본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Listening to Boredom in Heidegger

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

I begin with an introductory overview of Heidegger's early views on emotion and its role in Being and Time's project of giving an analytic of Dasein. Then, I turn to explicating his lengthy phenomenology of the fundamental attunement (Grundstimmung) of boredom (Langeweile) in what he claims to be its three forms - namely, as presented in his 1929-30 seminar The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. Specifically, I argue first that the activity of 'passing the time' (Zeitvertreib) he argues is constitutive of the first two forms represents a way in which boredom is most commonly a self-obscuring attunement. Second, I argue that the second form of boredom in particular can best be understood as the familiar phenomenon of 'zoning out'. Lastly, I argue that the third form of boredom, which Heidegger calls profound boredom (tiefe Langeweile), is best understood as a kind of meditative boredom, in which we no longer obscure boredom's revelatory power by passing the time. And, I offer the model of meditative practice as an instructive guide for interpreting Heidegger's claims about what profound boredom reveals to us.

Abstract

I begin with an introductory overview of Heidegger's early views on emotion and its role in Being and Time's project of giving an analytic of Dasein. Then, I turn to explicating his lengthy phenomenology of the fundamental attunement (Grundstimmung) of boredom (Langeweile) in what he claims to be its three forms - namely, as presented in his 1929-30 seminar The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. Specifically, I argue first that the activity of 'passing the time' (Zeitvertreib) he argues is constitutive of the first two forms represents a way in which boredom is most commonly a self-obscuring attunement. Second, I argue that the second form of boredom in particular can best be understood as the familiar phenomenon of 'zoning out'. Lastly, I argue that the third form of boredom, which Heidegger calls profound boredom (tiefe Langeweile), is best understood as a kind of meditative boredom, in which we no longer obscure boredom's revelatory power by passing the time. And, I offer the model of meditative practice as an instructive guide for interpreting Heidegger's claims about what profound boredom reveals to us.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 박민수, "하이데거 사상에서 미학과 예술", 인문과학, 91, pp.185~204 (2010), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  2. 송현아, "하이데거 철학에서 대화의 본질", 인문과학, 119, pp.165~190 (2020), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  3. 이은정, "예언자의 언어와 두 갈래의 시간 - 언어와 시간에 대한 하이데거와 레비나스의 사유", 인문과학, 95, pp.183~212 (2012), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  4. Boorstein, Sylvia, "Don't Just Do Something, Sit There: A Mindfulness Retreat" (1996), HarperCollins Publishers
  5. Haugeland, John, "Dasein Disclosed: John Haugalend’s Heidegger" (2013), Harvard University Press
  6. Elpidorou, Andreas, "Heidegger on Affect. Christos Hadjioannou", pp.177~204 (2019), Palgrave
  7. Heidegger, Martin, "Being and Time" (1965), Harper and Row
  8. Heidegger, Martin, "Country Path Conversations" (2010), University of Indiana Press
  9. Heidegger, Martin, "The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude" (1995), Indiana University Press
  10. 30), "Die Grundbegriff der Metaphysik: Welt - Endlichkeit – Einsamkeit (Gesaumtausgabe II: Abteilung: Vorlesungen 1923-1944, band 29", pp.1983, Heidegger, Martin
  11. Heidegger, Martin, "Sein und Zeit" (1967), Max Niemeyer Verlag Tübingen
  12. Pessoa, Fernando, "The Book of Disquiet: The Complete Edition" (2017), Serpent’s Tail
  13. Slaby, J., "Habitus in Habitat II – Other Sides of Cognition. Sabine Flach, Daniel Margulies and Jan Söffner", pp.101~120 (2010), Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
  14. Slaby, Jan, "Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy, vol. 2", pp.235~256 (2017), de Gruyter

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)