전망", 형사정책연구, 34(3) (2023)
  5. 법무부, "외국의 소년사법제도", 법무부 보호국, ~ (2005)
  6. 이진국, "독일 소년형법의 개혁에 관한 최근 논의", 형사정책연구소식, 73 (2002)
  7. 각국의 소년원제도에 관한 연구, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
  8. 조광국, "독일의 소년형사사법제도-일반 형사절차에 대한 특수성과 보호처분 및 소년형벌의 종류와 체계를 중심으로", 외국사법연수논집, 32 (2013), 법원도서관
  9. Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz, "Jugendkriminalität und Jugendstrafrecht, Informationen zur Jugendkriminalität und zur Jugendstrafrechtspflege in Bayern", ~ (2022)
  10. Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz, "Justizvollzug in Bayern - Übersicht", ~ (2022)
  11. Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz, "Justizvollzugsanstalt Neuburg-Herrenwörth -Kurzübersicht", ~ (2020)
  12. Deutsches Jugendinstitut, "Zahlen ‒ Daten ‒ Fakten Jugendgewalt, Arbeitsstelle Kinderund Jugendkriminalitätsprävention", ~ (2021)
  13. DVJJ e. V., "Mindeststandards für den Jugendstrafvollzug", Neue Kriminalpolitik, 19(1) (2007)
  14. Eisenberg, Ulrich, "Jugendgerichtsgesetz: JGG" (2023), C. H. BECK
  15. Heinz, Wolfgang, "Das strafrechtliche Sanktionensystem 1882-2012, Version 1", 2014, 2014
  16. Laue, Christian, "Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch: StGB, Band 7:Nebenstrafrecht I, JGG" (2022), C. H. BECK
  17. Ostendorf, Heribert, "Jugendstrafrecht" (2017), Nomos
  18. Statistisches Bundesamt, "Strafverfolgung, Fachserie 10, Reihe 3", ~ (2021)
  19. Walkenhorst, Philipp, "Jugendstrafvollzug", Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte(APuZ)7, 2010 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)