본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부동산경매에서 유치권의 한계에 관한 연구

A Study on the Limit of the Lien in Real Estate Auction

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

Because real estate auction has the advantage of buying real estate at the lower price than the present market price, a number of people have been involved in the auction for the purpose of buying their own private house or investment. But the general public involved in the real estate auction have difficulty analyzing the object of real estate for sale and further more have a harder time conduct its title analysis. Especially, the interested parties in real estate auction know that 'the buy shall take over the lien without putting restriction on the period of its establishment or the presence or absence of the opposing power'. And the lienor lowers the selling price by declaring the falsified and exaggerated lien or the lien without the opposing power by abusing it and delays the delivery of real estate, which inflicts much damage.Therefore, this study attempted to investigate the limit of effect of the seizure and mortgage of the lien in real estate auction and define its definition, thereby helping the interested parties make the title analysis and contributing to stabilizing real estate transactions through real estate auction.

Abstract

Because real estate auction has the advantage of buying real estate at the lower price than the present market price, a number of people have been involved in the auction for the purpose of buying their own private house or investment. But the general public involved in the real estate auction have difficulty analyzing the object of real estate for sale and further more have a harder time conduct its title analysis. Especially, the interested parties in real estate auction know that 'the buy shall take over the lien without putting restriction on the period of its establishment or the presence or absence of the opposing power'. And the lienor lowers the selling price by declaring the falsified and exaggerated lien or the lien without the opposing power by abusing it and delays the delivery of real estate, which inflicts much damage.Therefore, this study attempted to investigate the limit of effect of the seizure and mortgage of the lien in real estate auction and define its definition, thereby helping the interested parties make the title analysis and contributing to stabilizing real estate transactions through real estate auction.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "민사집행과 유치권", 36집 (2004), 법원행정처
  2. "신정 물권법" (2000), 박영사
  3. "담보물권제도의 과제" (1993), 한국사법행정학회
  4. "저당권의 본질과 가치권에 관한 연구", 건국대 학술지26집 1 (1982)
  5. "신고 경매실무요론" (1975), 한국사법행정학회
  6. "압류의 처분금지효에 저촉하여 취득한 유치권으로 경매절차의 매수인에게 대항할 수 있는지 여부" (2006), 광주지방법원
  7. "민사집행법해설-구 민사소송법(집행절차편) 개정부분" (2002), 법원행정처
  8. -부동산집행, , 2003, ~, pp.법원행정처
  9. "부동산의 압류ㆍ가압류 후에 설정된 담보물권의 효력과 배당우선순위" (1990), 법원행정처
  10. "경매개시결정의 효력", 재판자료35 (1987), 법원도서관 법원도서관
  11. "배당요구의 종기 결정과 관련된 우선채권자의 보호에 관한 문제점 고찰", 109집 (2006), 법원도서관
  12. "한국 저당권의 구조와 최근의 동향", (22) (2006), 한국토지법학회
  13. "유치권의 담보물권으로서의 성격 민사법학의 제문제" (1990), 박영사
  14. "유치권이 요구하는 점유의 정도", 8집 (1998)
  15. "담보물권의 성질 연구논집제20권" (1991), 이화여자대학교 대학원
  16. "가압류의 처분금지적 효력", 재판자료45 (1989), 법원도서관
  17. "留置權の硏究" (2001), 信山社
  18. "建築請負代金債權による敷地への留置權と抵當權(下)", (1447) (1996)
  19. "平成 11年度 主要民事判例解說", (1036) (2000)
  20. "建築請負業者の敷地についての商事留置權", (901) (1996)
  21. "建築請負工事代金についての不動産留置權と根抵當權" (1996)
  22. "不動産留置權と抵當權の優劣を決定する基準", (1437) (1995)
  23. "競合する抵當權と民事留置權の成立要件", (1657) (2002)
  24. "留置權槪念の再構成" (1998), 一粒社
  25. "대법원홈페이지http:"[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)