한스 켈젠의 法과 國家理論 - 켈젠의 스멘트의 統合理論에 대한 批判을 중심으로 -
Hans Kelsen’s Theory of Law and State - Focused on Kelsen’s Critical View of Smend’s Integration Theory(Integrationslehre) -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in this area that his theories have aroused passionate controversy. Among the early intellectual influences on Kelsen’s legal thought, Kant must be given first place, although it was Kantianism as renewed by Neo-Kantians like Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer. From Kant Kelsen acquired a deeply felt sense of the importance of methodological purity: according to his view, the method of cognition determines the objection of cognition. In the defining the meaning of law, Kelsen attempted to determine whether there is any one element common to all legal systems at all times and places and every level of cultural development. In his search for a conception of law that is based on scientific univerality rather than on political particularism. The constitutive element of law as a coercive social order is the norm or the rule that somebody ought to act in a prescribed way. The structure of the legal norm clearly shows its difference from the moral norm. The basic norm(Grundnorm) supplies the legal order with a principle of unity. The concept of basic norm led Kelsen to the dynamic view of the law as hierachically held together. Rudolf Smend developed his integration theories of constitutional law and the state in the light of sociological and mental scierntific method. Smend made struggle against the traditional theory of legal positivism. He rejected clearly Kelsen’s normativism. The state is seen by Smend a living sprirtual and political life reality, Smend asserted that the state is the process of social integration, the state develops through the dynamic relation of each individual citizen’s will with that of communty at large. The constitution is a legal order of the political life reality of the state. Kelsen is a critic of Smend. Kelsen’s work 'The State as Integration - a principle confrontation -'(Der Staat als Integration - eine prinzipielle Auseinandusetzung -) is a confrontation between his pure theory of law and Smend’s integration theory. In the light of his pure theory of law Kelsen rejected Smend’s legal theory. Kelsen’s critique of Smend’s theory is the main contents in this article. Smend’s ideas had a profound influence on jurists of constitutional law, notably Konrad Hesse.
Abstract
In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in this area that his theories have aroused passionate controversy. Among the early intellectual influences on Kelsen’s legal thought, Kant must be given first place, although it was Kantianism as renewed by Neo-Kantians like Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer. From Kant Kelsen acquired a deeply felt sense of the importance of methodological purity: according to his view, the method of cognition determines the objection of cognition. In the defining the meaning of law, Kelsen attempted to determine whether there is any one element common to all legal systems at all times and places and every level of cultural development. In his search for a conception of law that is based on scientific univerality rather than on political particularism. The constitutive element of law as a coercive social order is the norm or the rule that somebody ought to act in a prescribed way. The structure of the legal norm clearly shows its difference from the moral norm. The basic norm(Grundnorm) supplies the legal order with a principle of unity. The concept of basic norm led Kelsen to the dynamic view of the law as hierachically held together. Rudolf Smend developed his integration theories of constitutional law and the state in the light of sociological and mental scierntific method. Smend made struggle against the traditional theory of legal positivism. He rejected clearly Kelsen’s normativism. The state is seen by Smend a living sprirtual and political life reality, Smend asserted that the state is the process of social integration, the state develops through the dynamic relation of each individual citizen’s will with that of communty at large. The constitution is a legal order of the political life reality of the state. Kelsen is a critic of Smend. Kelsen’s work 'The State as Integration - a principle confrontation -'(Der Staat als Integration - eine prinzipielle Auseinandusetzung -) is a confrontation between his pure theory of law and Smend’s integration theory. In the light of his pure theory of law Kelsen rejected Smend’s legal theory. Kelsen’s critique of Smend’s theory is the main contents in this article. Smend’s ideas had a profound influence on jurists of constitutional law, notably Konrad Hesse.
