International Justice and South-North Korean Relations for Korean Unification
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to analyze from a perspective of international justice the characteristics of existing South-North Korean relations with an aim to explore better conditions for improving the inter-Korean relationship towards Korean unification. The South and North Korean relations have revolved around a vicious cycle of non-cooperative and antagonistic confrontation that resembles the prisoner’s dilemma. South and North Koreans share a historically developed common nationhood. However, this common national identity, overshadowed by the interests of each government in the South and the North, has failed to provide the common ground for South and North Korea to cooperate with each other. Furthermore, it has not contributed to constructing even a minimum public sphere where citizens of both sides can exercise public reason that begins with sharing political values and principles. Human rights, beginning with a minimalist approach, should be the political values that the South and the North commonly respect in regulating inter- Korean relations. With the gradual protection of human rights, the South and the North can begin to construct a minimal public sphere where citizens in South and North Korea exercise pubic reason concerning the issues of the South-North Korean relations and Korean unification, alongside guaranteeing the principle of non- aggression and expanding humanitarian assistance.
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyze from a perspective of international justice the characteristics of existing South-North Korean relations with an aim to explore better conditions for improving the inter-Korean relationship towards Korean unification. The South and North Korean relations have revolved around a vicious cycle of non-cooperative and antagonistic confrontation that resembles the prisoner’s dilemma. South and North Koreans share a historically developed common nationhood. However, this common national identity, overshadowed by the interests of each government in the South and the North, has failed to provide the common ground for South and North Korea to cooperate with each other. Furthermore, it has not contributed to constructing even a minimum public sphere where citizens of both sides can exercise public reason that begins with sharing political values and principles. Human rights, beginning with a minimalist approach, should be the political values that the South and the North commonly respect in regulating inter- Korean relations. With the gradual protection of human rights, the South and the North can begin to construct a minimal public sphere where citizens in South and North Korea exercise pubic reason concerning the issues of the South-North Korean relations and Korean unification, alongside guaranteeing the principle of non- aggression and expanding humanitarian assistance.
참고문헌 (27)
- Eric J. Ballbach, "North Korea's Emerging Nuclear State Identity: Discursive Construction and Performative Enactment", The Korean Journal of International Studies, 14(3), pp.391~414 (2016), 한국국제정치학회
- Baylis, John, "The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Constitution of the Republic of Korea, "Amended by Constitution No. 10", ~ (1987)
- 조성렬, "문재인 정부 대북정책의 과제와 전망: 한반도 비핵화와 평화체제의 비전을 중심으로", 통일정책연구, 26(1), pp.1~28 (2017), 통일연구원
- Choi, Wan-Kyu, "Twelve Questions on Making Korean Unification: Controversies and New Approaches", pp.21~42 (2015), Hanwul Academy
- Do, Kyung-ok, "Pathways to a Peaceful Korean Peninsula: Denuclearization, Reconciliation and Cooperation" (2016), Korea Institute for National Unification
- Féron, Henri, "Pathways to a Peaceful Korean Peninsula: Denuclearization, Reconciliation and Cooperation", pp.263~314 (2016), Korea Institute for National Unification
- Habermas, Jürgen, "Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy" (1998), The MIT Press
- Holzegrefe, J. L., "Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas", pp.15~52 (2003), Cambridge University Pres
- 제성호, "법적으로 본 남북 관계의 위상", 통일정책연구, 24(1), pp.89~115 (2015), 통일연구원
- 강동완, "북한으로의 외래문화 유입 현황과 실태-제3국에서의 북한주민 면접조사를 중심으로", 통일인문학, 60, pp.167~202 (2014), 인문학연구원
- 김지영, "국제사회의 대북 인도적 지원의 실제와 효과성:탈북민의 인식조사 결과를 중심으로", 한국동북아논총, 21(1), pp.87~103 (2016), 한국동북아학회
- Korea Institute for National Unification, "2017 White Paper on Human Rights in North Korea" (2017)
- "Korea JoonAng Daily (September 16-17, November 30, 2017)", ~ (2017)
- 이중구, "북한 핵증강론의 담론적 기원과 당론화 과정", 국제정치논총, 57(1), pp.155~201 (2017), 한국국제정치학회
- 민태은, "남남갈등과 인도적 대북지원", 의정연구, 22(3), pp.201~230 (2016), 한국의회발전연구회
- Paris, Roland, "The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention", International Peacekeeping, 21(5), pp.569~603 (2014)
- 박지연, "개성공단에서의 공동 거버넌스 연구: 모델의 구축과 함의를 중심으로", 통일정책연구, 25(2), pp.111~131 (2016), 통일연구원
- Rawls, John, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Rawls, John, "The Law of Peoples" (1999), Harvard University Press
- Rawls, John, "Political Liberalism" (2005), Columbia University Press
- Smith, Hazel, "North Korea: Markets and Military Rule" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- "Socialist Constitution of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea", Pyongyang, Korea, Juche 103, ~ (2014)
- "The Korean War Armistice Agreement", Panmunjom, Korea, July 27, 1953, ~ (1953)
- "United Nations Security Council Resolution 2375", ~ (2017)
- 황태희, "누가 북한을 이해하고 오해하는가? : 남·북한주민 인식조사 비교분석", 국제정치논총, 57(2), pp.243~289 (2017), 한국국제정치학회
- Yoon, Dae-Kyu, "The Constitution of North Korea: Its Changes and Implications", Fordham International Law Journal, 27, pp.1289~1305 (2003)