본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

ASEM 7 and developments of its socio-cultural dimension

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

ASEM has been a successful interregional cooperation body since 1996. After the demise of the Cold War, the European Union established a New Asian Strategy and Asia wanted to extend her diplomatic horizon to other areas of the world. ASEM adopted, from the very beginning, so called, three pillar system, made up of political, economic and socio-cultural dimension, This study emphasized on the socio-cultural aspects of the interregionalism. In fact ASEF and ASEM Duo have been quite successful up to now, providing venue for intercultural understanding. Although ASEM has been criticized under the name of informality and openness and therefore lack of robust institutional setting, this study looks longer term perspective in interregional cooperation. And socio-cultural programs can contribute significantly to the better relations of the bilateral ties with Erasmus Mundus, ICI-ECP etc. ASEM 7 also advised to continue further intercultural and interfaith dialogues between the two regions.

Abstract

ASEM has been a successful interregional cooperation body since 1996. After the demise of the Cold War, the European Union established a New Asian Strategy and Asia wanted to extend her diplomatic horizon to other areas of the world. ASEM adopted, from the very beginning, so called, three pillar system, made up of political, economic and socio-cultural dimension, This study emphasized on the socio-cultural aspects of the interregionalism. In fact ASEF and ASEM Duo have been quite successful up to now, providing venue for intercultural understanding. Although ASEM has been criticized under the name of informality and openness and therefore lack of robust institutional setting, this study looks longer term perspective in interregional cooperation. And socio-cultural programs can contribute significantly to the better relations of the bilateral ties with Erasmus Mundus, ICI-ECP etc. ASEM 7 also advised to continue further intercultural and interfaith dialogues between the two regions.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Chair’s Statement of the Seventh Asia-Europe Meeting", ~ (2008)
  2. Choi, Jinwoo, "7th ASEM Summit and Global Financial Crisis", Circumstances and Policy, 통권 : 11, pp.11~13 (2008)
  3. Structuring accountability: non-governmental participation in the Asia-Europe Meeting, "Gilson, Julie", ~, pp.CSGR Working Paper Series 233 (2010), 07
  4. Gilson, Julie, "New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia", European Integration, 27(3), pp.315~316 (2005)
  5. Kim, Heungchong, "Ten Years of ASEM and Korea’s Role: a Retrospective Assessment", Journal of European Studies, 10(2), pp.167~189 (2005)
  6. Si Hong Kim, "EU's External Relations with South East Asia", International Area Studies Review, 10(2), pp.39~52 (2007), 국제지역연구센터
  7. MOFAT, "Asia-Europe Meeting", ~ (2008)
  8. 박선희, "아셈(ASEM)의 세 번째 기둥과 문화협력", 한국프랑스학논집, 66, pp.343~360 (2009), 한국프랑스학회
  9. Reiterer, Michael, "Fostering a multipolar world order through inter-regional cooperations", Asia Europe Journal, 7(1), pp.179~196 (2009)
  10. University of Helsinki Network for European Studies, "ASEM in its Tenth Year, Looking Back, Looking Forward. An evaluation of ASEM in its first decade and an exploration of its future possibilities" (2006)
  11. Zhang, Jun, "EU in ASEM: its role in framing inter-regional cooperation with East Asian countries", Asia Europe Journal, 6(3), pp.487~505 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)