少額訴訟節次의 改善에 관한 小考
A few Thoughts on the Reformation in Small Claims Procedure
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Trial of Small Claims Act prescribes special cases of the Civil Procedure Act for the purpose of dealing with small civil claims rapidly by using simple procedures in district courts and their branch courts. For that purpose, there are some exceptions and they brought several problems with the fairness of the procedure. So we need to think about improving the procedure to fix the problems. We have to find the methods to enhance the fairness, enhancing the rapidness and the economical efficiency of procedure. First, the scope of the small claims is too wide and it needs to be narrow. Specifically it would be better not to exceed 10,000,000 won. Second, it could be the method to protect litigant's right to give judicial scriveners the limited right of representation for the small claims. Third, unifying the trial procedure and execution procedure could make to improve the efficiency of the procedure. Forth, we have to get the utmost out of electronic filing system for the low cost and the high efficiency.
Abstract
Trial of Small Claims Act prescribes special cases of the Civil Procedure Act for the purpose of dealing with small civil claims rapidly by using simple procedures in district courts and their branch courts. For that purpose, there are some exceptions and they brought several problems with the fairness of the procedure. So we need to think about improving the procedure to fix the problems. We have to find the methods to enhance the fairness, enhancing the rapidness and the economical efficiency of procedure. First, the scope of the small claims is too wide and it needs to be narrow. Specifically it would be better not to exceed 10,000,000 won. Second, it could be the method to protect litigant's right to give judicial scriveners the limited right of representation for the small claims. Third, unifying the trial procedure and execution procedure could make to improve the efficiency of the procedure. Forth, we have to get the utmost out of electronic filing system for the low cost and the high efficiency.
참고문헌 (35)
- "사법연감", 법원행정처, ~ (2008)
- "독촉절차에서의 전자문서 이용 등에 관한 법률" (2006)[URL]
- 김상영, "소액사건의 범위확대에 대한 비판적 고찰", 부산법조, (16) (1998)
- 김상영, "소액사건심판법의 제문제", 민사소송, 7(1), pp.180~ (2003)
- "한국통계연감", 통계청, ~ (2008)
- "소액사건심판법 제11조의2 제3항", ~
- 中島寬, "少額訴訟の實務: 少額訴訟10年を迎えての現狀と展望", pp.5~ (2008), 酒井書店
- 加藤新太郞, "簡裁民事事件の考え方と實務", pp.6~ (2005), 民事法硏究會
- 이남철, "소액사건 소송대리권에 관한 고찰", 소액소송대리 개혁입법 자료집Ⅱ, 80~ (2007)
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법. 제4판", pp.25~ (2008), 박영사
- "사법연감", 법원행정처, ~ (2008)
- 양병회, "소액사건 소송대리제도의 개선", 소액소송대리 개혁입법 자료집Ⅰ, 71~ (2007)
- 오용석, "소액사건과 관련된 문제에 관한 소고", 실무연구, Ⅳ, pp.421~ (2005)
- "사법연감", 법원행정처, ~ (2008)
- 법무사법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서, "민사소송법", ~ (2007)
- "각국의 변호사제도" (2001), 법무부
- 小林昭彦, "(注釋)司法書士法" (2007), テイハン
- "소액사건심판법 제8조 제1항", ~
- 엄덕수, "2007년도 법무사 업계의 개혁 방향", 법조, 56(1)통권 : 604, pp.86~123 (2007), 법조협회
- 이시윤, "민사소송법」제4판", pp.841~ (2008), 박영사
- 中野貞一郞, "民事執行法 增補新訂五版", pp.711~ (2006), 靑林書院
- "민사집행법 제167조의2 제1항", ~
- 松村和德, "民事執行·保全法槪論", pp.126~ (2008), 成文堂
- 강민구, "전자파일링에 관한 연구-21세기 정보화 시대에 있어서 법원업무자동화의 측면에서", 사법논집, 32, pp.440~ (2001)
- "디지털타임즈, 2003.1.3", ~ (2003)
- 2003년도 사법정보화촉진시행계획(안), "법원행정처", 12~ (2003)
- "법원행정처 보도자료(2004.6.)", ~ (2004)
- 전자법정의 실현에 관한 법적 조건과 전망에 관한 연구, 정보통신학술연구과제, "임상혁", 정보통신부, 29~ (2005)
- 笠原毅彦, "コート・テクノロジー-法のフォーラム", 法律時報, 76(3) (2004)
- 二一世紀の民事訴訟の構想硏究會, "二一世紀の民事訴訟", 判例タイムズ,1063號, ~ (2001)
- "E-Filing for the courts in Canada(an idea whose time has come)" (2002)[URL]