본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

現代武力衝突法의 規範的 特性과 實效性의 문제

The Normative Characters and the Issue of the Effectiveness of the Law of Modern Armed Conflicts

유재형
법학연구소 (The Institute of Legal Studies Konkuk University)|2009.02|외법논집 (HUFS Law Review)|제33권 제1호|pp. 235-281|DOI 10.17257/hufslr.2009.33.1.235

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

상호주의실효성ReciprocityCountermeasures대항조치무력충돌법Law of Armed Conflicts군사적 필요성總加入條項戰數戰時復仇Hague법Geneva법Wirksamkeit / EffectivenessGeneral Participation ClauseKriegsraisonMilitary NecessityWar(belligerent) ReprisalHague LawGeneva Law
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

This paper is to study the normative characters and the issue of the effectiveness of the law of modern armed conflicts. The study shows the following areas. 1) The law of armed conflicts is composed of the law of belligerence and the law of neutrality. Today, under the UN system, a war is illegal. Therefore. instead of the word 'the law of war', it's called the law of armed conflicts or the international humanitarian law. And the law of armed conflicts is about two different laws which are the legality of war (jus ad bellum) and the method of war (jus in bello). Nowadays, the law about the method of war (jus in bello) has been developed and improved highly. 2) Based on the basic structural analysis, the normative characters of the law of armed conflicts are analyzed. The law of armed conflicts is based on the two conflicting elements, the military necessity and the principle of humanity. In the past, the military necessity was more important, but in modern international society, the principle of humanity has become far more important. Therefore, the Hague Law with emphasis on military necessity and the Geneva Law with the principle of humanity are becoming united. And we can see that many of these normative laws have become customized. Especially, this unification phenomenon is very clear in the 1977's 1st Geneva additional protocol to the Geneva Conventions. As a result, the prohibitive elements of the war reprisal have become a lot more widened. This is the way of securing the execution of the law of armed conflicts, and takes away the right to the war reprisal which has been permitted to the belligerent countries until now. Related to the problem of securing the effectiveness of the law of armed conflicts, it suggests a very important issue. 3) Here, in this third area of the study, securing the binding force of the law of armed conflicts, Wirksamkeit and war reprisal as argument points are analyzed. First of all, the problem of Wirksamkeit can not be acknowledged. Like what J. Westlake said, the laws of war are the product of the compromise between military necessity and humanitarian principle. Here, the military necessity is already considered, so the meaning of making the law of armed conflicts vanishes if the rules of war are abandoned by the military necessity. Merely, the military necessity should be recognized only in case of confirming it as the international customary laws and of permitting it as the treaties. In this way, Wirksamkeit could be separated the classical(or broad) one from the modern(or narrow) one which means the military necessity; accordingly, in modern case, the latter should be accepted. And concerning the military necessity, some scholars insist that the anticipatory self-defence should be admitted, but it is not easy to permit this when the abuse of the right of self-defence is considered, even in the interpretation of the UN Charter. On the other hand, for the problem of the war reprisal, there's a tremendous conflict between pros and cons. However, in reality, as the system of the compulsory enforcement of the international law is weak, the war reprisal must be permitted only when it has the appropriate conditions. Therefore, in conclusion, to increase the effectiveness of the law of armed conflicts, the content of deeds norms should be broadened for belligerent countries as well as the process of securing the execution should be improved. And the constituents of the international society, individuals as well as countries, need a firm will to abide by the law of armed conflicts.

참고문헌 (89)

