부동산 민간경매에 관한 연구
A Study on Real Estate Private Auction
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The essence of the civil execution such as judicial foreclosure is sales. But civil execution system, unlike the contract for sale, doesn't ensure the maximum benefit to the creditors and debtors, but realize creditor's claim fairly by force ensuring his second best interests. Therefore current civil execution system have limits immanently that lower efficiency and economics than contract for sale. Real estate private auction that came into being spontaneously by market is only at an early stage, that it lacks analysis on its legal relations, the right function and adverse effect, etc. Yet it has many merits, for example reduction of the period spent on transactions, guarantee of reasonable purchase price through competitive bidding, enhance the safety of transactions through rigorous analysis of the right. This article was examined in terms of two viewpoints about real estate private auction. The first is on its appropriateness and legal relations of contract of real estate private auction, the second is a review on the possibility of transfer contract of real estate private auction to parts of judicial foreclosure. Current contract of real estate private auction is taken effect only kinds of contract without basis of law. So I examined contract of real estate private auction by method of contract law, and proposed possibility of transfer real estate private auction to as a optional parts and preceding process of judicial foreclosure process. But, this article is only sketch on real estate private auction as a new system against traditional judicial foreclosure process. So, I think it's needed to be studied more detail and concretely about its systematization.
Abstract
The essence of the civil execution such as judicial foreclosure is sales. But civil execution system, unlike the contract for sale, doesn't ensure the maximum benefit to the creditors and debtors, but realize creditor's claim fairly by force ensuring his second best interests. Therefore current civil execution system have limits immanently that lower efficiency and economics than contract for sale. Real estate private auction that came into being spontaneously by market is only at an early stage, that it lacks analysis on its legal relations, the right function and adverse effect, etc. Yet it has many merits, for example reduction of the period spent on transactions, guarantee of reasonable purchase price through competitive bidding, enhance the safety of transactions through rigorous analysis of the right. This article was examined in terms of two viewpoints about real estate private auction. The first is on its appropriateness and legal relations of contract of real estate private auction, the second is a review on the possibility of transfer contract of real estate private auction to parts of judicial foreclosure. Current contract of real estate private auction is taken effect only kinds of contract without basis of law. So I examined contract of real estate private auction by method of contract law, and proposed possibility of transfer real estate private auction to as a optional parts and preceding process of judicial foreclosure process. But, this article is only sketch on real estate private auction as a new system against traditional judicial foreclosure process. So, I think it's needed to be studied more detail and concretely about its systematization.
