본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Tax Harmonization in the EU

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

The process of financial globalization propelled by information revolution and technology innovation has posed potential dangers to countries’ ability to pursue national tax regimes, thereby generating revenue losses and fiscal threats due to taxpayers’ shift in financial activities seeking cross-border tax arbitrage and lower tax jurisdictions. Fixing the ongoing financial crisis requires to rethink national tax regimes inconsistent with economic and political integration in the EU. That is, the EU needs independent resources, such as a common tax on financial transactions, a climate tax and project bond, to finance its growth plan. Although the interests and problems of the EU member countries may differ, proposals for tax harmonization in the area have been discussed for more than four decades. Arguably, some degree of direct tax harmonization is indispensable in the region to achieve the goal of the single market. This paper addresses the problems of tax scheme that arise because of economic integration, and examine the EU's efforts to achieve direct tax harmonization. To begin with, this paper provides an analysis of fiscal dilemma in the era of economic integration. In this context, this paper clarifies the concept of tax jurisdiction, and reviews problems with national tax systems such as double taxation, and taxpayers’ cross-border arbitrage resulting from the increased mobility of capital associated with financial globalization. Furthermore, special emphasis is given to discuss tax competition and harmonization. Then, it examines the role of EU institutions and soft law in direct tax harmonization. In that context, it also provides an analysis of tax cases and its appraisal. Finally, this paper conclude with a look into the future of the EU's efforts to achieve direct tax harmonization consistent with the economic integration in the area.

Abstract

The process of financial globalization propelled by information revolution and technology innovation has posed potential dangers to countries’ ability to pursue national tax regimes, thereby generating revenue losses and fiscal threats due to taxpayers’ shift in financial activities seeking cross-border tax arbitrage and lower tax jurisdictions. Fixing the ongoing financial crisis requires to rethink national tax regimes inconsistent with economic and political integration in the EU. That is, the EU needs independent resources, such as a common tax on financial transactions, a climate tax and project bond, to finance its growth plan. Although the interests and problems of the EU member countries may differ, proposals for tax harmonization in the area have been discussed for more than four decades. Arguably, some degree of direct tax harmonization is indispensable in the region to achieve the goal of the single market. This paper addresses the problems of tax scheme that arise because of economic integration, and examine the EU's efforts to achieve direct tax harmonization. To begin with, this paper provides an analysis of fiscal dilemma in the era of economic integration. In this context, this paper clarifies the concept of tax jurisdiction, and reviews problems with national tax systems such as double taxation, and taxpayers’ cross-border arbitrage resulting from the increased mobility of capital associated with financial globalization. Furthermore, special emphasis is given to discuss tax competition and harmonization. Then, it examines the role of EU institutions and soft law in direct tax harmonization. In that context, it also provides an analysis of tax cases and its appraisal. Finally, this paper conclude with a look into the future of the EU's efforts to achieve direct tax harmonization consistent with the economic integration in the area.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Avi-Yonah, Reuve, "Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State", Harv. L. Rev, 113, pp.1573~1676 (2000)
  2. Avi-Yonah, Reuve, "Commentary", Texas L. Rev, 53, pp.167~175 (2000)
  3. Bassinger, Frederick, "A Reference Guide to International Taxation" (1987), Lexington Press
  4. Borries, von Reimar, "Implementing the Subsidiarity Principle", Colum. J. Eur. L, 5, pp.143~ (1999)
  5. Brown, Karen, "Harmful Tax Competition: The OECD View", Geo. Wash. J. Int'l L. & Econ, 32, pp.311~323 (1999)
  6. Dagan, Tsilly, "The Tax Treaties Myth", N. Y. U. J. Int'l L. & Pol, 24, pp.939~996 (2000)
  7. Hines, James, "Lessons from Behavioral Responses to International Taxation", National Tax Journal, 52, pp.305~323 (1999)
  8. Hobbes, Thomas, "Liviathan", Cambridge University Press
  9. Kaye, Tracy, "Tax Discrimination: a Comparative Analysis of U.S. and EU Approaches", Fla. Tax Rev, 7, pp.47~53 (2005)
  10. Komaitis, Konstantinos, "Aristotle, Europe and Internet Governance", Pac. McGeo. Glob. Bus. & Dev. L. J, 21, pp.65~69 (2008)
  11. Littlewood, Michael, "Tax Competition: Harmful to Whom?", Mich. J. Int'l L, 26, pp.411~487 (2004)
  12. Martha, Rutsel, "The Jurisdiction to Tax in International Law: Theory and Practice of Legislative Fiscal Jurisdiction" (1989), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
  13. McLure, Jr. Charles, "Legislative, Judicial, Soft Law, and Cooperative Approaches to Corporate Income", J. Eur. L, 14, pp.380~ (2008)
  14. Melo, George, "Comment, Taxation in the Global Area: Preventing the Erosion of National Tax Bases or Impinging on Territorial Sovereignty?", Pace Int'l L. Rev, 12, pp.183~211 (1998)
  15. OECD, "Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issues" (1989), OECD
  16. Pak, In-Sop, "A Critique of Global Financial Governance and Some Proposals: Implications for East Asia", The J. Asian Stud, 11(2), pp.1~36 (2008)
  17. Pak, In-Sop, "Rethinking Global Tax Governance", Wonkwang L. Rev, 27(4), pp.379~402 (2011)
  18. Radaelli, Claudio, "The Code of Conduct Against Harmful Tax Competition: Open Method of Coordination in Disputes?", Admin, 81, pp.513~521 (2003)
  19. Roin, Julie, "Taxation without Coordination", J. Legal Stud, 31, pp.S61~S94 (2002)
  20. Rosenbloom, David, "International Tax Arbitrage and the International Tax System", Tax L. Rev, 6, pp.137~166 (2000)
  21. Ruding, Ohno, "Tax Harmonization in Europe: The Pros and Cons", Tax L. Rev, 54, pp.101~102 (2000)
  22. Shaviro, Daniel, "Money on the Table?: Responding to Cross-Border Tax Arbitrage", Chic. J. Int'l L, 3, pp.317~331 (2002)
  23. Smith, Adam, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (1925), Random House
  24. Snyder, Francis, "The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools, and Techniques", Mod. L. Rev, 56, pp.19~32 (1993)
  25. Tanzi, Vito, "Globalization, Technologic Developments, and the Work of Fiscal Termites", Brook. J. Int'l L, 26, pp.1261~1284 (2001)
  26. Utz, Stephen G, "Tax Harmonization and Coordination in Europe and America", Conn. J. Int'l L, 2, pp.767~795 (1994)
  27. Wilson, John, "Theories of Tax Competition", Nat'l Tax J, 52, pp.269~304 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)