본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

구속기준의 객관화와 구속절차의 투명화

Objectification of the Standard of Detention and Transparency of Process of Detention.

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

To prevent the freedom of a citizen, The Warrant System enables the judiciary to control the abuse of warrant in investigation agency. But troubles have sharply arisen between the prosecution and the court about Request & Dismissal of Detention Warrant. These are owing to the various problems occurred in the course of operation of Warrant System. First, Investigation agency has arbitrarily applied the Standard of Detention to Request of Detention Warrant and misused human restriction for the benefit of investigation. Secondly, the court as detention warrant examination agency subjectively interpretations the Standard of Detention and does not present the possibility of presupposition to investigation agency. Also, it introduces peoples into confusion and anxiety. These consequences are that the Standard of Detention fundamentally lacks clearness and objectivity. Besides, It is responsible to the prosecution and court to make arbitrary use of the Standard of Detention. To solve the problems, first of all, We must make the Standard of Detention that people can understand. It is necessary to collect the widespread opinions from academic circles, the court, lawyers, and civil organiazation. The reasons of detention in Criminal Procedure Act should be objectified to make people understood. And they must be more embodied and more subdivided than the reasons of detention in Criminal Procedure Act. And some elements that is considered to decide detention should be demanded for superiority over other elements and measured. Besides, the unification of the Standards of Detention that the prosecution and court have used separately is needed. Secondly, we should clarify the procss of detention. That is, the prosecution and court should record the process of Request & Dismissal of Detention Warrant and a jury must plainly record the concrete cause of Dismissal of Detention Warrant. Thirdly, Complaint of Warrant should be introduced to make the standard of detention apparent by collecting cases of the supreme court. Above all, Detention Warrant System is operated not for the convenience of the prosecution and court but for the benefit of people as demander of judicial service. And We should make efforts to harmonize both value-the protection of the fundamental human rights and the safeguard of people from crimes-.

Abstract

To prevent the freedom of a citizen, The Warrant System enables the judiciary to control the abuse of warrant in investigation agency. But troubles have sharply arisen between the prosecution and the court about Request & Dismissal of Detention Warrant. These are owing to the various problems occurred in the course of operation of Warrant System. First, Investigation agency has arbitrarily applied the Standard of Detention to Request of Detention Warrant and misused human restriction for the benefit of investigation. Secondly, the court as detention warrant examination agency subjectively interpretations the Standard of Detention and does not present the possibility of presupposition to investigation agency. Also, it introduces peoples into confusion and anxiety. These consequences are that the Standard of Detention fundamentally lacks clearness and objectivity. Besides, It is responsible to the prosecution and court to make arbitrary use of the Standard of Detention. To solve the problems, first of all, We must make the Standard of Detention that people can understand. It is necessary to collect the widespread opinions from academic circles, the court, lawyers, and civil organiazation. The reasons of detention in Criminal Procedure Act should be objectified to make people understood. And they must be more embodied and more subdivided than the reasons of detention in Criminal Procedure Act. And some elements that is considered to decide detention should be demanded for superiority over other elements and measured. Besides, the unification of the Standards of Detention that the prosecution and court have used separately is needed. Secondly, we should clarify the procss of detention. That is, the prosecution and court should record the process of Request & Dismissal of Detention Warrant and a jury must plainly record the concrete cause of Dismissal of Detention Warrant. Thirdly, Complaint of Warrant should be introduced to make the standard of detention apparent by collecting cases of the supreme court. Above all, Detention Warrant System is operated not for the convenience of the prosecution and court but for the benefit of people as demander of judicial service. And We should make efforts to harmonize both value-the protection of the fundamental human rights and the safeguard of people from crimes-.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 대법원, "사법연감" (2009)
  2. 배종대, "형사소송법(제7판)" (2005), 홍문사
  3. 법무부, "개정 형사소송법", ~ (2007)
  4. "법률신문, 2007.10.29", ~ (2007)
  5. 신동운, "인신구속제도를 둘러싼 법적용의 왜곡과 그 해결방안", 서울대학교 법학 (1999), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  6. 이영란, "한국형사소송법(개정판)" (2008), 나남
  7. 이완규, "독일의 구속영장 심사와 우리나라 실무에의 시사점", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 7 (2007), 대검찰청 미래기획단
  8. 이재상, "신형사소송법(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
  9. 이종갑, "인신구속에 관한 연구", 법학연구 (2000), 경상대학교 법학연구소
  10. 임동규, "형사소송법(제5판)" (2008), 법문사
  11. "조선일보, 2009,05.11", ~ (2009)
  12. "조선일보, 2009.06.16", ~ (2009)
  13. 하태훈, "구속영장실질심사제도의 과제와 전망, 법률신문, 1997.02.27", ~ (1997)
  14. 21세기 형사사법개혁의 방향과 대국민 법률서비스 개선방안(Ⅳ) -수사 절차상 인권보호와 효율성제고, "한국형사정책연구원", ~ (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)