본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상호매체성의 이론과 그 적용 - 피터 그리너웨이의 <프로스페로의 서재>를 중심으로-

A Theory of Intermediality and its Application in Peter Greenaway's <Prospero's Books>

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

The cinema of Peter Greenaway has consistently engaged questions of the relationship between the arts and particularly the relations of image and writing to cinema. When different types of images are correlated and merged with each other on the borders of painting, photography, film, video and computer animation, the interrelationships of the distinct elements cause a shift in the notion of the whole image. This analysis proposes to articulate the complex relationship between the ‘interartial’ dimension and the ‘intermedial’ dimension in Peter Greenaway's film, <Prospero's Books> (1991). If the interartiality is interested in the interaction between various arts, including the transition from one to another, the intermediality articulates the same type of relationship between two or more media. The interactional relationship is the same on both sides; on the contrary, the relationship between art and media does not show the same symmetry. All art is based on one or more media - the media is a condition existence of art - but no art can't be reduced to the status of media. This suggests that if the interartiality always involves the intermediality, this proposal may not be reversed. First, we analyse a self-conscious investigation into digital art and technology. Prosospero's Books can be read as a daring visual essay that self-consciously investigates the technical and philosophical functions of letters, books, images, animated paintings, digital arts, and the other magical illusions, which have been modern or will be post-modern media to represent the world. Greenaway uses both conventional film techniques and the resources of high-definition television to layer image upon image, superimposing a second or third frame within his frame. Greenaway uses the frame-within-frame as the cinematic equivalent of Shakespeare's paly-within-play : it offer him the possibility to analyse the work of art/artist/spectator relationship. Secondly, we analyse the relationship between the written word, oral word and the books. Like the written word, the oral word changes into a visual image: The linguistic richness and nuances of Shakeaspeare's characters turn into the powerful and authoritative, but monotone, voices of Gielgud-Prospero, who speaks the Shakespearean lines aloud, shaping the characters so powerfully through his worlds that they are conjured before us. Specially each book is placed over the frame of the play's action, only partially covering the image, so that it gives virtually every frame at least two space-time orientations. Thirdly, we try to show how Peter Greenaway uses pictorial references in order to illustrate the context of the Renaissance as well as pictorial techniques and language in order to question the nature of artistic representation. For exemple, The storm is visualised through reference to Botticelli's <Birth of Venus>: the storm of papers swirling around the library is constructed to look like a facsimili copy of Michelangelo's Laurentiana Library in Florence. Greenaway’s modern mannerism consists in imposing his own aesthetic vision and his questioning of art beyond the play’s meta-theatricality: in other words, Shakespeare’'s text has been adapted without being betrayed.

