합리적 양형을 위한 양형조사제도 활용성의 제고방안
Improvement plan for the utilization of a sentencing factor investigation system
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To determine the sentencing corresponding to a specific issue in the sentencing process, the subject for sentencing and the method for sentencing are required. In other words, it is necessary to make visible, sentencing factors(sentencing conditions),the individual and specific elements which should be considered when deciding the sentence, and the sentencing standards for evaluating and judging those elements. To eliminate the distrust of the existing sentencing and strengthen the reliability of the judiciary, in addition this necessity, the Supreme Court organized the committee of sentencing, and prepared the Sentencing guidelines (the 1st Sentencing guidelines) for some crimes. And then, it decided to gradually expand the preparation for the Sentencing guidelines for other crimes. Reviewing the sentencing factors suggested in above Sentencing guidelines has intensified the burden of judges for hearing sentencing. The court has reviewed the introduction of the sentencing factors investigation system. First of all, the Supreme Court appointed the 1st inspectors and distributed them into some courts. However, in the middle of the process of introducing sentencing factors investigation system, a problem relating to the redundancy with the presentence investigation system of a probation officer, investigating the data to judge the suitability of the existing community treatment, arose. I see that, in conclusion, the sentencing factors investigation is dualized into the existing presentence investigation system and the sentencing factors investigation by the court investigators. The study aims to review the utilization of sentencing factors investigation system for rational sentencing, through the review of the problems of the present sentencing factors investigation system and, in particular, the presence of the conflicts of dual sentencing factors investigation system, by considering the meaning and the necessity of the sentencing factors investigation system in the sentencing guidelines system.
Abstract
To determine the sentencing corresponding to a specific issue in the sentencing process, the subject for sentencing and the method for sentencing are required. In other words, it is necessary to make visible, sentencing factors(sentencing conditions),the individual and specific elements which should be considered when deciding the sentence, and the sentencing standards for evaluating and judging those elements. To eliminate the distrust of the existing sentencing and strengthen the reliability of the judiciary, in addition this necessity, the Supreme Court organized the committee of sentencing, and prepared the Sentencing guidelines (the 1st Sentencing guidelines) for some crimes. And then, it decided to gradually expand the preparation for the Sentencing guidelines for other crimes. Reviewing the sentencing factors suggested in above Sentencing guidelines has intensified the burden of judges for hearing sentencing. The court has reviewed the introduction of the sentencing factors investigation system. First of all, the Supreme Court appointed the 1st inspectors and distributed them into some courts. However, in the middle of the process of introducing sentencing factors investigation system, a problem relating to the redundancy with the presentence investigation system of a probation officer, investigating the data to judge the suitability of the existing community treatment, arose. I see that, in conclusion, the sentencing factors investigation is dualized into the existing presentence investigation system and the sentencing factors investigation by the court investigators. The study aims to review the utilization of sentencing factors investigation system for rational sentencing, through the review of the problems of the present sentencing factors investigation system and, in particular, the presence of the conflicts of dual sentencing factors investigation system, by considering the meaning and the necessity of the sentencing factors investigation system in the sentencing guidelines system.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김기두, "형사소송법(전정판)" (1987), 박영사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법(제2판)" (2009), 홍문사
- 백형구, "신형사소송법강의(8정판)" (2001), 박영사
- 신동운, "형사소송법(제4판)" (2008), 법문사
- 신양균, "형사소송법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 신현주, "형사소송법(신정 2판)" (2002), 박영사
- 이영란, "한국형사소송법" (2006)
- 이재상, "신형사소송법(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
- 임동규, "형사소송법(제2판)" (2003), 법문사
- 정성근, "제5판 형법총론" (2011), 삼영사
- 정영석, "형사소송법" (1994)
- 강남주, "현행 판결전조사제도에 관한 고찰", 사법논집, 36 (2003)
- 양형의 형벌이론적 기초 및 개별적 양형단계에 관한 고찰, "김영환", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 바람직한 양형조사 주체 및 조사방식에 관한 연구, "김일수", 대검찰청, ~ (2009)
- 김재봉, "형사소송법개정안의 양형자료조사제도에 대한 검토", 형사정책, 18(2), pp.213~236 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 김재희, "독립된 제재수단으로 사회봉사명령 활용의 제고방안", 홍익법학, 12(1), pp.429~451 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김현석, "양형기준 시행성과와 향후 과제", 형사정책연구, 21(2), pp.7~41 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김혜정, "사법개혁추진위원회의 양형제도개선안에 관한 검토", 영남법학, 11(2) (2005)
- 법무부, "보호관찰관의 판결전조사제도 성인까지 확대실시", 법무부보도자료, ~ (2008)
- 판결전조사 분석, "법무부", 법무부 보호국 관찰과, ~ (2006)
- 2010 판결전조사 성과분석, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2010)
- 서보학, "판결전조사제도의 성인범 확대실시방안", 보호관찰, (4) (2004)
- 송광섭, "바람직한 양형조사의 주체에 관한 논의사항", 형사법의 신동향, (30), pp.48~98 (2011), 대검찰청
- 신양균, "형사소송법 제·개정 자료집(하)" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이법호, "양형조사제도의 도입에 따른 입법적 검토", 형사정책연구소식, (95) (2006)
- 판결전조사제도의 유용성에 관한 고찰 - 보호관찰제도의 회고와 전망, "이형재", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1999)
- 장규원, "범죄피해자와 형사절차참여에 관한 고찰", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.87~104 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 장재영, "판결전조사 전문화 방안", 보호, 16 (2004), 법무부
- 천진호, "양형기준제 시행의 문제점과 양형자료 조사제도 도입을 위한 제언", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.251~272 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 판결전조사제도 - 보호관찰제도의 회고와 전망, "최석윤", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1999)
- 한영수, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 양형제도개선 전문가 토론회 자료" (2005)
- 최응렬, "判決前調査制度의 合理的 改善方案에 관한 硏究- 司法制度改革推進委員會 ‘量刑調査制度 導入 法案’을 중심으로 -", 矯正硏究, 33, pp.89~117 (2006), 한국교정학회
- Gerd Pfeiffer, "Strafprozessordnung : Kommentar, 5., neu bearbeitete Aufl" (2005), C.H. Beck
- Günter, Spendel, "Zur Lehre vom Strafmaß" (1954)
- Günter, Spendel, "die Begründung des richterlichen Strafmaßes" (1964), NJW
- Bruns, Hans-Jürgen, "Grundprobleme des Strafzumessungsrecht", ZStW, 94 (1982)
- Schünemann, Georg, "Plädoyer für eine neue Theorie der Strafzumessung, In Neuere Tendenzen der Kriminalpolitik" (1987)
- Spendel, Günter, "Zur Lehre vom Strafmaß" (1954)
- Spendel, Günter, "Die Begründung des richterlichen Strafmaßes" (1964), NJW
- Spendel, Günter, "Zur Entwicklung der Strafzumessungslehre", ZStW, 83 (1971)
- 城下裕二, "量刑基準の硏究" (2004), 成文堂
- 川崎一夫, "體系的量刑論" (1991), 成文堂
- 原田國男, "量刑判斷の實際" (2001), 現代法律出版