중국 반독점법상 기업결함 심사에 관한 고찰
A Case Study on the Judgement on M&A under the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
China introduced the Anti-trust law of the People's Republic of China (Antitrust Law) in August 1, 2008. The law regulates collusion, misuse of market dominance, corporate ownership concentration (corporate merger), and exclusion as well as limits of competition stemming from misuse of administrative power. Since the implementation of the Antitrust Law, however, China’s State Council delayed legislation of detailed rules, leaving uncertainties over the law enforcement and application. Such circumstances may be unfavorable for Korean companies, which have close economic relationship with China. Accordingly, it is significantly meaningful to understand China’s Antitrust Law and its application. This thesis will study the corporate merger-related regulation, which is one of the subjects that the Antitrust Law pursues and is actually being executed. Countries that restrict monopoly ease uncertainties that exist in antitrust law by setting rules and guidelines. The thesis includes analysis of corporate merger-related regulations as well as the initial draft of guidelines for the regulations established by the executive authority (Ministry of Commerce). In addition, the thesis will help comprehensive understanding of China’s monopoly regulation by studying two cases released by the Ministry of Commerce. It is positive that the Ministry referred foreign countries’ competition laws for its initial draft of guidelines and fully accepted existing law theories. However, legislative inadequacy of criteria for judging competition restrictiveness of corporate mergers is pointed out as a problem to solve. Among the two cases revealed by the Ministry of Commerce, the case of Coca-Cola Company carries significant meaning, as it was the first company that was prohibited by the Ministry of Commerce from acquiring a local company, and the case enhanced effectiveness of the law. On the other hand, however, it also caused legal and social controversies because reasons for the prohibition were not explained enough and related figures were not provided. Difficulties will remain for the law enforcement and companies will still be in a whirl even after detailed enforcement regulations for corporate merger examination are promulgated. Since the implementation of the Antitrust Law, there have been voices that the Law should be supplemented in order to solve the issues, and the result will be a key to determine the success of corporate merger examinations and China’s antitrust policies.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김동훈, "중국 반독점법 초안의 특징", 경제법연구, 5(1) (2006), 한국경제법
- 곽 상 현, "기업결합과 관련시장의 획정", 저스티스, (93), pp.36~91 (2006), 한국법학원
- 김도현, "중국반독점법" (2009), 법문사
- 김원규, "공정거래법상 경쟁제한적 기업결합에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.469~499 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 권오승, "경제법" (2005), 법문사
- 박제현, "중국의 경영자집중(기업결합)제도 연구 :반독점심사를 중심으로", 경쟁저널, (142) (2009)
- 법제처, "중국 반독점법에 관한 연구", 법제처, ~ (2008)
- 신영수, "잠재적 경쟁이론의 내용과 실제 적용", 경쟁법연구, 10 (2004), 한국경쟁학회
- 이민호, "기업결합의 경쟁제한성 판단 및 시정조치에 관한 심결례", 경쟁법연구, 11 (2005)
- 정호열, "경제법" (2008), 박영사
- 정병덕, "혼합형 기업결합의 경쟁제한성 판단기준", 안암법학회, 21 (2005)
- 曹康泰, "中华人民共和国反垄断法解读" (2007), 中国法制出版社
- 陈玉祥, "经营者集中审查标准研究", 法制与经济, 185 (2008)
- 商务部条法司, "《中国反垄断法》理解与适用" (2007), 法律出版社
- 时建中, "反垄断法-法典释评与学理探源" (2008), 中国人民大学出版社
- 王晓晔, "中华人民共和国反垄断详解" (2008), 知识产权出版社
- 吴宏伟, "经济法(第二版)" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
- 徐猛洲, "税法原理" (2008), 中国人民大学出版社
- 张穹, "反垄断理论研究" (2007), 中国法制出版社
- 张正钊, "行政法与行政诉讼法" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
- 种明钊, "竞争法" (2008), 法律出版社
- Fang Xianmin, "An Introduction to merger control under China's Anti-Monopoly Law", Some Enforcement Issues of Chinese Antimonopoly Law, 한국경쟁법학회-서울대경쟁법센터, 2009.4.27 발표자료., ~ (2009)
- "ACCC assessment of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited's proposed acquisition of Berri Limited"[URL]