Abstract

The cinema of Peter Greenaway has consistently engaged questions of the relationship between the arts and particularly the relations of image and writing to cinema. When different types of images are correlated and merged with each other on the borders of painting, photography, film, video and computer animation, the interrelationships of the distinct elements cause a shift in the notion of the whole image. This analysis proposes to articulate the complex relationship between the ‘interartial’ dimension and the ‘intermedial’ dimension in Peter Greenaway's film, <Prospero's Books> (1991). If the interartiality is interested in the interaction between various arts, including the transition from one to another, the intermediality articulates the same type of relationship between two or more media. The interactional relationship is the same on both sides; on the contrary, the relationship between art and media does not show the same symmetry. All art is based on one or more media - the media is a condition existence of art - but no art can't be reduced to the status of media. This suggests that if the interartiality always involves the intermediality, this proposal may not be reversed. First, we analyse a self-conscious investigation into digital art and technology. Prosospero's Books can be read as a daring visual essay that self-consciously investigates the technical and philosophical functions of letters, books, images, animated paintings, digital arts, and the other magical illusions, which have been modern or will be post-modern media to represent the world. Greenaway uses both conventional film techniques and the resources of high-definition television to layer image upon image, superimposing a second or third frame within his frame. Greenaway uses the frame-within-frame as the cinematic equivalent of Shakespeare's paly-within-play : it offer him the possibility to analyse the work of art/artist/spectator relationship. Secondly, we analyse the relationship between the written word, oral word and the books. Like the written word, the oral word changes into a visual image: The linguistic richness and nuances of Shakeaspeare's characters turn into the powerful and authoritative, but monotone, voices of Gielgud-Prospero, who speaks the Shakespearean lines aloud, shaping the characters so powerfully through his worlds that they are conjured before us. Specially each book is placed over the frame of the play's action, only partially covering the image, so that it gives virtually every frame at least two space-time orientations. Thirdly, we try to show how Peter Greenaway uses pictorial references in order to illustrate the context of the Renaissance as well as pictorial techniques and language in order to question the nature of artistic representation. For exemple, The storm is visualised through reference to Botticelli's <Birth of Venus>: the storm of papers swirling around the library is constructed to look like a facsimili copy of Michelangelo's Laurentiana Library in Florence. Greenaway’s modern mannerism consists in imposing his own aesthetic vision and his questioning of art beyond the play’s meta-theatricality: in other words, Shakespeare’'s text has been adapted without being betrayed.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 고위공, "문학과 미술의 만남" (2004), 미술문화
  2. 고위공, "텍스트와 형상" (2005), 미술문화
  3. 권혜경, "셰익스피어 비틀기와 뒤집기: 영화 <리차드 3세>와 <프로스페로의 책>을 중심으로?", Shakespeare Review, 38(4), pp.843~876 (2002), 한국셰익스피어학회
  4. 기 드보르, "스텍터클의 사회" (1996), 현실문화연구
  5. 김경희, "피터 그리너웨이의 영화에 나타난 텍스트와 이미지", 뷔히너와 현대문학, 28, pp.305~320 (2007), 한국뷔히너학회
  6. 레프 마노비치, "뉴미디어의 언어" (2004), 생각의 나무
  7. 발터 벤야민, "독일 비애극의 원천" (2009), 한길사
  8. 윌리엄 셰익스피어, "폭풍우" (2008), 아침이슬
  9. 이희원, "디지털 시대의 셰익스피어 ―?프로스페로의 책?에 나타난 영상 마술과 테크노 권력의 역학관계", 고전 르네상스 영문학, 11(2), pp.3~80 (2002), 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회
  10. 진중권, "디지털로 부활한 셰익스피어, in : 필름 셰익스피어" (2005), 씨네 이십일
  11. 질 들뢰즈, "주름, 라이프니츠와 바로크" (2004), 문학과지성사
  12. 최정은, "보이지 않는 것과 말할 수 없는 것" (2000), 한길아트
  13. 피종호, "예술형식의 상호매체성", 독일문학, 41(4) (2000)
  14. 홍가이, "21세기 멀티미디어, 새로운 르네상스를 위하여", 월간미술 (1999)
  15. BAILLON, Jean-François, "Peter Greenaway: Cinéma contre nature" (1992), Revue de la Societe d'Etudes Anglaises Contemporaines
  16. BERTHIN-SCAILLET, Agnès, "Peter Greenaway : Théâtralité de cinéma, in : Cinéma et théâtralité" (1994), Aléas
  17. CAVECCHI, Mariacristina, "Peter Greenaway's Prospero's Books: A Tempest between Word and Image", Literature, 1997, pp.25(2), ~
  18. CIEUTAT Michel, "Peter Greenaway et l'infographie" (1997), Positif
  19. CIEUTAT Michel, "Jean-Louis, Le grand atelier de Peter Greenaway" (1998), Les Presses du réel
  20. CIMENT,Michel, "Entretien avec Peter Greenaway", Positif n°, 320 (1987)
  21. CIMENT,Michel, "La Configuration de l'art", Positif, N°, 368 (1991)
  22. COSTANTINI-CORNEDE, "De La Tempête à Prospero’'s Books: vertige des sens et fragmentation du sens, in : Shakespeare et le cinéma" (1998), U Paul Valéry
  23. COSTANTINI-CORNEDE, "Pictorialité et pictorialisme dans Prospero’s Books de Peter Greenaway", Etudes anglaises, 55(2) (2002)
  24. CUROT, Frank, "Singularisation par la pluralité: Le Style filmique de Peter Greenaway, in : Styles filmiques" (2000), Minard
  25. DUBOIS,Claude-Gilbert, "Le maniérisme" (1979), Presses universitaires de France
  26. GOYER, Nicolas, "Résurgences baroques. Les trajectoires d’'un parcours transculturel" (2001), La Lettre Volée
  27. GRAS, Vernon, "Dramatizing the Failure to Jump the Culture", Nature Gap: The Films of Peter Greenaway, 1995, pp.26(1), ~
  28. GRAS,Vernon, "Peter Greenaway : Interviews" (2000), University Press of Mississippi
  29. GREENAWAY, Peter, "Papers, Papiers" (1990), Dis Voir
  30. GREENAWAY, Peter, "Prospero’s Books : A Film of Shakespeare’s The Tempest" (1991), Chatto and Windus
  31. GREENAWAY,Peter, "Notes de travail pour Les Livres de Prospero", Positif, n°, (363) (1991)
  32. LAWRENCE, Amy, "The Films of Peter Greenaway" (1997), Cambridge UP
  33. MACIEL, Maria Esther, "Peter Greenaway's Encyclopaedism", Culture & Society, 23(4) (2006)
  34. MCKEE, Alexander, "Jonson vs. Jones in Prospero's Books", Literature, 2007, pp.35(2), ~
  35. MOSER,Walter, "‘Puissance baroque’ dans les nouveaux médias. A propos de Prospero’s Books de Peter Greenaway", Cinémas X, 2(3) (2000)
  36. MURRAY, Timothy, "You are how you read : Baroque Chao-errancy in Greenaway and Deleuze, in : Digital Baroque: New Media Art and Cinematic Folds" (2008), U of Minnesota P
  37. PASCOE, David, "Peter Greenaway: Museums and Moving Images" (1997), Reaktion Books
  38. PILARD, Philippe, "Entretien avec Peter Greenaway, in : Peter Greenaway" (1987), Dis Voir
  39. RODGERS, Marlene, "Prospero's Books-Word and Spectacle: An Interview with Peter Greenaway", Film Quarterly, 45(2) (1991)
  40. SPIELMANN,Yvonne, "Intermedia in Electronic Images", Leonardo, 34(1) (2001)
  41. TRIMM, Ryan, "Moving Pictures, Still Lives: Staging National Tableaux and Text in Prospero's Books", Cinema Journal, 46(3) (2007)
  42. TWEEDIE, James, "Caliban's Books: The Hybrid Text in Peter Greenaway's Prospero's Books", Cinema Journal, 40(1) (2000)
  43. SHAKESPEARE, William, "The Tempest" (1987), Oxford UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)