참고문헌 (54)
- John Plamenatz, "Ideology", pp.29~ (1970), Pall Mall Press
- 김용규, "법사상사강의", pp.200~ (1995), 계명대 출판부
- 한스 켈젠, "통합으로서의 국가 - 하나의 원리적 대결 -" (1994), 법문사
- David L. Sills, "International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences", pp.362~ (1979), The Macmillan Company & The Free Press
- 라드브르흐, "법철학", pp.117~ (1979), 삼영사
- 최종고, "법사상사", pp.326~ (2002), 박영사
- 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(상)", pp.148~ (1983), 박영사
- H. Kelsen, "Die Grundlage der Naturrechtslehre, In Das Naturrecht in der politischen Theorie", pp.1~4 (1963)
- H. Kelsen, "Allgemeine Staatslehre", pp.14~ (1966), Berlin
- C. Schmitt, "Legalität und Legitimität, In Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze", pp.264~ (1973), Duncker & Humblot
- Schmitt, "Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens, Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt", pp.14~ (1934), Hamburg
- Joseph H. Kaiser, "Einige Umrisse des deutschen Staatsdenkens seit Weimar, In AöR(Bd. 108)", pp.12~ (1983), Tübingen
- 정영수, "Theodor Litt의 정치교육사상", 인하대 인문과학연구소 논문집, 15, pp.357~372 (1989)
- 호프만ㆍ뢰쉬, "독일문학사", pp.233~ (1994), 일신사
- R. Smend, "Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht", pp.484~ (1968), Duncker & Humblot
- 콘라드ㆍ헷세, "서독헌법원론", pp.40~ (1985), 삼영사
- 허영, "한국헌법론", pp.18~ (2007), 박영사
- R. Smend, "Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht, in: Staatliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufeätze, 2. Aufl", pp.142~170 (1968), Duncker & Humblot
- Smend, "Das Problem der Institutionen und der Staat, in: Staatliche Abhanlungen und andere Aufsätze", pp.516~
- Smend, "Verfassang und Verfassungsrecht", pp.164~165
- Laband, "Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches, 5. Aufl.", pp.18~
- Anschütz, "Die Verfassung des deutschen Reiches, 14. Aufl.", pp.77~ (1933), Erl. zu Art
- 서원우, "공법학연습", pp.347~
- G. Meyer, "Der Begriff des Gesetzes und die rechtliche Natur des Staatshaushalts", pp.15~
- 한태연, "헌법학", pp.72~ (1983), 법문사
- F. Neumann, "Der Funktionswandel des Gesetzes im Recht der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, In Demokratischer und autoritärer Staat", pp.13~ (1967), Europäische Verlagsanstalt
- "헌재 1996. 2. 16, 96헌가2, 96헌바13병합", ~ (1996)
- "헌재 2001l 2. 22, 99헌마613", ~ (2001)
- H. Heller, "Der Begriff des Gesetzes in der Reichsverfassung, In VVDStRL(Heft4)", pp.90~, De Gruyer
- J. Rousseau, "Contra Social, liv, Ⅱ chap. Ⅵ"
- H. Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 10. Aufl.", pp.58~, C. H. Beck
- 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)", pp.31~ (2007), 박영사
- 정하중, "행정법총론", pp.154~ (2005), 법문사
- 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ", pp.141~
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ", pp.132~
- R. Pound, "The Spirit of Common Law", pp.46~ (1925), Boston
- M. Weber, "Wirtschaft und Geselleschaft, 5. Aufl.", pp.174~ (1972), J. C. B. Mohr
- K. Hesse, "Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts, der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 8. Aufl.", pp.205~ (1975), C. F. Müller
- P. Häberle, "Öffentliche Interessen als juristisches Problem : Eine Analyse von Gesetzgebung und Rechtssprechung", pp.95~ (1970)
- K. Hesse, "Rechtsstaat im Verfassungssystem des Grundgesetzes, in: Staatsverfassung und Kirchenordnung, Festgabe für Rudolf Smend zum 80", pp.86~ (1962), Geburtstag
- Kelsen, "Was ist die Reine Rechtslehre, in: Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule, Bd. Ⅰ", pp.22~ (1968)
- 심헌섭, "켈젠법이론선집", pp.280~ (1990), 법문사
- 허영, "한국헌법론", pp.653~ (2007), 박영사
- Erhard Denninger, "Das Rechtsstaatsprinzip, in: Staatrecht 1, Rowoht Taschenbuch", pp.94~ (1973), Hamburg
- Otto Kimminich, "Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte", pp.456~457 (1970), Frankfurta. M
- H. J. Laski, "The Pluratistic State, in: Foundations of Sovereignty and other Essays", pp.232~ (1931), George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
- O. Kirchheimer, "Die Grenzen der Enteignung, in: Funktionen des Staates und Verfassung, 1. Aufl.", pp.256~ (1972), Frankfurt a. M.
- C. Schmitt, "Legalität und Legimität, in: Verfassungsrechtliche Aussätze, 2. Aufl.", pp.345~ (1973), Dunken & Hunblot
- 허영, "한국헌법론", pp.306~ (2007), 박영사
- H. Kelsen, "Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie, 2. Aufl.", pp.101~ (1963), Neudruck
- Kelsen, "Die philosophische Grundlagen der Naturrechtslehre und des Rechtspositivismus", pp.338~, Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule
- G. Winkler, "Sein und Sollen, Rechtstheorie(Zeitschrift für Logik, Methodenlehre und Soziologie des Rechts)", pp.252~ (1976)
- R. Zippelius, "Das Wesen des Rechts, 4. Aufl.", pp.1~ (1978), C. H. Beck
- 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(중)", pp.9~12