본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

East Asia and Europe Compared: Regionalism in Flux

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

Comparative regionalism has recently become a fancy area of study in international relations. This research presents an analysis of European experiences and possibilities of Asian regionalism. Europe launched an ambitious project, named European Community building in 1957 to prevent further conflicts on the continent and to restore economic prosperity. After over 50 years of integration history, European Union is considered as a best example of any regionalism, in particular way with limited sovereignty pooling and many scholars are eager to compare its applicability to other regions in the world. East Asia entails a delicate issue of identity, therefore definition of region in itself. Nevertheless ASEAN + 3 has been partly successful in that it made possible the creation of multilateral Chiang Mai Initiative to the financial crisis in the region. In terms of security and other related matters, it is preferable to take a form of open regionalism, inviting USA and others who have strategic interests over East Asia. But as to the economic cooperation, deepening-first-then-the-enlargement approach is desirable to yield coherent, durable, efficient and constructive cooperation. To attain these dualistic goals, institutionalization processes are urgently needed in the years to come.

Abstract

Comparative regionalism has recently become a fancy area of study in international relations. This research presents an analysis of European experiences and possibilities of Asian regionalism. Europe launched an ambitious project, named European Community building in 1957 to prevent further conflicts on the continent and to restore economic prosperity. After over 50 years of integration history, European Union is considered as a best example of any regionalism, in particular way with limited sovereignty pooling and many scholars are eager to compare its applicability to other regions in the world. East Asia entails a delicate issue of identity, therefore definition of region in itself. Nevertheless ASEAN + 3 has been partly successful in that it made possible the creation of multilateral Chiang Mai Initiative to the financial crisis in the region. In terms of security and other related matters, it is preferable to take a form of open regionalism, inviting USA and others who have strategic interests over East Asia. But as to the economic cooperation, deepening-first-then-the-enlargement approach is desirable to yield coherent, durable, efficient and constructive cooperation. To attain these dualistic goals, institutionalization processes are urgently needed in the years to come.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Diplomatic Issues of Regional Cooperation for New Administration: The Planof New Asia Strategy, "Bae, K. C", ~, pp.IFANS Issue Paper, 05 (2008), 03[DOI]
  2. Sequencing Regionalism: Theory, European Practice and Lessons forAsia, "Baldwin, Richard", 80~, pp.ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 80 (2011)
  3. Beeson, M, "Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative historicalperspective", Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), pp.969~985 (2005)
  4. Berkofsky, A., "Comparing EU and Asian Integration Processes – The EU a role modelfor Asia", EPC Issue Paper 23 (2005)
  5. Breslin, S., "Comparative Theory, China, and the Future of East Asian Regionalism", Paperpresented at the International Conference, Comparative Regionalism: Europe andEast Asia, Center for European Studies, Renmin University of China (2008)
  6. East Asian and European Economic Integration: AComparative Analysis, "Capannelli, G", 29~, pp.ADB Working Paper Series on Regional EconomicIntegration No 29 (2009)
  7. Egan, Michelle, "Research Agendas in EUStudies: Stalking the Elephant" (2010), palgrave macmillan
  8. EAC Forum, "East Asian Community and Korea’s Tomorrow: Beyond Northeast Asia,Toward East Asia" (2008), Imagine
  9. Greve, M. F, "ASEAN Down the ‘EU Way’", Cooperation and Conflict, 39(2), pp.207~212 (2004)
  10. Gilson, J, "New Regionalism? The EU and East Asia", Journal of European Integration, 27(5), pp.307~326 (2005)
  11. Henry, L, "The ASEAN Way and Community Integration: Two Different Models of Regionalism", European Law Journal, 13(6), pp.857~879 (2007)
  12. Hettne, B, "Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism", New Political Economy, 10(4), pp.543~571 (2005)
  13. Kim, Si Hong, "Identity Formation in Regionalism: A Comparison between East Asia andEurope", Paper presented at the International Conference, Comparative Regionalism:Europe and East Asia, Center for European Studies, Renmin University of China (2008)
  14. Si Hong Kim, "EU's External Relations with South East Asia", International Area Studies Review, 10(2), pp.39~52 (2007), 국제지역연구센터
  15. 김시홍, "EU Constitution and a Social Europe", 유럽연구, (22), pp.107~121 (2006), 한국유럽학회
  16. Korea-ASEAN Special Summit: Assessment and Perspective, "Lee, J. H", ~, pp.IFANS IssuePaper, 01 (2009), 07[DOI]
  17. Nassauer, H, "The European Union as a Model for ASEAN?, In ASEANand the European Union", pp.25~40 (2006), Konrad Adenauer Stiftung
  18. Noble, G. W., "Japanese and American Perspectives on East Asian Regionalism", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 8, pp.247~262 (2008)
  19. Park, J. C, "South Korea’s Northeast Asian Cooperation Initiative: Its theoretical Background and Framework" (2006), Oreum
  20. The ASEAN Economic Community and the European Experience, "Plummer, M. G", ~, pp.ADBWorking Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No 1 (2006)
  21. "Presidential Committee on Northeast Asian Cooperation Initiative", Implications of the European Integration to the Formation of Northeast Asian Community, ~ (2005)
  22. Roche, Maurice, "Exploring the Sociology of Europe. An Analysis of the European Social Complex" (2010), Sage
  23. Sakwa, Richard, "Contemporary Europe" (2006), palgravemacmillan
  24. The state of the art of regionalism: the past, present and future of adiscipline, "Tavares, Rodrigo", ~, pp.UNU-CRIS e-Working Paper (2004)
  25. Wang, Z, "Contending East Asian Regional Identity: Market-led, Institutions or SocialReconstruction", Paper presented at the International Conference, ComparativeRegionalism: Europe and East Asia, Center for European Studies, RenminUniversity of China (2008)
  26. "Theorizing Comparative Regionalization: Intradisciplinarity and theStudy of Regions in Europe, Asia and the Asia-pacific"[URL]
  27. Warleigh-Lack, A, "Towards a conceptual framework for regionalization: Bridging ‘new regionalism’and ‘integration theory’", Review of international Political Economy, 13(5), pp.750~771 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)