망중립성의 공법적 기초-망중립성문제의 국가개입 근거 및 현행법상 문제점을 중심으로-
The Legal Basis of Net Neutrality in Public Law Kim
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a controversial issue over the net neutrality to support an open access platform which treats all datain public network without discrimination. However, the existing dispute focuses on only relevant technology andgain and loss of parties directly involved economically, while the internet can affect all people in all area. It seemshard to reach a compromise due to technological developments in information control and conflicts of thepersons’ interests. Therefore, we need to have a normative discussion over the net neutrality. The internet is a public tool for all people to use for their own innovation. And it plays a role as aninfrastructure in information-oriented society. The net neutrality principle, created naturally, is the foundation ofthe innovation and increases fundamental human rights. The net neutrality means that governments or ISPs must not violate people’s fundamental human rightsagainst blocking access or unreasonable discrimination in transmitting of senders-recipients, information(packet),device. The end-to-end principle of the network is a technological basis of neutrality. As possibility of technicalcontrol becomes strong, it needs to be revaluated by brand new measures, such as discrimination and efficiency. Neutral and open managements of the internet have leaded to the innovation and increased fundamentalhuman rights. Therefore, the problem we have is not a choice in whether the net is managed neutrally, but ratherit is a consideration of the regulation over the technology, affects innovation and fundamental human rights. Itshould be a reestablishment of fundamental human rights and a united legal system. The proper state intervention to the net neutrality principle is reasonable because innovation from belowimplies political-legal values, such as formation of the public opinion, participatory democracy and guarantee offundamental human rights. Specific and direct rules are not enough though current laws and regulations include rules over the netneutrality. We should make a general rule over the net neutrality not to make imperfect interpretations of newcoming problems.
Abstract
There is a controversial issue over the net neutrality to support an open access platform which treats all datain public network without discrimination. However, the existing dispute focuses on only relevant technology andgain and loss of parties directly involved economically, while the internet can affect all people in all area. It seemshard to reach a compromise due to technological developments in information control and conflicts of thepersons’ interests. Therefore, we need to have a normative discussion over the net neutrality. The internet is a public tool for all people to use for their own innovation. And it plays a role as aninfrastructure in information-oriented society. The net neutrality principle, created naturally, is the foundation ofthe innovation and increases fundamental human rights. The net neutrality means that governments or ISPs must not violate people’s fundamental human rightsagainst blocking access or unreasonable discrimination in transmitting of senders-recipients, information(packet),device. The end-to-end principle of the network is a technological basis of neutrality. As possibility of technicalcontrol becomes strong, it needs to be revaluated by brand new measures, such as discrimination and efficiency. Neutral and open managements of the internet have leaded to the innovation and increased fundamentalhuman rights. Therefore, the problem we have is not a choice in whether the net is managed neutrally, but ratherit is a consideration of the regulation