“V来V去”格式语义特征小考
Semantic Features of Structure on “V+lai+V+qu”
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper tries to make some new explorations on the semantic features of ‘V+lai+V+qu’. Previous studies classified the meaning according to whether it was moved or repetition, but this article classified it into three cognitive domains according to the context where the ‘V+lai+V+qu’ structure is used. We found that the structure of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ has different semantic features in the content domain, epistemic domain, and speech-act domain. The difference in these features arises from the conceptual elements that are activated in the conceptual frame of "reciprocating behavior schema". On the other hand, from a pragmatics point of view, the ‘V+lai+V+qu’ structure has some additional meaning besides its core meaning. Since the structure of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ shows a larger amount of action than expected, it shows a lot of negative meaning in the content domain. In the logical domain, it has a negative or positive meaning depending on whether it meets the expected outcome. And in the speech-act domain we can also possible to confirm the strong subjectivity because it is a conclusion from comprehensive judgment. Through the three domains and the different perspective we can clarify the meaning of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ more clearly and deeply.
Abstract
This paper tries to make some new explorations on the semantic features of ‘V+lai+V+qu’. Previous studies classified the meaning according to whether it was moved or repetition, but this article classified it into three cognitive domains according to the context where the ‘V+lai+V+qu’ structure is used. We found that the structure of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ has different semantic features in the content domain, epistemic domain, and speech-act domain. The difference in these features arises from the conceptual elements that are activated in the conceptual frame of "reciprocating behavior schema". On the other hand, from a pragmatics point of view, the ‘V+lai+V+qu’ structure has some additional meaning besides its core meaning. Since the structure of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ shows a larger amount of action than expected, it shows a lot of negative meaning in the content domain. In the logical domain, it has a negative or positive meaning depending on whether it meets the expected outcome. And in the speech-act domain we can also possible to confirm the strong subjectivity because it is a conclusion from comprehensive judgment. Through the three domains and the different perspective we can clarify the meaning of ‘V+lai+V+qu’ more clearly and deeply.
참고문헌 (18)
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2009), 한국문화사
- 陈前端, "汉语体貌研究的类型学视野" (2008), 商务印书馆
- 李福印, "認知語言學概論" (2008), 北京大學出版社
- 张斌, "新编现代汉语" (2002), 复旦大学出版社
- 弗里德里希, "认知语言学导论" (2009), 复旦大学出版社
- Sweetser Eve, (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Ronald W. Langacker, "인지문법의 토대 I" (1999), 박이정
- 刘志生, "近代汉语中的“V来V去”格式考察", 古汉语研究, (4) (2004)
- 李晋霞, "“V来V去”格式及其语法化", 语言研究, (2) (2002)
- 杉村博文, "东方语言学" (2006), 上海教育出版社
- 邵敬敏, "汉语框式结构说略", 中国语文, (3) (2011)
- 张宝胜, "也说“了2”的行、知、言三域", 中国语文, (5) (2011)
- 张虹, "谈“V来V去”", 山东师范大学学报, (1) (2007)
- 周宁, "类固定短语“X来X去”格式考察", 석사, pp.2008
- 曾传禄, "也谈“V来V去”格式及其语法化", 语言教学与研究, (6) (2008)
- 肖治野, "现代汉语语气词语的行、知、言三域研究", 박사, pp.2009
- 肖治野, "“了2”的行、知、言三域", 中国语文, (6) (2009)
- 沈家煊, "复句三域“行、知、言”", 中国语文, (3) (2003)