  1. 김대순, "국제법론 (제14판)" (2009), 삼영사
  2. 유병화, "국제법Ⅱ" (1995), 진성사
  3. 이한기, "국제법강의" (2007), 박영사
  4. 이병조, "국제법신강 제9개정판" (2008), 일조각
  5. 이민효, "무력분쟁과 국제법" (2008), 연경문화사
  6. 정운장, "국제인도법" (1994), 영남대학교출판부
  7. Mulinen, "군대를 위한 전쟁법", 대한적십자사 인도법연구소, ~ (1993)
  8. 대한적십자사, "전쟁희생자 보호에 관한 1949년 8월 12일자 제네바 4개 협약과 1977년 6월 8일자 추가 의정서" (2002), 성심인쇄사
  9. 국방부, "전쟁법 해설서 증보판", ~ (2007)
  10. 李希昆, "國際法" (2002), 重慶大學出版社
  11. 邵津, "國際法" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  12. 田畑茂二郞, "ケース ブックク國際法 (新版)" (1995), 有信堂
  13. 山上賢一, "現代の法學入門 (第4版)" (2007), 中央經濟社
  14. 杉原高嶺, "國際法講義" (2008), 有斐閣
  15. 大沼保昭, "國際法" (2005), 東信堂
  16. 家正治, "國際紛爭と國際法" (2008), 嵯峨野書院
  17. 山本草二, "國際法 (新版)" (1994), 有斐閣
  18. 前原光雄, "戰爭法" (1943), ダイヤモンド社
  19. 竹本正幸, "國際人道法の再確認と發展" (1996), 東信堂
  20. 橫田喜三郞, "國際條約集" (1950), 有斐閣
  21. 石本泰雄, "國際法の構造轉換" (1998), 有信堂
  22. 藤田久一, "國際人道法 (再增補版)" (2003), 有信堂
  23. 田岡良一, "戰爭法の基本問題" (1944), 岩波書店
  24. 田岡良一, "國際法Ⅲ (新版)" (1973), 有斐閣
  25. 田中忠, "武力行使に關する國際法的規制の基本觀念, in: 現代國際法の指標" (1994), 有斐閣
  26. カール, "現代帝國主義論" (1972), 福村出版
  27. 吉田脩, "「武力規制法」の 規範構造と「戰時復仇の諸相」", 筑波法政, (33) (2002)
  28. 川島武宜, "遵法精神の精神的および社會的構造(2)", 法學協會雜誌, 64(9) (1964)
  29. 藤田久一, "戰時復仇制限と1949ジュネーヴ諸條約", 法學論叢, 80(5) (1967)
  30. 眞山全, "國際刑事裁判所規程と戰爭犯罪", 國際法外交雜誌, 98(5) (1999)
  31. 岩月直樹, "紛爭の平和的解決の意義 - 復仇と對抗措置の非連續性 -", 本鄕法政紀要, (7) (1998)
  32. 尹仁河, "國際人道法における相互主義の否定への反發", 法學政治學論究, (60) (2004)
  33. Roberts A, "Documents on the Law of War, 3rd ed" (2000), Oxford University Press
  34. Henkin, Louis, "International Law, Cases and Materials" (1980), West Publishing Company
  35. Evans, Malcolm D., "International Law, 2nd ed" (2006), Oxford University Press
  36. Greenspan, Morris, "Modern Law of Land Warfare" (1959), California University Press
  37. Bishop, William W., "International Law: Case and Materials, 3rd ed." (1971), Little and Company
  38. Ott, David H., "Public International Law in the Modern World" (1987), Pitman
  39. McDougal, Myres S, "Law and Minimum World Public Order - the Legal Regulation of International Coercion" (1961), Yale University Press
  40. Kalshoven, F., "Belligerent Reprisals" (1971), Sijthoff & Noordhoff
  41. Dinstein, Yoram, "War Aggression and Self-Defence, 2nd ed" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  42. Meurer, Christain, "Die Haager Friedens Konfrenz, Vol.Ⅱ", ~ (1907)
  43. Rivier, Alphonse, "Principles de droit des gens, Tome 2", ~ (1896)
  44. Garner, James Wilford, "International Law and the World War, Vol.2" (1920), Longmans
  45. Oppenheim, L., "International Law, Vol" (1905), Longmans
  46. Westlake, John, "International Law, Part Ⅱ War" (1907), Cambridge University Press
  47. Provost, René, "International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  48. Detter, Ingrid, "The Law of War, 2nd ed" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  49. Pictet, Jean S, "Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949" (1987), Martinus Nijhoff
  50. Pictet, Jean S., "The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Commentary Ⅱ", ICRC, ~ (1994)
  51. Uhler, Oscar M, "La Convention de Genève relative a la Protection des Personne civilis en Temp de Guerre", ICRC, ~ (1956)
  52. Bernhardt, Rudolf, "Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol.Ⅱ" (1999), North-Holland
  53. Friedman, Leon, "The Law of War A Documentary History, Vol.1" (1972), Random House
  54. Verzijl, J.H.W., "Law in Historical Perspective, Part Ⅸ-A" (1978), Sijthoff & Noordhoff
  55. Dinstein, Yoram, "Military Necessity", EPIL, 3 (1997)
  56. Greenwood, C., "International Humanitarian Law(Laws of War) - Revised Report for the First Hague Peace Conference 189", The Centennial of the First International Peace Conference, Reports 6 Conclusion (2000)
  57. Greenwood, C, "Customary Law Statues of the 1977 Additional Protocols", Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, Challenges Ahead: Essays in Honour of First Kalshoven, ~ (1991)
  58. Greenwood, C., "The Twilight of the Law of Belligerent Replisals", Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 20 (1989)
  59. Verma, D.P., "Role of distinct bodies in promoting respect for international humanitarian law with particular attention to the Independent Commission on International Humanitarian Issues, in: Implementation of International Humanitarian Law" (1989), Martinus Nijhoff
  60. Schőgel, Anton, "Geneva Red Cross Convention and Protocols", EPIL, 2 (1995)
  61. Lauterpacht, H., "International Law after the Second World War, in: International Law being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Vol.2" (1975), Cambridge University Press
  62. Lauterpacht, H, "The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War", BYBIL, 29 (1952)
  63. Provost, René, "Reciprocity in Human Rights and Humanitarian Law", BYBIL, 65 (1994)
  64. Hampson, Françoise J., "Belligerent Reprisals and the 1977 Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1949", ICLQ, 37 (1988)
  65. Cassese, Antonio, "On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosection and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law", EJIL, 9 (1998)
  66. Draper, G.I.A.D., "The Implementation and Enforcement of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Two Additional Protocols of 1978", RCADI, 164 (1979)
  67. Fuber, Max, "Die Kriegsrechtlichen Verträge und die Kriegsräison", Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht, 7 (1913)
  68. Nahlik, S. E., "Le problème des représailles a la lumière des travaux de la confèrence diplomatique sur le droit humanitaire", RGDIP, 82 (1978)
  69. Rowe, P,, "War Crimes and the Former Yugoslavia, the Legal Difficulties", Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, 32 (1993)
  70. Kawaka, E., "Belligerent Reprisals in the Law of Armed Conflicts", Stanford Journal of International Law, 27 (1990)
  71. Visscher, Ch. de, "Les Lois de la Guerre et la Théorie de la Nécessite", RGDIP, 24 (1917)
  72. "Rauter Case(the Netherlands Special Court of Cassation)", ILR, 16 (1995)
  73. McDougal, Myres S., "The Soviet - Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defence", AJIL, 59 (1963)
  74. Partsch, Karl Josef, "Reprisals", EPIL, 1 (1992)
  75. 학술지(정기간행물) 학술대회논문 단행본 보고서 학위논문 인터넷자원 기타자료 Kalshoven, F., "War, Law of", EPIL, 4 (2000)
  76. Kunz, Joseph L., "Plus de Lois de la Guerre?", RGDIP, 41
  77. Zemanek, K., "Legal Foundation of the International System", RCADI, 266 (1997)
  78. Riphagen, W., "Fourth Report on State Responsibility, YILC, 1983-Ⅱ pt.1", ~ (1983)
  79. Strupp, K., Strupp, "Les règles générales du droit de la paix", RCADI, 46 (1936)
  80. Cannizzaro, E., "The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasure", EJIL, 12 (2001)
  81. In re Kappler, "Italy, Military Tribunal of Rome, July 20, 1948", Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, 15 (1948)
  82. Prosecutor v. Kupreskic, "14 January 2000, Case No.IT-95-16-T (Trial Chamber)", ~ (2000)
  83. Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, "Department of Defence", ~ (1992)
  84. O' Brien, W. V., "Legitimate Military Necessity in Nuclear War", Word Polity Ⅱ, ~ (1960)
  85. "ICJ Reports 1996", ~ (1996)
  86. "AIDI. Tome 5(1588-1882)", ~
  87. "ICJ Advisory Opinion of July 2004", ILM, 34 (2004)
  89. "중앙일보, 2008년 12월 31일자 및 2009년 1월 19일자", ~

