포스트담론 이후 ‘청산’과 ‘지양’의 문제 : ‘총체성’과 ‘사물화’ 담론을 중심으로
The Problem of ‘Liquidation’ and ‘Aufhebung’ after Post-discourse: Focusing on the concepts of ‘Totalität’ and ‘Verdinglichung’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore alternative theories after post-discourse. In the West, postmodernism has been in full swing since the Revolution of 1968. It was both an expression of new sensibility and a criticism of Logocentrism and rationalism. The postmodernism, which began with the revolution in 1968, opposes the universalism centered on reason, and expresses a variety of sensibilities and desires. These include sex, religion, race, culture, art, etc. In short, postmodernism put multiplicity and pluralism as its first value. But the global economy is also more polarized after the post- discourse. After the grand discourse of Marxist materialism attacked by post-discourse disappeared, individuals are losing their freedom, not enjoying more freedom in the place. The governing methods of global capitalism in the 21st century are more subtle and thorough. Now it seems necessary to bring the concept of totality and objectification into people's memories. Of course, this evocation is based on the concept of dialectical Aufhebung. The significance of this paper is to bring back the concept of ‘Verdinglichung’ and ‘Totalität’ that has been forgotten from our consciousness into the field of the problem.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore alternative theories after post-discourse. In the West, postmodernism has been in full swing since the Revolution of 1968. It was both an expression of new sensibility and a criticism of Logocentrism and rationalism. The postmodernism, which began with the revolution in 1968, opposes the universalism centered on reason, and expresses a variety of sensibilities and desires. These include sex, religion, race, culture, art, etc. In short, postmodernism put multiplicity and pluralism as its first value. But the global economy is also more polarized after the post- discourse. After the grand discourse of Marxist materialism attacked by post-discourse disappeared, individuals are losing their freedom, not enjoying more freedom in the place. The governing methods of global capitalism in the 21st century are more subtle and thorough. Now it seems necessary to bring the concept of totality and objectification into people's memories. Of course, this evocation is based on the concept of dialectical Aufhebung. The significance of this paper is to bring back the concept of ‘Verdinglichung’ and ‘Totalität’ that has been forgotten from our consciousness into the field of the problem.
참고문헌 (48)
- 김정한, "한국에서 포스트맑스주의의 수용 과정과 쟁점들", 민족문화연구, (57), pp.57~90 (2012), 민족문화연구원
- 나병철, "포스트’시대를 넘어서, 해체론과 맑스주의", 문예미학회, pp.245~271 (1999)
- 변상출, "E. P. 톰슨 사상구조의 건축미학", 마르크스주의 연구, 12(3), pp.76~99 (2015), 사회과학연구원[DOI]
- 신영복, "담론" (2015), 돌베개
- 안성찬, "절반의 긍정 – 리오타르의 포스트모던론 해체론과 맑스주의", 문예미학회, pp.319~362 (1999)
- 양종근, "알튀세르의 맑스주의와 주체", 문예미학회, pp.141~158 (2002)
- 염무웅, "혼돈의 시대에 구상하는 문학의 논리" (1995), 창작과비평사
- 윤소영, "알튀세르를 다시 읽으며 ‘마르크스의 위기’를 생각한다", 이론, (여름), pp.41~62 (1992)
- 이명원, "문학의 탈정치화와 포스트 담론의 파장 - 민주화 이후 한국문학의 전개와 쇠락", 민족문화연구, (57), pp.121~151 (2012), 민족문화연구원
- 진명석, "지구화시대 맑스의 현재성", pp.213~225 (2003), 문화과학사
- 진태원, "‘포스트’ 담론의 유령들 - 애도의 애도를 위하여", 민족문화연구, (57), pp.5~55 (2012), 민족문화연구원
- 단테, 알리기에리, "신곡" (2005), 서해문집
- 월러스틴, "반체제운동" (1994), 창작과비평사
- 데리다, 자크, "그라마톨로지" (1996), 민음사
- 리오타르, 장 프랑수아, "포스트모던의 조건" (1992), 민음사
- 보르헤스, 호르헤 루이스, "불한당들의 세계사" (1994), 민음사
- 알튀세르, 루이, "철학에 대하여" (1997), 동문선
- 푸코, 미셀, "감시와 처벌" (1994), 나남
- 박구용, "도구적 이성 비판" (2006), 문예출판사
- 폴슨, 낸시 케이슨, "보르헤스와 거울의 유희" (2002), 태학사
- 지마, 페터. 모던, "포스트모던" (2010), 문학과 지성사
- Print. 지젝, "슬라보예. 멈춰라, 생각하라" (2012), 와이즈베리
- 이글턴, 테리, "미학사상" (1995), 한신문화사
- 아도르노, 테오도르, "문제는 리얼리즘이다" (1985), 실천문학사
- 테오도르 아도르노, "부정변증법" (1999), 한길사
- 아도르노, 테오도르, "변증법 입문" (2015), 세창출판사
- 바우만, 치머, "유동하는 공포" (2009), 웅진싱크빅
- Whitehead, A. North, "The Function Of Reason" (1958), Princeton UP
- Schmidt, Burghardt, "Postmoderne — Straregien des Vergessens" (1986), Luchterhand
- Friedell, Egon, "Kulturgeschichte der Neuzeit" (1960), C. H. Beck
- Thompson, E. Palmer, "The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays" (1978), Monthly Review Press
- Jameson, Frederic, "Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism", New Left Review, (146) (1984)
- Hegel, G. W. Friederich, "Phänomenologie des Geistes" (1970), Suhrkamp
- Schelling, F. W. Joseph, "Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 4" (1856), Metzler
- Lukács, Georg, "Problem des Realismus Ⅲ" (1965), Luchterhand
- Lukács, Georg, "Frühschriften Ⅱ" (1977), Luchterhand
- Lukács, Georg, "Die Zerstörung der Vernunft" (1981), Luchterhand
- Howe, Irving, "The Decline of The New" (1970), Harcourt
- Fetscher, Fetscher, "Zwischenbetrachtungen Im Prozeß der Aufklärung" (1989), Suhrkamp
- Kołakowski, Leszek, "Main Currents of Marxism" (1978), OUP
- Bachtin, Michael, "Die Ästhetik des Wortes" (1979), Suhrkamp
- Horkheimer, Max, "Wiesengrund. Dialektik der Aufklärung" (1971), Fischer
- Weber, Max, "Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre" (1922)
- Bürger, Peter, "Prosa der Moderne" (1992), Suhrkamp
- Adorno, Th, "Wiesengrund. Minima Moralia – Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben" (1980), Suhrkamp
- Adorno, Th, "Noten zur Literatur Ⅱ" (1961), Suhrkamp
- Welsch, Wolfgang, "Unsere postmoderne Moderne" (1991), VCH
- Žižek, Slavoj, "Die Tücke des Subjekts" (2001), Suhrkamp