over the technology, affects innovation and fundamental human rights. Itshould be a reestablishment of fundamental human rights and a united legal system. The proper state intervention to the net neutrality principle is reasonable because innovation from belowimplies political-legal values, such as formation of the public opinion, participatory democracy and guarantee offundamental human rights. Specific and direct rules are not enough though current laws and regulations include rules over the netneutrality. We should make a general rule over the net neutrality not to make imperfect interpretations of newcoming problems.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강경근, "情報保護의 憲法規範的 接近과 展望", 공법학연구, 6(2), pp.203~223 (2005), 한국비교공법학회
- 강휘원, "자율규제적 인터넷 거버넌스 : 설계와 정책적 함의", 한국행정학보, 36(3), pp.185~205 (2002), 한국행정학회
- 김도훈, "독점적 망사업자에 대한 망중립성 정책의 타당성 분석: 양면시장 관점에서 본 망중립성 이슈", 정보통신정책연구, 16(2), pp.1~45 (2009), 정보통신정책학회
- 김민기, "인터넷의 공공성과‘악플’에 대한 대처 방안에 관한 연구", 정치커뮤니케이션연구, (9), pp.5~50 (2008), 한국정치커뮤니케이션학회
- 양면시장(two-sided market) 이론에 따른 방송통신 서비스 정책 이슈 연구, "김성환", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.정보통신정책연구원 기본연구 08-11 (2008)
- 김수갑, "인체 생명공학의 발전에 따른 공법상의문제점", Juris Forum, (창간) (1998), 충북대 법학연구소
- 김창규, "인터넷포털의 디지털콘텐츠 공정거래 및 산업활성화 법제방안", 한양법학, (31), pp.473~504 (2010), 한양법학회
- 김형성, "생명공학의 헌법적 가능성과 한계", 공법연구, 32(1), pp.7~7 (2003), 한국공법학회
- 통신환경 변화에 따른 상호접속 대가산정 모형 및 정책방향 연구, "김희수", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.정보통신정책연구원 정책연구 10-10 (2010)
- 노혁준, "인간 복제의 법리 -헌법상 문제점과 입법론을 중심으로", 법조, (523) (2000)
- 문용갑, "인터넷 발전에 관한 일 연구: 비전과 행위자구성을 중심으로", 정보와 사회, (11) (2007)
- 문재완, "인터넷상의 명예훼손과 인터넷포털사이트의 법적 책임 - 대법원 2009. 4. 16. 선고 2008다53812 판결을 중심으로 -", 공법연구, 38(1), pp.53~85 (2009), 한국공법학회
- 朴 宣 映, "생명과학기술의 발전과 인간의 존엄- 생식체계(Reproduction System)에 관한 미국의 입법과 판례를 중심으로-", 미국헌법연구, 17(2), pp.165~214 (2006), 미국헌법학회
- 전기통신사업법상의 통신이용자보호및 통신사업자간 공정경쟁에 관한 연구, "박정훈", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (1998)
- 박준석, "온라인서비스제공자의 저작권 침해책임에 관한 한국에서의 입법 및 판례 분석", 창작과 권리, (63), pp.106~133 (2011), 세창출판사
- 변해철, "민영화와 공공의 이익", 공법연구 (1994)
- 서승우, "망중립성 규제정책의 과제", 전자통신동향분석, 22(6) (2007), 한국전자통신연구원
- 성준호, "인터넷포털 서비스 이용약관의 공정성문제에 관한 소고", 소비자문제연구, (39), pp.41~55 (2011), 한국소비자원
- 오경식, "저작권침해와 온라인서비스제공자의 형사책임", 형사정책, 21(2), pp.123~157 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
- 이봉의, "공정거래법상 필수설비법리의 현황과 과제", 상사판례연구, 19(1), pp.3~28 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 李元雨, "공기업 민영화와 공공성확보를 위한 제도개혁의 과제", 공법연구, 31(1), pp.2~2 (2002), 한국공법학회
- 이원우, "통신시장에 대한 공법적 규제의 구조와 문제점", 행정법연구, 11, pp.61~96 (2004), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 이희정, "네트워크 동등접근에 관한 一考: 도로법제로부터의 시사점", 경제규제와 법, 4(1), pp.58~75 (2011), 법학연구소
- 정영철, "인터넷접속서비스와 망중립성 －사업자권한과 국가권력간 균형을 중심으로－", 정보법학, 14(2), pp.133~164 (2010), 한국정보법학회
- 정완, "사이버상의 불법정보 유통에 대한 OSP의 책임", 형사정책연구, 16(1), pp.127~154 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 방송통신망 개방에 대한 해외사례 및정책연구-FTTH 등의 망개방 및 망중립성-, "정진한", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.정보통신정책연구원 정책연구09-25 (2009)
- 정찬모, "IPTV법상 설비동등제공과 필수설비이론 정비이론", 선진상사법률연구, (43), pp.1~20 (2008), 법무부
- 정태창, "롤즈의 공정으로서의 정의가 현대 입헌 민주주의의 위기에 대해 갖는 실천적 함의", 철학사상, (39), pp.167~198 (2011), 철학사상연구소
- 조한상, "헌법에 있어서 공공성의 의미", 공법학연구, 7(3), pp.251~276 (2006), 한국비교공법학회
- "‘網중립성’ 논쟁 뜨거워진다-통신사 “추가비용 내라”제조⋅인터넷사 “수용 못해” 평행선-" (2011)[URL]
- "평행선 달리는 ‘보톡’ 논란…요금구조 개편?-카카오 음성통화 대체 아니다 vs 이통사 매출감소⋅별정으로 규제-" (2012)[URL]
- "2013 한국인터넷백서"
- Farrell, Joseph, "Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age", Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 17(1) (2003)
- Marius Schwartz, "Introduction to a Special Issue on Network Neutrality, Review of Network Economics", REV NETW ECON, 8(1) (2009)
- "What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software" (2005)[URL]