관련 논문AI추천

在外自國民保護를 위한 武力使用의 合法性－ 自國民生命保護를 中心으로 －노석태중앙법학회 · 중앙법학2005 · 제7권 제1호침략범죄의 정의에 있어서의 법적 쟁점최태현법학연구원 · 법학논총2006 · 제23권 제1호국제법상 핵사용의 규제성재호법학연구원 · 성균관법학2003 · 제15권 제2호국제법상 형평의 규범적 기능과 한계 - 재판 규범적 가치를 중심으로 -성재호, 이창렬법학연구원 · 성균관법학2009 · 제21권 제2호국제테러리즘과 국제법성재호법학연구원 · 성균관법학2002 · 제14권 제2호韓國 國際刑事司法의 主要問題조상제한국비교형사법학회 · 비교형사법연구2004 · 제6권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

Mediation im Verwaltungsverfahren- und VerwaltungsprozessRainer Pitschas, 김해룡, 최승필pp. 1-49유럽계약법에 있어서의 「의사의 하자」박영복pp. 51-90「Common Frame of Reference 초안」 중 채무의 불이행에 관한 규정의 고찰김영두pp. 91-141국제물품거래에서의 自助賣却 - 국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약(CISG) 제88조를 중심으로 -김진우pp. 145-169유럽서비스계약법원칙의 일반규정상 채무불이행책임박희호pp. 171-204
원문 보기