본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Nuclear Challenge in the Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, and Kim Jong Un Regime: Continuity and Dilemmas

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This essay examined how the ongoing logic of successive abandonment of hostile policies toward North Korea during the Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, and Kim Jong Un regimes has led to North Korea’s advancement in nuclear capabilities and how this trend has created dilemmas within the North Korean regime. The problem is that if North Korea does not get the new calculation method it aspires, it will have no choice but to pursue a military-first policy, focused on enhancing and accelerating nuclear and missile capabilities. This trend will ultimately increase the likelihood that, over time, North Korea will face regime endurance challenges, not from external threats but from the rising costs of controlling internal discontent. Eventually, the nuclear and military-first policies that have sustained three generations of hereditary dictatorships may become independent variables that facilitate the likelihood of regime change in North Korea by raising the cost of regime durability. Therefore, the direction of North Korean policy now needs to develop strategies that take advantage of the dilemma faced by the Kim Jong Un regime, focusing on the acceleration of the nuclear policy and the military-first policy.

Abstract

This essay examined how the ongoing logic of successive abandonment of hostile policies toward North Korea during the Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il, and Kim Jong Un regimes has led to North Korea’s advancement in nuclear capabilities and how this trend has created dilemmas within the North Korean regime. The problem is that if North Korea does not get the new calculation method it aspires, it will have no choice but to pursue a military-first policy, focused on enhancing and accelerating nuclear and missile capabilities. This trend will ultimately increase the likelihood that, over time, North Korea will face regime endurance challenges, not from external threats but from the rising costs of controlling internal discontent. Eventually, the nuclear and military-first policies that have sustained three generations of hereditary dictatorships may become independent variables that facilitate the likelihood of regime change in North Korea by raising the cost of regime durability. Therefore, the direction of North Korean policy now needs to develop strategies that take advantage of the dilemma faced by the Kim Jong Un regime, focusing on the acceleration of the nuclear policy and the military-first policy.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Alex Ward. Progressive Say Biden’s Foreign Policy Is the Same as The Trump’s, "They Are Wrong", Vox, April, 1 (2021)
  2. "Transformational Diplomacy" (2006)[URL]
  3. Disabling DPRK Nuclear Facilities, "David Albright", United States Institute of Peace, ~ (2007)
  4. "North Korea’s Withdrawal from Nonproliferation Treaty Official" (2023)[URL]
  5. Hecker, Siegfried S., "Hinge Point: An Inside Look at North Korea’s Nuclear Program" (2023), Stanford University Press
  6. Jong-Wook Chung, "Jong-Wook Chung’s Diplomatic Memoirs" (2019), Giffarang
  7. "Address to a Joint Session of Congress" (2021)[URL]
  8. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "U.S. Nonproliferation Policy: Lost Opportunities, with a Focus on North Korea", Ph.D., pp.2001
  9. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "Arms Control on the Korean Peninsula" (2004), Department of Defense
  10. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "Arms Control on the Korean Peninsula" (2007), Department of Defense
  11. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "The Biden Administration’s Security Strategy and North Korea Policy" (2022), Korea Nuclear Control Technology Institute
  12. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "Changes in North Korea’s Provocations and Inter-Korean Relations" (2018), Korea Institute for National Defense Studies
  13. Lee, Ho Ryoung, "Military Impact Assessment and Preparedness Study on the Declaration of the End of the Korean War" (2018), Korea Defense Research Institute
  14. Michell Reiss, "U.S. official urges N.Korea transform into ‘normal state’", Kyodo News International, ~ (2004)
  15. Sagan, Scott D., "Why do states build nuclear weapons?: Three models in search of a bomb", International Security, 21(3) (1996)
  16. Seo, Jaejin, "The 2.13 Agreement and the Establishment of a Peaceful Regime on the Korean Peninsula" (2007), Unification Research Institute
  17. "Tony Snow"[URL]
  18. "The Agreed Conclusion of the USA-DPRK New York Talks", ~ (1994)
  19. "The Statement by the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons", ~ (2003)
  20. "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)" (2023)[URL]
  21. National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2006, "White House", ~ (2006)
  22. William J. Perry, "Walking the Nuclear Line: The Memoirs of William Perry" (2016), Changbi
  23. "Rodong Sinmun", ~
  24. "Dong-A Ilbo", ~
  25. "Yonhap", ~
  26. "Korea Central News Agency", ~
  27. "JoongAng Ilbo", ~
  28. "Hankyoreh", ~
  29. "Korean Economy", ~
  30. "New York Times", ~
  31. "Washington Post", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)