『무정』의 전통성과 근대성 연구 - ‘권선징악’을 중심으로
A study on the Convention and Modernity of 『Heartlessness』 by Lee, Kwang-Soo
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Under the assumption that the concept of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil,’ which has frequently been employed throughout the history of Korean novels, could be useful in understanding history from the aspect of style, this study aims to verify the effectiveness of the concept as well as to prove that the method of analysis of novels. To that end, the usage of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’ was thoroughly reviewed and decided it should only refer to a narrative model of “hardship of the good is happiness while gaining power of the bad is destruction.” It means that the concept of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’ would be used only for the structural good and evil which exist in the deep-lying layer of stories. Also, in an effort to expose the aspects of such novels, many concepts were hired including ‘the ideology or value fundamental to the good and the bad,’ ‘the aspect of encouraging good,’ ‘the aspect of punishing evil,’ ‘the property of hardship,’ ‘the property of recovery,’ ‘the subject of punishing,’ and ‘the property of punishing.’This paper have selected 『Heartlessness』 by Lee, Kwang-Soo as an object to reveal ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’, as a Method of Researching the modern novels.
Abstract
Under the assumption that the concept of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil,’ which has frequently been employed throughout the history of Korean novels, could be useful in understanding history from the aspect of style, this study aims to verify the effectiveness of the concept as well as to prove that the method of analysis of novels. To that end, the usage of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’ was thoroughly reviewed and decided it should only refer to a narrative model of “hardship of the good is happiness while gaining power of the bad is destruction.” It means that the concept of ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’ would be used only for the structural good and evil which exist in the deep-lying layer of stories. Also, in an effort to expose the aspects of such novels, many concepts were hired including ‘the ideology or value fundamental to the good and the bad,’ ‘the aspect of encouraging good,’ ‘the aspect of punishing evil,’ ‘the property of hardship,’ ‘the property of recovery,’ ‘the subject of punishing,’ and ‘the property of punishing.’This paper have selected 『Heartlessness』 by Lee, Kwang-Soo as an object to reveal ‘Encouraging Good and Punishing Evil’, as a Method of Researching the modern novels.
참고문헌 (27)
- 문학사회학, "한국문학의 위상", pp.1991, 김현
- 김교봉, "근대전환기소설연구" (1991), 국학자료원
- 김구중, "『무정』의 근대성 연구", 어문학, (72), pp.95~120 (2001), 한국어문학회
- 김영찬, "식민지 근대의 내면과 표상", 상허학보, 16, pp.11~40 (2006), 상허학회
- 김윤식, "한국현대문학사" (1992), 서울대출판부
- 김윤식, "한국문학사" (1973), 민음사
- 김지영, "무정에 나타난 ‘사랑’과 ‘주체’의 근대성", 한국문학이론과 비평, 9(1), pp.79~110 (2005), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 김학면, "이광수 초기문학담론과 『무정』의 '근대성' 연구 -'문학' 개념의 확정, '주체'의 재구성, 감각의 '묘사'를 중심으로-", 한국현대문학연구, (25), pp.169~219 (2008), 한국현대문학회
- 김행숙, "이광수의 감정론", 상허학보, 33, pp.71~101 (2011), 상허학회
- 미케 발, "서사란 무엇인가" (1999), 문예출판사
- 박혜경, "<무정>의 계몽성과 근대성 再考", 국어국문학, 129, pp.1~20 (2001), 국어국문학회
- 볼프강 카이저, "언어예술작품론" (1999), 예림기획
- 사노 마사토, "이광수 소설에 나타난 시각성(視覺性)의 문제 : 근대문학의 시작과 ‘외부’적인 시선", 한국현대문학연구, (34), pp.105~125 (2011), 한국현대문학회
- 서영채, "텍스트의 귀환 : <무정>, <금색야차>, <적과 흑>을 통해 본 텍스트 생산의 주체와 연구의 윤리", 한국현대문학연구, (33), pp.5~34 (2011), 한국현대문학회
- 에리히 아우얼바하, "미메시스" (1987), 민음사
- 윤영옥, "<무정>에 나타난 서술 형식의 근대성과 사회적 의미", 한국현대문학연구, (13), pp.129~164 (2003), 한국현대문학회
- 윤흥로, "『무정』의 전통성과 근대성", 어문연구, 19(2), pp.173~190 (1991), 한국어문교육연구회
- 이재선, "한국현대소설사" (1979), 홍성사
- 정병설, "『무정(無情)』의 근대성과 정육(情育)", 한국문화, (54), pp.235~253 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원
- 조동일, "신소설의 문학사적 성격" (1983), 서울대출판부
- 조동일, "한국문학통사" (2005), 지식산업사
- 최시한, "가정소설연구" (1993), 민음사
- 김영희, "변증법적 문학이론의 전개" (1984), 창작과비평사
- 한용환, "소설학사전" (1999), 문예출판사
- 황종연, "노블, 청년, 제국", 상허학보, 14, pp.263~297 (2005), 상허학회
- F. K. 슈탄젤, "소설의 이론" (1994), 탑출판사
- S 채트먼, "영화와 소설의 서사구조" (1990), 민음사