본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Legal Duties and Tortious Liability of Third-Party E-Commerce Platforms

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

E-commerce is an important driver of the Chinese economy, with the motto “he who owns the platform owns the world” attesting to its importance. However, e-commerce platforms also pose unique legal challenges. In China, they are either third-party or self-trading, with elucidation of the former’s legal obligations and tortious liabilities being the concern of the present article. The treatment of e-commerce platforms has undergone a profound transformation in Chinese jurisprudence, with traditional counter-space rental and commission theory giving way to an independent legal status. With reference to the latest draft of the Chinese E-Commerce Law and key cases, this article offers an in-depth analysis of the legal obligations borne by third-party e-commerce platforms. These include: an ex ante duty of due diligence, duty to provide technical safeguards, promulgate fair trading rules, store information, supervise in the course of trading, protect user privacy and data, and respect the consumer’s right to be forgotten. These obligations balance the rights and interests of third-party e-commerce platforms, their users and society at large. Since e-commerce traders are able to exert a material influence on the rights and interests of users through advertisements, the reputation system and ranking, it is appropriate that they be stripped of technical neutrality in the transaction. Rather, in the event that their breach of legal obligations incurs tortious liability, it is only proper that they shoulder a commensurate burden in accordance with the principle that risk is consistent with responsibility. The ‘safe harbor’ and ‘red flag’ principles contained in Articles 36(2) and (3) of China’s Tort Liability Law are instructive in imputing liability. Although third-party e-commerce platforms are currently governed through a patchwork of laws and regulations, the Chinese National Peoples’ Congress has nevertheless resolved to draft the specialist E-Commerce Law, acknowledging the industry’s legal importance. We should remain keenly attentive of legislative efforts, and see what specific provisions concerning third-party e-commerce platforms are made in the future E-Commerce Law.

Abstract

E-commerce is an important driver of the Chinese economy, with the motto “he who owns the platform owns the world” attesting to its importance. However, e-commerce platforms also pose unique legal challenges. In China, they are either third-party or self-trading, with elucidation of the former’s legal obligations and tortious liabilities being the concern of the present article. The treatment of e-commerce platforms has undergone a profound transformation in Chinese jurisprudence, with traditional counter-space rental and commission theory giving way to an independent legal status. With reference to the latest draft of the Chinese E-Commerce Law and key cases, this article offers an in-depth analysis of the legal obligations borne by third-party e-commerce platforms. These include: an ex ante duty of due diligence, duty to provide technical safeguards, promulgate fair trading rules, store information, supervise in the course of trading, protect user privacy and data, and respect the consumer’s right to be forgotten. These obligations balance the rights and interests of third-party e-commerce platforms, their users and society at large. Since e-commerce traders are able to exert a material influence on the rights and interests of users through advertisements, the reputation system and ranking, it is appropriate that they be stripped of technical neutrality in the transaction. Rather, in the event that their breach of legal obligations incurs tortious liability, it is only proper that they shoulder a commensurate burden in accordance with the principle that risk is consistent with responsibility. The ‘safe harbor’ and ‘red flag’ principles contained in Articles 36(2) and (3) of China’s Tort Liability Law are instructive in imputing liability. Although third-party e-commerce platforms are currently governed through a patchwork of laws and regulations, the Chinese National Peoples’ Congress has nevertheless resolved to draft the specialist E-Commerce Law, acknowledging the industry’s legal importance. We should remain keenly attentive of legislative efforts, and see what specific provisions concerning third-party e-commerce platforms are made in the future E-Commerce Law.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Liu Deliang, "On the Status and Liability of Network Service Providers in Tort Law", Studies in Law and Business, 2001(5)
  2. See Su Tian, "On the Civil Liability of Network Trade Platform Providers", Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, (4) (2005)
  3. Liu Deliang, "Exploring the Status and Liability of Websites in E-Transactions", Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (5) (2005)
  4. Civil Law Office, "Legal Committee of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress “An Anthology of Legislative Backgrounds and Perspectives for the Consumer Rights and Interests Protection Law”", (2013, Law Press) at 255-256, ~ (2013)
  5. Gao Fuping, "Network and Society: Challenges and Legislative Policy Choices-A Study Report on E-Commerce Legislation", (2004, Law Press) at 106, ~ (2004)
  6. Liu Binbin, "Studies on Principal Legal Problems in E-Commerce Transactions", (2013, China Social Sciences Press) at 110, ~ (2013)
  7. Wu Xiangui, "The Legal Status of E-Commerce Trade Platforms", Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (6) (2008)
  8. Zhang Aidong, "Determining Legal Liability for Network Service Providers", Shandong Judgment, (5) (2005)
  9. Han Hongjin, "Locating E-Commerce Platform Providers in the Law", Contemporary Law Review, (2) (2009)
  10. Qi Aimin, "On Security Obligations Between and Among Providers of E-Commerce Platforms", Science of Law, (5) (2011)
  11. Liang Jiawei, "A Study on the Tortious Liability of E-Commerce Platform Providers for Aiding and Abetting-With a Comparative Survey of 25 Classic Cases from the Shanghai Courts", Intellectual Property Studies, (2) (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)