시·군법원에서의 소액사건처리절차 개선방안 (민사조정을 중심으로)
Small Claims Procedure Improvement Policy in the Municipal Court (Focused on Civil Mediation)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
We experience various big and small conflicts in life. The most effective way to solving these conflicts is through a peaceful agreement between the concerned parties, and when it was difficult to reach a solution through such agreement, we have relied on the traditional method of filing a lawsuit. Filing a lawsuit, however, posed a fundamental problem both time-wise and economically. Therefore, in the search for a more effective conflict resolution method, we discovered arbitration. Arbitration certainly is not the all-around means for conflict resolution, but compared to filing a lawsuit, it allows a faster and more economic solution to the conflict. The distinctive character and advantages of the arbitration system can be applied in the municipal courts focusing on small claim cases. The municipal court was introduced in our country on September 1, 1995. At that time, most small and medium-sized cities and district regions had only the circuit court and lacked courthouses. In order to address the inconvenience of the citizens living in these regions, the Supreme Court established permanent courthouses, also known as municipal courts. Accustomed to giving quick and simple trials rather than attending sufficiently to each individual case, however, the municipal courts managing the small claims cases ended up in supplying reasons for the inhabitants to distrust the judiciary. This paper examines the national court system and the small claims procedure at the municipal courts. Furthermore it proposes a policy that will enable the municipal court to improve its judicial service through effective management of small claims cases and to concurrently build the citizens’ trust in the judiciary.
참고문헌 (36)
- 구재군, "민사조정에 관한 연구: 민사조정법의 해석상문제점을 중심으로", 법학논총, 28 (2005), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 김도현, "민사조정제도의 법사회학적 연구", 사회과학논집, 13 (2001), 서경대학교 사회과학연구소
- 김상영, "소액사건심판법의 제문제", 민사소송, 7(1) (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 대법원, "법원의 새로운 소송절차", ~ (2001)
- 법무부, "각국의 국가송무제도 2", ~, pp.법무자료 제246집 (2004)
- 법원행정처, "사법연감", ~ (2008)
- 법원행정처, "시·군법원 업무편람", ~ (2001)
- 법원행정처, "조정실무", ~ (2002)
- 사법연구재단, "성년후견제도", 성년후견제도연구회, ~ (2007)
- 송상현, "민사조정제도의 이념적 배경과 각국의 실태" (2007), 박영사
- 오대성, "민사조정의 운영실태와 그 활성화방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.189~219 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 위성운, "캐나다의 형사사법제도 개관" (2004), 법무연수원
- 유병현, "법원외 분쟁조정위원회의 발전방향", 고려법학, (43) (2004), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 유병현, "ADR의 발전과 법원외 조정의 효력", 법조, 53(6), pp.27~72 (2004), 법조협회
- 이시윤, "소액사건심판법", 사법행정, 15(3) (1974)
- 이준상, "ADR 활성화를 위한 개선방안", 민사소송, 10(1), pp.240~287 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이현종, "당사자 본인소송에서 신모델의 시행경험과 효율적 운영방안", ~, pp.재판자료 104 : 2004
- 정선주, "조정제도 활성화를 위한 조정절차의 개선방안: 전자거래 분쟁조정절차를 중심으로", 서강법학연구, 7 (2005), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 정선주, "ADR통일절차법의 제정에 대한 연구", 민사소송, 11(1), pp.284~311 (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
- 정영수, "변론준비제도에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 주인, "민사조정의 활성화와 사적자치", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.613~630 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 함영주, "국민을 위한 사법과 민사조정", 안암법학, (15) (2002), 고려대학교
- 南敏文, "簡易裁判所の実情" (2005), テイハン
- 石崎實, "少額訴訟" (2005), テイハン
- 安達敬, "簡易裁判所の民事実務" (2005), テイハン
- 大阪地方裁判所簡易裁判所活性化硏究會, "大阪簡易裁判所少額訴訟集中係における-少額訴訟手続に関する実践的硏究報告" (2006), 判例タイムズ社
- 高橋宏志, "新しい簡易裁判所の民事司法サ―ビス" (2005), 判例時報社
- Coulson, R, "Professional Mediation of Civil Dispute", ~ (1984)
- Johnson, S. H, "The Integration of Non-Litigious Dispute Resolution Material in to the Five-Year Proverty Course" (1985), NIDS Series
- Kovach, K, "MEDIATION in a nutshell" (2003), West Group
- Levine, S., "Breaking Down Costs : What You Are Losing by Not Using ADR", Alternatives to the High Costs of Litig, 19 (2001)
- Twining, W, "Alternatives to What : Theories of Litigation, Procedure and Dispute Settlement in Anglo-American Jurisprudence Some Neglected Classics", Mod. L. Rev, 56 (1993)
- Ware, J. S, "Alternative Dispute Resolution" (2001), West Group
- 법률신문, "법률신문", 법률신문, ~ (2009)