본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

양형자료의 조사와 평가

Investigation and Estimation of Sentencing Data

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Sentencing Guideline System was introduced to correct the imbalance of sentencing. In order to bringing Sentencing Guideline System to success, Sentencing Investigation is necessary. Sentencing investigation refers to the examination of a defendant’s background prior to sentencing. Sentencing Investigator gathers various kinds of information, including personal information and identifying data describing the defendant,a chronology of the current offense and circumstance surrounding it, a record of the defendant’s previous convictions, home life and family data, educational background, health history and current state of health,military service, religious affiliation, financial condition etc. All the data which come to the judge help him decide what an appropriate sentence will be. This Sentencing Investigation System was raised as a part of the judicial reform. Many debates on the system are focused upon the subject of sentencing investigation. But, it is important not who is investigating sentencing data but how to investigate and estimate sentencing data. How to investigate and estimate sentencing data follows. Because probation officer is more independent of Court and Prosecution than the officer of court, the probation officer must investigate sentencing data. The object of sentencing investigation should be all crime. The right to counsel be guaranteed to the defendant in the time of sentencing investigation. The defendant be permitted to raise objections to the investigated sentencing data. Sentencing hearing be not open to public.

Abstract

Sentencing Guideline System was introduced to correct the imbalance of sentencing. In order to bringing Sentencing Guideline System to success, Sentencing Investigation is necessary. Sentencing investigation refers to the examination of a defendant’s background prior to sentencing. Sentencing Investigator gathers various kinds of information, including personal information and identifying data describing the defendant,a chronology of the current offense and circumstance surrounding it, a record of the defendant’s previous convictions, home life and family data, educational background, health history and current state of health,military service, religious affiliation, financial condition etc. All the data which come to the judge help him decide what an appropriate sentence will be. This Sentencing Investigation System was raised as a part of the judicial reform. Many debates on the system are focused upon the subject of sentencing investigation. But, it is important not who is investigating sentencing data but how to investigate and estimate sentencing data. How to investigate and estimate sentencing data follows. Because probation officer is more independent of Court and Prosecution than the officer of court, the probation officer must investigate sentencing data. The object of sentencing investigation should be all crime. The right to counsel be guaranteed to the defendant in the time of sentencing investigation. The defendant be permitted to raise objections to the investigated sentencing data. Sentencing hearing be not open to public.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 권오걸, "영국양형제도의 분석과 국내도입의 문제점 검토", 형사정책연구, 19(4), pp.157~192 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  2. 김재봉, "양형자료조사에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.1~22 (2006), 법학연구소
  3. 김혜정, "성인에 대한 판결전조사제도의 필요성", 보호관찰, (2) (2002), 한국보호관찰학회
  4. 김혜정, "양형조사제도 도입과 양형데이터베이스 구축", 사법제도개혁추진위원회 양형제도 개선을 위한 제2차 전문가 토론회 (2005)
  5. 김혜정, "개정법률안에 도입된 양형자료조사제도에 관한 검토", 형사법연구, (26), pp.409~428 (2006), 한국형사법학회
  6. 서보학, "판결전조사제도의 성인범에 확대실시방안", 보호관찰, (4) (2004), 한국보호관찰학회
  7. 우리나라 양형현황에 관한 기초보고, "손철우", 양형위원회, ~, pp.양형위원회 전문위원 연구자료 1 (2008)
  8. 이상철, "일본의 판결전 조사제도 도입 시도 당시의 논의 내용 및 그 이후의 상황", 외국의 양형제도연구 (2003), 법원행정처
  9. 우리나라 양형관행의 일반적 문제점, "이주형", 양형위원회, ~, pp.양형위원회 전문위원 연구자료 2 (2008)
  10. 천진호, "양형기준제 시행의 문제점과 양형자료 조사제도 도입을 위한 제언", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.251~272 (2009), 한국형사법학회
  11. 최석윤, "양형조사법안에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.309~336 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  12. 최응렬, "判決前調査制度의 合理的 改善方案에 관한 硏究- 司法制度改革推進委員會 ‘量刑調査制度 導入 法案’을 중심으로 -", 矯正硏究, 33, pp.89~117 (2006), 한국교정학회
  13. 한영수, "양형자료조사제도의 도입과 양형데이터베이스 시스템의 구축", 사개추위 제1차 양형토론회 자료 (2006)
  14. 박상기, "형사정책(제10판)" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
  15. 김일수, "바람직한 양형조사제도 - 기관갈등의 분석과 출구 -" (2010), 세창출판사
  16. 바람직한 양형조사 주체 및 조사방식에 관한 연구-양형조사제도에 관한 비교법적 연구를 중심으로, "김일수", 대검찰청, ~ (2009)
  17. 법원행정처, "양형실무" (1999)
  18. 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2007), 박영사
  19. 양형의 합리화에 관한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", ~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)