참고문헌 (48)
- 강대성, "민사집행법(제4판)" (2008), 삼영사
- 고준석, "부동산경매 활성화를 위한 법제개선에 관한 연구" (2005), 동국대 대학원
- 곽용진, "공매와 경매의 이론과 실무" (2007), 법률문화원
- 김봉석, "법원경매 부동산의 권리분석과 배당 : 법원 경매와 한국자산관리공사의 공매 절차를 중심으로" (2005), 한국학술정보
- 오시영, "민사집행법" (2007), 학현사
- 윤 경, "민사집행(부동사경매)의 실무" (2008), 육법사
- 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2007), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (1999), 박영사
- 고형석, "통신판매중개자의 책임에 관한 연구", 법학논고, (32), pp.119~152 (2010), 법학연구원
- 김대명, "공인중개사법상 부동산중개계약에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (34), pp.413~442 (2009), 한국법학회
- 김상명, "부동산중개계약에 관한 연구(I)", 법학연구, 25 (2007)
- 김상수, "민사집행법의 시행과 부동산경매", 민사소송, 12(1), pp.329~356 (2008), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김상용, "강제경매와 민간경매의 통합", 고시계 (1990)
- 김상찬, "경매에서의 매도인의 담보책임", 법과 정책, 12(1) (2006), 제주대학교
- 김재훈, "부동산 경매에서 권리분석과 주택임차인의 지위", 법학연구, 13 (2005), 경상대 법학연구소
- 김천수, "일본의 부동산경매절차에 있어서 원활화ㆍ신속화등을 꾀하기 위한 새로운 제도", 민사재판의 제문제, 11 (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 남효순, "인터넷경매의 법률관계:Auction약관 및 esale약관을 중심으로" (2005), 법문사
- 민일영, "경매와 담보책임의 법리 - 임차주택의 경매를 중심으로 -", 법조, 53(1)통권 : 568, pp.5~30 (2004), 법조협회
- 박광동, "부동산민간경매제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 담보권실행으로서의 민간경매를 중심으로 -", 토지법학, 24(2), pp.117~140 (2008), 한국토지법학회
- 박정규, "부동산경매절차의 개선 및 권리분석상 명확성 확보방안" (2006), 충북대 대학원
- 백승재, "인터넷 경매의 법적 제문제 : 민사적 문제점에 관하여", 인터넷법률, (12) (2002), 법무부
- 오병철, "인터넷상의 특수한 매매계약", 민사법학, (21) (2002), 한국민사법학회
- 윤경, "부동산경매절차의 실무상 제문제", 재판자료, 112 (2007), 법원도서관
- 윤석찬, "인터넷경매에서의 철회권 인정여부에 관하여", 인터넷법률, 19 (2003), 법무부
- 윤석찬, "인터넷 경매에서의 契約締結과 消費者의 撤回權", 재산법연구, 20(2), pp.105~124 (2003), 한국재산법학회
- 윤창술, "인터넷경매에 대한 법적 고찰", 기업법연구, 19(4), pp.631~652 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 이병준, "인터넷 경매에서의 경매당사자와 경매업체의 계약책임", 외법논집 (2004), 한국외대 법학연구소
- 이태철, "부동산경매와 공매 절차의 경합에 따른 문제점의 개선에 관한 연구", 경성법학, 16(1) (2007), 경성대학교 법학연구소
- 이형규, "인터넷 경매업자의 법적 지위와 권리 및 의무", 비교사법, 10(2), pp.393~420 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 정지태, "부동산경매제도의 개선책에 관한 연구:경매절차를 중심으로" (2002), 건국대 대학원
- 納土敏幸, "競賣不動産の賣却の促進について", 銀行法務21 (1998), 經濟法令硏究會
- 荒木新五, "競賣制度改正の問題点と實務への影響", 金融法務事情, pp.1534~ (1998), 金融財政事情硏究所
- 法務省, "競賣制度硏究會", 競賣制度硏究會報告書
- 福島隆司, "米國における不動産競賣の實務ㆍ市場の實態", pp.719~ (2001), 商事法務硏究會
- 原道子, "速く, たくさん, 高く", 競賣不動産は, 21(44), pp.577~ (2000), 經濟法令硏究會
- 日本評論社, "民事執行法 : 競賣手續円滑化法·特正競賣法に對應" (1999)
- 資産評價政策學會, "民間競賣の導入により金融․不動産市場の,健全化を(中間報告)", 日本不動産學會, pp.20~ (2007), 民間競賣硏究會
- 井下田英樹, "米國の競賣制度の特色とわが國の制度論への示唆", 商事法務硏究會, pp.751~ (2002)
- 中村眞貴子, "オークシヨンの社會史 : 人身賣買から繪畵取引まで" (1993), 高科書店
- Brian W, "Harvey, Auctions law and practice" (2006), Oxford Univ. press
- Fisch, "Lawyers on the Auction Blick Evaluating the Selection of Calss Counsel by Auction", Columbia law review, 102(3) (2002), Columbia Law Review Association
- James M, "Online Auction Fraud", Federal Communication Law Journal (2000)
- Spinder, "Internet-Auktionen" (2001), C.H.Beck
- Wolfsteiner, "Staudinger" (2002), BGB
- Eickmann, "Müchener Kommentar zum BGB" (2004), Bd.6, 4.Aufl